Lassylass
What on earth is there in Windsor's post that is "idealism" or unlikely to be implemented any time soon? I am truly bemused by your patronising answer to a very well thought out comment.
focus on the truth that the vast majority of rapes are carried out by a known assailant - why not? It is truth.
Give women the confidence to label their experiences as rape - again, what is the problem with that?
Teach teenagers about consent and what constitutes rape - are you assuming that all teenagers know this? How many young girls are pressured into having sex, who would not call it "rape" even though it is one.
Link this to a campaign that will counter the expectation that all boys will use porn - ok, slightly more contentious but not so far of the mark to be laughable
Conduct a nationwide campaign about what constitutes rape and reinforce that message by encouraging more crime reporting and securing more convictions - why not? Why should we not encourage women to report rape? Why not strengthen the rights of women, and so protect them?
In all this, focus on the assailant and defeating the culture that he is somehow entitled to have sex, because he is a man - more idealogical, but something that can be talked about in schools surely.
And for all of us to stop perpetuating rape myths and the erroneous view that women can prevent it happening, by altering our behaviour.
Ok, there are a few points there that are arguable, but in the main they are very good points. Particularly the teaching of teenagers about rape and abuse.
I actually think that they should teach teenagers about abuse and domestic violence. And touch on controlling people (not just men), and how to recognise them, and avoid them. The "red flag" that we talked of earlier.