Ok, I cannot sort out what is worse:
Woman shags 42 men from a stag party (let us hope the groom to be was not among their number), she does this by letting the blokes queue up in the same room and take their turn.
The blokes being prepared to watch 1-41 of their mates shagging before taking their turn is vile, if my DH had been any of that number he would be history (actually DH, being who he is would have thrown a bucket of water over them).
Woman thinks this is a laugh, blokes happily stand in a queue, drinking and chatting and preparing their erections (yeurg)
She goes on TV to talk about it,making it utterly clear who she is, who the men must have been, and thus making sure anyone related to her or married to or with any of the blokes is humiliated while she gets to be on TV.
Oh, and wanting to talk to Philip Schofield about anything is pretty disturbing as well.
I can also say I never thought I'd ever feel sympathy for Philip Schofield, but I do now. On those grounds alone I dislike that woman intensely.
Whether a not the term "slag" should be employed is pretty minor when you think of the trail of human misery and STD's that this behaviour will cause.
SO, what term should we use for a very promiscuous woman, who makes sure everyone knows who she slept with and talks about it on TV and on a blog in graphic detail?
I do remember someone once referring to a woman with a bit of a libido as a "fuck monster", I do not like this term myself but it sprang into my mind when reading about this woman's antics.