Really enjoying this thread.
Its a tough one really. My initial thought was of course you arent being unreasonable, once they were well cared for and provided for by their parents its no ones business and certaintly doesnt bother me how large another person's family is.
That said, I have being slightly swayed in my thinking by some of the responses on here - food for thought, I suppose. Definately not the environmental ones but thought secondcomings post:
( Add message | Report | Message poster TheSecondComing Mon 27-Dec-10 12:55:46
i agree quint,can't see how or why someone would have 10 kids-it's just not fair on any of the, once a say, 5 year old is in chool there's maybe 3 or 4 hours after school to have tea\bath\homework\playing\reading book etc. before bedtime. multiply that, intersperse feeding 9 other kids, cooking,dishwashing etc and there is\can be no time with parents who must be just 'processing' their kids or palming off responsibility to the older kids for the younger ones)
... did make alot of sense. Just appears logical. I dont know though, I dont know you or your dh or how you run your house. I cant imagine this working for us, but its possibly because Im quite disorganised, spontanious etc.. you could very well make this work fantastically. I couldnt.
All in all though, I would find it very difficult to look at any child and think "your parents were unreasonable for having you" so, no, your children are here and you are definately not unreasonable for having them (huge congratulations btw on BFP).
Reading this I have wondered though, what is the cut off point before a family is considered too big etc..