Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To fancy Hugh Grant right now?

196 replies

NormanTebbit · 07/07/2011 22:59

on Question Time. He is brilliant.

OP posts:
frillyflower · 08/07/2011 16:13

I wish the Daily Mail would disappear up its own horrible racist Little Englander wotsit

ThisIsANiceCage · 08/07/2011 16:16

it certainly is a big difference but the difference lies in the end and not the means

swc the difference also lies in the legal status. IANAL, but I understand there is a very specific legal defence of "in the public interest" for doing things which would in normal circumstances be illegal.

I imagine this is on a par with truth being a defence for saying things that could be libellious, and "he was burgling my house" being a defence for hitting someone on the head with a poker.

smallwhitecat · 08/07/2011 16:19

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

ThisIsANiceCage · 08/07/2011 16:34

The Telegraph on public interest defences.

Apparently there is no public interest defence to phone hacking, but there is a public interest defence to breaching the Data Protection Act.

(Not sure why you're talking about public interest defences to criminal charges in general, swc. No one has suggested such.)

ThisIsANiceCage · 08/07/2011 16:41

To be clear:

The means is not the sole arbiter of whether something is illegal. For some actions, the end is just as important in determining legality.

kerstina · 08/07/2011 16:50

Hugh is lovely but does not seem to have much of a clue about politics generally so cannot be that interested only in things that concern him. Also is he left or right leaning it was not clear to me? Would have thought he was a tory but he seemed to despise the major parties equally !
We are very shallow that we think he would make a great pm if we don't even know what his politics are Grin Some of you have watched too much love actually !

mumonahottinroof · 08/07/2011 17:23

You think he would make a great prime minister because you've read too many tabloids/trashy magazines/Mail Online and have been brainwashed by celebrity culture

vhappymumma2b · 08/07/2011 17:26

He presented himself really well, I thought - I must admit though, to having a chuckle at his first answer where he did a typical Hugh Grant mumble and pause before answering. Many of his comments had a good basis of thought.

NormanTebbit · 08/07/2011 17:41

I actually thought it was refreshing to see someone challenge a politician with facts to hand and have the guts to call out Douglas Alexander on his links to Murdoch. But I would rather poke my eyes out than watch Love Actually.

So much of the time QT is just one monotonous soundbite after another - not this time, two politicians actually had a proper argument. It was refreshing.

The only downer was the audience who seem to be made up of a bunch of 14 year old media studies students.

OP posts:
CrapolaDeVille · 08/07/2011 17:43

I just don't buy the market forces therefore the public are to blame. Most of us look at car crash pile ups when we pass doesn't mean we're anything to do with the cause, it's just curiosity.

Linerunner... spot on.

SWC.... Are you going to miss the NOTW, you seem a bit angry.

LeQueen · 08/07/2011 18:35

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LeQueen · 08/07/2011 18:43

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LineRunner · 08/07/2011 18:52

Erm ... I don't think anyone was really suggesting that Huge Grant should or could actually become our PM ... I think it is kind of a joke type thing called 'humour'. Not fall-about, for sure, but, hey.

Thank you Crapola I am glad someone reads my turgid offerings. I pin a medal on you.

CrapolaDeVille · 08/07/2011 19:05

Is Hugh Grant Huge? I hope soGrin

Just in case anyone missed your post:

Great post:
LineRunner Fri 08-Jul-11 15:49:48
News International has very deliberately been creating new consumer markets.

It has cleverly cultivated a sense of entitlement in some consumers - a feeling that they, the free-market consumer, are in some way entitled to purchase private facts about public figures - which then crossed the line to become private facts about non-public figures.

GrinGrinGrinGrinGrin

CrapolaDeVille · 08/07/2011 19:06

Norman... I am watching it tonight on iPlayer.

LineRunner · 08/07/2011 19:11

I once applied for a huge grant. Sadly I only received money.

NormanTebbit · 08/07/2011 19:29

Oh enjoy Crapola, especially Hugh preparing for his close-up, whipping off his glasses in a J'accuse manner and gently flirting with Shirley Williams.

OP posts:
CrapolaDeVille · 08/07/2011 19:55
Grin
mumonahottinroof · 08/07/2011 20:04

On market forces -

It would have been a much more satisfying ending to the NOTW if the public had simply stopped buying it/advertisers had boycotted it, so it became untenable. Instead Murdoch sacrificed it to save his share prices. We'll never know how the market would have truly judged its fall from grace

CrapolaDeVille · 08/07/2011 20:09

Too right.....this is obviously his least costly route.... I hope to God he doesn't get the BSkyB deal.

kerstina · 03/11/2011 21:19

I heard that Hugh Grant was at the labour party conference when his baby was being born. I got excited when I heard this I would love to see him more involved in politics and would be great if he actually supported the Labour party. I ressurected this thread as I have visions of him being a real life prime minister. Think love actually Grin

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread