pebbles, You know as much about me as you do about the Dangerous Dogs Act or about dogs, so cut out the insults please.
I am not "scum". I'm one of many, many thousands of people who are aware of the huge and unnecessary scope of the DDA, of it's sweeping powers as one of those very rare UK laws whereby the onus is upon the accused to prove themself innocent and not vice-versa, of that it was brought forward as a knee-jerk reaction, is ill-thought out and doesn't address the issues as it should.
And I don't have to explain myself to YOU or to any other bugger.
Besides... get it right. I said that I would remove a dog from the risk of seizure, not a dog which is under a court order. If my dog were subject to a court order he would already have been seized from me. He would have been seized rhe moment the Police turned up to arrest/question me about the incident.
He would be taken into council funded kennels, I would not be allowed to know where he was and I wouldn't be allowed to see him until when and IF he and I were found not guilty. That could take a year or more.
He would... and I have evidence of this - quite possibly be kept in conditions that would render an independent rescue in breach of the Animal Welfare Act and cause the RSPCA to cry for their dogs to be removed and their premises shut. He would be deprived of virtually all human contact and deprived of all canine contact.
And then, because the DDA says that the onus is upon M.me to prove myself innocent, unlike the law covering human murder, burglary etc etc, in which the law states that it is for the prosecution to prove the defendant guilty,because it's one person fighting a hugely well funded prosecution, because there is so much ignorance of dog welfare and so much prejuduce against them in the current climate, my dog may very well be ordered to be killed rather than rehabilitated.
I deal with all manner of dogs and I see what can be done in terms of rehabilitation when people put in the effort, time and energy. When
I would rather take my chances with the law and have my dog safely in an environment where he can be properly cared for and rehabilitated. I am not "some wallah" nor "scum" and I wasn't advising the OP to do as I was. I said that this would be something that I would by that time considering if I were in her position. I made it crystal clear that this was - QUOTE - "my personal view and I must making [sic] the OP aware of the fact that it would not be a legitimate action.".
So please cut the insults and stop accusing me of things I haven't said or advised.