"When I was blogging I "knew" a lot of Americans and many of the women would not ever consider driving a manual transmission"
Sensible women.
We're both been driving for twenty five years and have owned all sorts of weird shit, including one with a column shift, one with synchromesh worn to the point you needed to double de-clutch the lower gears (younger readers, ask your grandad) and an original interior Citroen BX ('nuff said). We're both perfectly able to, for example, drive left-hand drive manuals.
Day-to-day, we both run automatics. Why on earth would you want to do your daily driving with an unnecessary task? Do people want cars with manual chokes, manual advance/retard? Why do you think almost every "luxury" car as an auto?
A lot of nervous drivers are nervous because of the gearbox. They're nervous that at some unspecified point they may need to change gear, and they worry they might not be able to do it. They're nervous that they might stall pulling out of a junction. They can't confidently do a hill start. They can't change gear quickly from 1st to 2nd joining faster traffic, which is an especial problem in diesels. They don't have smooth clutch control so struggle to park. And so on, and so on.
Just buy an auto. These days they're perfectly sensible on fuel (the DSG Golfs and Polos are better on fuel than their manual brethren), last a million years and are Just Nicer To Drive.
Given we run autos, the kids will learn on a mix of autos and manuals. Ideal: they can learn to drive (positioning, anticipation, choice of speed and line, awareness) with one less thing to worry about. Changing gear is a straightforward manual skill, which people are asked to acquire (and badly taught: ask people to explain what a clutch does and see how confused they are) whilst learning a whole set of other, more complex, skills. Why on earth do some people, men and women, think that being able to change gear is something that's the hallmark of good driving? Not killing people is the hallmark of good driving.