Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to object to terms such as manageress or authoress?

164 replies

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:21

It was mentioned on another thread but was really a side issue, so I've started another one.

OP posts:
worraliberty · 13/04/2011 17:22

On what grounds do you object?

ashamedandconfused · 13/04/2011 17:23

Hmm, i have noticed we only have actORS now, not actors and actresses

does not bother me TBH

JenaiMarrHePlaysGuitar · 13/04/2011 17:23

YANBU.

Manageress is archaic. If Mrs Slocombe had been promoted she would have been a manageress though.

atswimtwolengths · 13/04/2011 17:24

I agree with you, OP!

And what about 'poetess'?

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:24

Sorry posted accidentally before I'd finished typing. Surely it's sexist to point out that the job holder is a woman by adding the suffix, rather than the "norm" which is a manager or author.

OP posts:
marmaladetwatkins · 13/04/2011 17:25

I don't find it offensive, just a bit old-fashioned and twee.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:26

atswim - poetess suggests someone dressed up like Little Bo Peep sitting in a field of poppies imo. Grin

OP posts:
RevoltingPeasant · 13/04/2011 17:26

It is quite patronising.... but who actually says this? Have you been called 'manageress' by someone or something?

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:27

And what do we think about "Madam Chairman"?

OP posts:
altinkum · 13/04/2011 17:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LyingWitchInTheWardrobe2726 · 13/04/2011 17:28

I was hoping your were joking... but you're not. It appears that there are no limits to the offense that is seemingly caused by proper words. [hmm)

You're completely unreasonable, it's just a word and it will get the point where nobody can talk about anything without a series of disclaimers and a retained lawyer standing by... so tiresome.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:28

Revolting - it was in the OP of the baby crying in the restaurant thread and there was a mini debate about it among all the general flaming.

OP posts:
Butterbur · 13/04/2011 17:28

No YABU. They bring gender into issues where it is irrelevant at and manage to be derogatory at the same time.

worraliberty · 13/04/2011 17:29

No not really.

I'm proud to be female and I don't care who knows it Wink

HecateQueenOfTheNight · 13/04/2011 17:29

Is er=male and ess = female in itself sexist? any more than him and her, she and he? I don't think it is.

If you come at it from the pov that people think a manager is a man unless otherwise specified, then that is sexist. If you see it as above, then that is just - grammar? and not sexist.

Will be reading with interest for other pov though. Always happy to be educated on this issue.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:30

LyingWitch - It's not something I would get severely het up about and certainly wouldn't bring in the lawyers, but I have to say that I do find it somewhat patronising.

OP posts:
Vallhala · 13/04/2011 17:31

In some situations I actually prefer it, but then again I'm old. I won't put up with sexism but I see nothing sexist in referring to, for example, a woman who acts as an actress. IMHO "actress", "manageress" etc only become offensive when the knowledge that the person is a woman is used to discriminate against her.

Something I find far more unacceptable are terms such as "Chairman" when the post-holder is a woman and should thus be "Chairwoman". After all, "Chairperson" sounds ridiculous and "Chair" is an item of furniture, not a position within an organisation.

My late headmistress would be turning in her grave at the very thought of being called "headteacher"!

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:32

"Is er=male and ess = female in itself sexist?"

I'm not sure er=male. In the case of manager, I means one who manages surely. Manageress, is one who manages who happens to be female imo.

OP posts:
altinkum · 13/04/2011 17:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:32

sorry should read "it means one who manages surely"

OP posts:
worraliberty · 13/04/2011 17:33

How is identifying your gender 'patronising'?

Surely it's only patronising if you feel less of a person for being female?

I certainly don't feel less of a person because I'm not a man...so therefore I'm quite happy for my gender to be known in my absence.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:33

altinkum - lots of nouns are patronising.

OP posts:
altinkum · 13/04/2011 17:36

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

RogerMelly · 13/04/2011 17:37

I suppose it would be annoying if you were the area manager

LyingWitchInTheWardrobe2726 · 13/04/2011 17:37

MaundyBra... You might not get het up about it but that doesn't mean that gender-specific terms don't light the blue touchpaper as it is.

I really can't understand the fuss some people make about it... if someone uses a term that isn't appreciated, a quiet word asking them to stop usually does the trick. I have a preference not to be called 'Poppet' when I'm in a meeting but I'm not going to leap across the table, snarling and pinning the perpetrator up against the wall should he forget himself.

I guess this is just one of those things that makes me think that the long-fought credibility of women starts to slide into the abyss of trivia.