Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to object to terms such as manageress or authoress?

164 replies

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:21

It was mentioned on another thread but was really a side issue, so I've started another one.

OP posts:
altinkum · 13/04/2011 17:38

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

HecateQueenOfTheNight · 13/04/2011 17:38

or -manager is one who manages who happens to be male and manageress is one who manages who happens to be female?

Are there any other languages who operate a masculine and feminine? I know french does, but not in that way? or does it?

I get that it's the 'tagging on' of a bit after the main word.

it's all 'of man', isn't it? wo-man. of-man. the male and then the female add-on.

Susiewho · 13/04/2011 17:39

YANBU. No need to state that the person in the role is a woman.

I detest "ess"!

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:39

Altinkum - I already explained above why I think it it patronising. It's sexist to point out that the job holder is a woman by adding the suffix, rather than the perceived "norm" which is a manager or author.

I'm sorry I don't follow your user-name argument.

OP posts:
LyingWitchInTheWardrobe2726 · 13/04/2011 17:40

I think most European languages do, Hecate. French, as you've said - German, Spanish, Italian... all have the masculine and feminine.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:41

Maybe I should have put this in the Feminist topic Grin

OP posts:
RevoltingPeasant · 13/04/2011 17:41

altinkum.... nouns can be patronising, surely? What about calling a woman 'broad' or 'sweetheart' - those are nouns and I'd flip if some stranger called me those!!

worraliberty, I think it's patronising cos it identifies gender over and above the role, if you see what I mean. (Not sure how clear I'm being Hmm).

Like, actor or manager simply refer to a function: one who acts, one who managers.

Whereas, actress = actor + feminine ending ess = actress
manager + fem ending ess = manageress

It's taking the basic role and then adding a gratuitous 'oh look it's a woman' to it.

Just think about how weird it'd be to say teacheress, officeress, it'd be obviously making a point. So I don't see how manageress is different in that respect!

Whew, essay :)

squeakytoy · 13/04/2011 17:42

prince and princess?

what would you suggest with those titles then?

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:43

Ah you've got me there squeaky! But they're not referring to a job function though.

OP posts:
RevoltingPeasant · 13/04/2011 17:43

Well squeaky if we abolised the Royal Family then we wouldn't have those problems, eh....

Cloudydays · 13/04/2011 17:44

YANBU!! Glad you started the new thread as I was itching to reply again on the other one but didn't want to hijack.

But now that I have a chance to reply, you and RevoltingPeasant already made all the points I wanted to re: why it's a patronising term. :)

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:44

I think the peasants are revolting....

OP posts:
LyingWitchInTheWardrobe2726 · 13/04/2011 17:44

Maundy... Perhaps! Wink

Now, what about further education? The dreaded 'Masters' degree? What is to become of it? Shock

worraliberty · 13/04/2011 17:45

Pointing out someone's gender is not sexist OP Hmm

SkinittingFluffyBunnyBonnets · 13/04/2011 17:45

Imagine "Plumberess" or "Mechanicess"

worraliberty · 13/04/2011 17:46

Hmmm 'Mistress' degree does tend to conjour up a different image altogether 'Lying* Blush

LyingWitchInTheWardrobe2726 · 13/04/2011 17:47

Worraliberty... It does, doesn't it. Grin

bemybebe · 13/04/2011 17:48

squeakytoy "prince and princess... what would you suggest with those titles then?"

Prince and princess get and carry those titles by the virtue of their birth and sex. Female professionals get their positions due to their achievements. Maybe that is the difference. Also why there will never be a 'Presidenteress' but a 'President'.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:48

"Pointing out someone's gender is not sexist OP"

I agree. But taking a perfectly good job title and having to change it to single out the fact that a woman is doing the job is imo.

OP posts:
stubbornhubby · 13/04/2011 17:48

it's interesting that high status, professional jobs don't ever have the ess added

  • doctor
  • lawyer
  • accountant
  • teacher
  • dentist
  • barrister

and so on.

this is quite revealing : becasue those are high-status it doesn't sit comfortably to use the demeaning 'ess.

On the other hand, waht jobs is is the ess common?

  • waitress
  • actress
  • seamstress
Tuggy · 13/04/2011 17:49

I agree OP!

It is the assumption that a manager MUST be male. Therefore we'd better think of some other word to show that its female...

bemybebe · 13/04/2011 17:49

OP Yanbu in my opinion, but I would not get too uptight about the people who still cannot decide whether to move into the XX century. Wink

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:49

Lawyeress?
Doctoress?

OP posts:
Cloudydays · 13/04/2011 17:49

Pointing out someone's gender for the purpose of differentiating them from the 'norm' and putting the emphasis on their gender rather than their role is sexist, worraliberty . OP has already made that point.

MaundyBra · 13/04/2011 17:49

x post - was just about to go down the same line of thinking as stubbornhubby

OP posts: