So, on a different level of 'anti-social' behaviour, perhaps you would like to explain how you would tackle a (hypothetical) business, SGB, on your doorstep, which was proven to be supplying thumbscrews, metal-spiked masks, and other instruments of torture, to various foreign security services.
Just because it 'offended some views on human rights' would you still defend the business and attack any (your words) 'whinyarses' who demonstrated for its closure, because you felt that putting a company out of business was unjustified ?
(I could have used a firm dealing with vivisection of animals, as a half-way house to torture of humans, but decided to jump straight to an indefensible trade in one go.)