"You have picked up an instance of woolly thinking (according to you) and followed it to the conclusion that I am 'thick'.
That's bullying"
No I haven't. I've asked you repeatedly to justify your arguments and you've refused. On one occassion I said that simply ignoring my points and refusing to back up your opinions makes you look "not too bright".
If it has become bullying to ask someone to address there opinions when they are engaging ina debate then how in the world are debates meant to go?
On the other hand you've made insinuations that I have an agenda, am a bully and have intimated that I may be a sympathiser of the BNP. All these were done simply to avoid addressing my points with regards to your arguments.
Once again, with no agenda other than trying to further this debate, I'll ask you to address my points.
Why would you make the statement, "I don't care if it was the real BNP or not" when it is a thread seeking to condemn the BNP for something they have supposedly done? Surely whether they did it or not is relevant when seeking to apportion blame to the party rather than a group of their supporters.
And why would you make the statement, "there silence is support in my book." when a: at first you cared not whether it was them or not
and B: when it was shown that they were in fact not silent on the issue, why did you so quickly abandon your previous stance that silence equated to support. Why was their silence initially so damning to you, but now it is irrelevant so that you need not apportion any signifigance to their actions.
Also how do you justify your logic that I must prove to you that they had absolutely no idea about this, when that is an impossibility. I've asked you repeatedly if you'd accept this line of argument from someone else and you've ignored the question. As I said earlier, would it be a valid argument for me to say "prove to me that you knew nothing about this site a week ago and didn't silently sit back and do nothing. If you can't prove that to me absolutely I will take that as your support of this sire.". I doubt you would because it's a ridiculous argument as it's impossible to prove.
"MQ....Perhaps BTP just thinks you are wasting valuable thread debate focussing upon the wrong thing,"
She may well think that but she has so far failed to explain why this would be a waste of a valuable thread. The thread is focussed on whether or not the BNP should be held responsible for this particular issue, so that is what I have focussed on. This has at no point been a thread on the political ideals or political goals of the BNP as a political party.
I'm debating the issue at hand an asking someone who has taken the opposite stance from me to justify why they have taken such a stance. When I have asked them to justify or explain their positions I have been ignored. When I have repeated the questions I have all of a sudden been accused of being a bully, harassing them,having an agenda, my arguments being personal and even insinuations that I'm somehow sticking up for the BNP as a party.