Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to REALLY hope this man's partner joins Mumnset

413 replies

MmeLindt · 03/02/2011 12:40

Why I hate Mumsnet

First, I would like to congratulate the blogger on the forthcoming happy event. I wish him and his partner all the best for the birth of their first child.

If his partner decides to join MN, she will learn:

The Vernacular
that we use abbreviations as a time-saving tool, so that we have more time for discussing banalities. These are not only common to Mumsnet (MN) but to almost all fora.

"My DH is working away tuesday til friday. DH rang PIL and asked them if they could come and mind DCs (x3)". Another example: "AIBU to be annoyed that PIL agreed to mind my DC and then went back on it??"

  • the first poster states that her husband (DarlingHusband = DH) is working away and that he asked Parents-In-Laws (PILS) if they could come and mind the three children (DarlingChildren = DC). She then asks if she is being unreasonable (AIBU = Am I being unreasonable) to be annoyed that my parents in laws agreed to mind my children then went back on it?

hth (Hope this Helps)

The Banality
If she looks a little further, she will certainly find posts about dishwashers, and pearl barley, but also intellectual discussions about feminism, foreign affairs, literature (and we are NOT talking chick lit here). Even the most highbrow of poster wants to slum it on AIBU sometimes though.

I would hope that blogger's partner never has problems with their children - since his response to a woman enquiring about her child's (DC) incontinence problems is to suggest that she spends less time on MN.

The Stupid Suggestions For Campaigns
she might wonder about the anti-JL MN campaign since most posters have never heard of it. Just because one poster has an idea, it does not mean that the whole board takes up the cry. There are always discussions about the merits of any campaigns, particularly the official ones.

Lack of Reply
If the blogger's DP (that is DarlingPartner, by the way) does post on MN she will hopefully be relieved that MN does not allow their posters to be spammed by companies. There have been a few instances where posters have complained about a product, and the company has posted a message apologising and requesting that the poster contact them. I have never seen these offers being deleted or discouraged by MNHQ (that is Mumsnet Headquarters)

The blogger's DP of course would never have to do this, as she has her DH available to ensure that she does not misunderstand the instructions of the product.

Lack of Moderation
The blogger's DP will hopefully enjoy the lack of moderation - or rather the advantages offered by self-moderation. There may be times when a poster gives out of date advice, but this is normally noticed by the other posters. And if not, anyone who relies on the advice of strangers on an internet forum in order to make decisions such as those posed by the nuchal fold test, they should not be in charge of a puppy, much less a child. Most posters will link to websites such as NHS24, or other sites that are checked for accuracy rather than spouting inaccurate advice.

I am very glad that he is not calling for the site to be closed down. His DP may well be in need of it in the not so distant future, when she starts a thread entitled,

"AIBU to think my DP is an idiot?"

OP posts:
comixminx · 07/02/2011 07:26

This not thus, bloody autocorrect. Had already caught "dies" instead of "does"...

Hullygully · 07/02/2011 07:55

I would imagine lots of us have tweeted about darling Gray Gray...haven't we?

RunAwayWife · 07/02/2011 08:09

I bet the only reason he does not want his Partner on MN is we might open her eyes to what a pillock he sounds Grin

plupervert · 07/02/2011 08:58

Graeme, there's still time to come back and admit that you misinderstood the MN phenomenon, that you took only a cursory look and formed your opinions based on that.

We've all had moments of humiliation, but grownups can "take it on the chin" and learn.

Seriously, I would be quite impressed if you came back to show your face now, after all that's said above. Otherwise, this sword of Damocles could be hanging over the head of your brand for some time.

Hullygully · 07/02/2011 13:14

A long, long time.

cakeywakey · 07/02/2011 13:21

Always amazed when PR people do their own PR really badly. Not exactly a ringing endorsment of their skills.

dickiedavisthunderthighs · 07/02/2011 13:25

I work in advertising. I have emailed Graeme's blog to all of my clients as a stirling example of how NOT to use social media.
What a nob.

BoffinMum · 07/02/2011 13:26

It's funny he thinks that customers are there to be controlled and if he can't control their opinions, then something has gone wrong.

Arse about face, that.

mammamiamamma · 07/02/2011 15:41

Dickiedavisthunderthighs ....I salute you and followed suit!

BecauseImWorthIt · 07/02/2011 18:13

I notice that he has put a link to this thread on his Twitter page. I wonder if he is bothering to read the comments and replies here?

pascoe28 · 07/02/2011 18:17

I think he made some valid points. Yeah, flame me - bothered.

JamieLeeCurtis · 07/02/2011 18:19

Graeme? Is that you?

BecauseImWorthIt · 07/02/2011 18:29

His Twitter bio says:

Communications agency specialising in influencing what consumers think and say about brands

So I guess he's just more than a little pissed off that he can't control us so easily

@BrandReputation, if anyone wants to have a look

Jacksmama · 07/02/2011 20:55

What a stupid spelling of a name, btw. [frivolous post emoticon]

BecauseImWorthIt · 07/02/2011 22:02

pascoe28 - I'm amazed that you bother to stay on Mn as you obviously hate us all/hate it here so much!

Valpollicella · 07/02/2011 23:10

Gray Gray! You came back!

What did you think about the poetry?

Pascoe, that fiiiine you think he has valid points! Good for you.

300 odd posts above would disagree, but hey, it's MN. We like a debate. Grin

BoffinMum · 08/02/2011 07:59

Here's something for you, Gray Gray.

Many of us hate brands on here because they try to manipulate us psychologically into paying extra money for basics in the pretence that their eggs, shampoo, tampons, toilet roll or whatever give us some sort of social edge and make us better people.

Brand management is vapid and pointless unless its consumer led. You need a bit more pull and a bit less push, dearie. Your blog has made many of us distrust brands even more. Own goal, that.

plupervert · 08/02/2011 10:32

BecauseImWorthIt, where did you get that pascoe 28 "hates us all so much"?

pascoe28, you might have elaborated a bit...

BecauseImWorthIt · 08/02/2011 12:10

plupervert - from all the many and varied posts that he/she has made recently! Did you think I'd made it up? Confused

Hullygully · 08/02/2011 12:14

Indeed Biwi.

But let us not be distracted from our main purpose of helping Gray Gray.

plupervert · 08/02/2011 13:28

On this thread, though? Sorry, I didn't think it was the done thing to follow someone about the talk boards, so I questioned it.

JamieLeeCurtis · 08/02/2011 13:57

pluperfect - not on this thread, no, but some of us are on here far too much a lot, and across Topics, and so do recognise other people

JamieLeeCurtis · 08/02/2011 13:57

but I don't follow anyone.

plupervert · 08/02/2011 13:59

I see.

BecauseImWorthIt · 08/02/2011 14:30

Sorry Hully.