HTONY, in the case this article refers to, they are not asking these midwives to care for women who have just had an abortion. They are asking them to arrange the staffing, deploy staff and so on. That is their role as a midwifery sister.
The reason that they are responsible for deploying those staff and being responsible for those staff is because the same group of staff will be responsible for late abortions, live births and still births and the care of women afterwards because the medical situation of those women after birth will be broadly medically similar.
It has not gone off topic at all. It is clearly central to the case that the same group of staff will be involved in all three types of care. Anybody wanting to carry out a role as a midwifery sister has to accept that they have to supervise and organise all of those staff. This is not the same as expecting the midwifery sister to be the member of staff for personally cares for the women or administers drugs prior to an abortion.
But she does have to supervise and organise staffing schedules for all the midwives on her team, and the midwifery team deals with abortions. You were claiming that not to be the case, which is why I had to point out that it cannot all be handed over to gynae nurses; it is the responsibility of the midwifery team as a group.
It is inevitably the role of a midwife who oversees a team of other midwives to create rotas and send some of her staff to provide care for women who have had abortions. If she feels unable to write those rotas and send staff to do that, she cannot do her job. She should either do a different midwifery job without supervisory responsibilities or she should get a different kind of supervisory job in the hospital. But putting late abortions under the care of gynae nurses who are not trained to do so, purely to create a false separation in the supposed role of the midwife team makes no sense.