Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to object to terms such as manageress or authoress?

164 replies

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:21

It was mentioned on another thread but was really a side issue, so I've started another one.

OP posts:
worraliberty · 13/04/2011 17:22

On what grounds do you object?

ashamedandconfused · 13/04/2011 17:23

Hmm, i have noticed we only have actORS now, not actors and actresses

does not bother me TBH

JenaiMarrHePlaysGuitar · 13/04/2011 17:23

YANBU.

Manageress is archaic. If Mrs Slocombe had been promoted she would have been a manageress though.

atswimtwolengths · 13/04/2011 17:24

I agree with you, OP!

And what about 'poetess'?

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:24

Sorry posted accidentally before I'd finished typing. Surely it's sexist to point out that the job holder is a woman by adding the suffix, rather than the "norm" which is a manager or author.

OP posts:
marmaladetwatkins · 13/04/2011 17:25

I don't find it offensive, just a bit old-fashioned and twee.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:26

atswim - poetess suggests someone dressed up like Little Bo Peep sitting in a field of poppies imo. Grin

OP posts:
RevoltingPeasant · 13/04/2011 17:26

It is quite patronising.... but who actually says this? Have you been called 'manageress' by someone or something?

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:27

And what do we think about "Madam Chairman"?

OP posts:
altinkum · 13/04/2011 17:27

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LyingWitchInTheWardrobe2726 · 13/04/2011 17:28

I was hoping your were joking... but you're not. It appears that there are no limits to the offense that is seemingly caused by proper words. [hmm)

You're completely unreasonable, it's just a word and it will get the point where nobody can talk about anything without a series of disclaimers and a retained lawyer standing by... so tiresome.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:28

Revolting - it was in the OP of the baby crying in the restaurant thread and there was a mini debate about it among all the general flaming.

OP posts:
Butterbur · 13/04/2011 17:28

No YABU. They bring gender into issues where it is irrelevant at and manage to be derogatory at the same time.

worraliberty · 13/04/2011 17:29

No not really.

I'm proud to be female and I don't care who knows it Wink

HecateQueenOfTheNight · 13/04/2011 17:29

Is er=male and ess = female in itself sexist? any more than him and her, she and he? I don't think it is.

If you come at it from the pov that people think a manager is a man unless otherwise specified, then that is sexist. If you see it as above, then that is just - grammar? and not sexist.

Will be reading with interest for other pov though. Always happy to be educated on this issue.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:30

LyingWitch - It's not something I would get severely het up about and certainly wouldn't bring in the lawyers, but I have to say that I do find it somewhat patronising.

OP posts:
Vallhala · 13/04/2011 17:31

In some situations I actually prefer it, but then again I'm old. I won't put up with sexism but I see nothing sexist in referring to, for example, a woman who acts as an actress. IMHO "actress", "manageress" etc only become offensive when the knowledge that the person is a woman is used to discriminate against her.

Something I find far more unacceptable are terms such as "Chairman" when the post-holder is a woman and should thus be "Chairwoman". After all, "Chairperson" sounds ridiculous and "Chair" is an item of furniture, not a position within an organisation.

My late headmistress would be turning in her grave at the very thought of being called "headteacher"!

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:32

"Is er=male and ess = female in itself sexist?"

I'm not sure er=male. In the case of manager, I means one who manages surely. Manageress, is one who manages who happens to be female imo.

OP posts:
altinkum · 13/04/2011 17:32

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:32

sorry should read "it means one who manages surely"

OP posts:
worraliberty · 13/04/2011 17:33

How is identifying your gender 'patronising'?

Surely it's only patronising if you feel less of a person for being female?

I certainly don't feel less of a person because I'm not a man...so therefore I'm quite happy for my gender to be known in my absence.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:33

altinkum - lots of nouns are patronising.

OP posts:
altinkum · 13/04/2011 17:36

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

RogerMelly · 13/04/2011 17:37

I suppose it would be annoying if you were the area manager

LyingWitchInTheWardrobe2726 · 13/04/2011 17:37

MaundyBra... You might not get het up about it but that doesn't mean that gender-specific terms don't light the blue touchpaper as it is.

I really can't understand the fuss some people make about it... if someone uses a term that isn't appreciated, a quiet word asking them to stop usually does the trick. I have a preference not to be called 'Poppet' when I'm in a meeting but I'm not going to leap across the table, snarling and pinning the perpetrator up against the wall should he forget himself.

I guess this is just one of those things that makes me think that the long-fought credibility of women starts to slide into the abyss of trivia.