By VinegarTits Tue 17-Nov-09 17:03:39
'Yeah, because the area she is from (not far from where I live, so I know it) is renowned for it's classy, caring, breastfeeding, attachment parenting and babymooning for optimal infant-mother bonding and general enlightened parenting. '
i'm from that area thanks! what a nasty bitchy thing to say
By tigerbear Tue 17-Nov-09 18:49:04
Vinegartits - I agree, that's an awful thing to say. It seems that a few people on this thread feel it's ok to put others down, simply because they don't fit into their own oh so perfect moulds of what a real mother should be (and the area those perfect mothers live in - why did you feel you had to say that lovely comment Greenmonkies??).
Ok, to answer you both;
The area you are from is relevant, we tend to do what we see around us. With some exceptions most people follow the behavioural patterns we grow up with. So, speaking in general sociological/anthropological terms Coleen is from a working class/low education/low income background. The social norm (for young mums) in these areas tends to be put baby on the bottle (no attempt to breastfeed) and "get your life back" and leave baby with granny etc and co-sleeping/attachment parenting/breastfeeding is unusual in areas like this.
This is not a bitchy or nasty thing to say, it's the truth. The truth may not always be sweet and lovely, but that doesn't mean it's not the truth all the same.
I think this sums it up;
By lulabellarama Tue 17-Nov-09 15:16:24
My instinct is that it is odd to be happy leaving a 10 day old baby for an entire evening. I can understand having a couple of hours off, but she was out for at least 5 hours.
Personally that seems totally alien.
I also agree that it further perpetuates the myth that we all just snap back to normal after giving birth.
Of course it is entirely her choice, but it doesn't sit right with me.