Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Man has jumped into Tiger enclosure

1000 replies

PrincessHoneysuckle · 10/10/2026 17:45

At Yorkshire wildlife park.Anyone seen the video? I live local to it and the video of the man wagging his finger at it telling it no like a toddler is shocking.Hes lucky he wasnt killed.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Papyrophile · 11/10/2026 21:17

Possibly twice!

peppy23 · 11/10/2026 21:18

@DaisytheElephantalso if you truly you can’t feel empathy/sympathy for ALL, including the poor guy then there’s something wrong with you as a human being.

Dunnocantthinkofone · 11/10/2026 21:18

Papyrophile · 11/10/2026 21:17

Possibly twice!

Let’s agree on somewhere in between. The number of your posts deleted certainly total more than two. And even in posts remaining your position is clear. You just chose your words marginally more carefully

ForeverTheOptomist · 11/10/2026 21:22

Dunnocantthinkofone · 11/10/2026 21:16

@Papyrophile called the man who died a moron. Approximately 50 times it seems.
Despite there being large clues as to his capacity to know what he was doing (unconfirmed but heavily suspected)

None of my comments have been directed at anyone other than her.

It's awful. Psychosis will lead someone to put themself in a lion's or tigers den. He would have felt safe and his destiny. And a love for the animals.

Papyrophile · 11/10/2026 21:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

frozendaisy · 11/10/2026 21:27

Sparrowsandbudgies · 11/10/2026 19:18

I know this is a very small point in your post but just to point out a lot of older teens and adults with autism wear headphones, even when they’re not actually listening to anything, as a form of less visible ear defenders. My teenage son with autism rarely ever removes his AirPods for this reason. As a young child he had those huge ear defenders but he grew very conscious of them as he’s got older. He even has it written in as part of his ehcp that he can wear his AirPods at school when necessary- he is at an autism specific specialist school - which is linked to an electronic device kept under teachers lock that plays a pre selected soundtrack if he wishes or he can just have them silent.

I was just speculating. It’s a possibility that what this man was listening to contributed to his actions.

Our (NT) teens wear headphones and pods, their mates carry them round, some ND sone not. A lot of people wear ear speakers. Virtually none climb into a big cat enclosure.

So in this case it MIGHT be relevant.

Papyrophile · 11/10/2026 21:27

And I don't quite understand why my posts this afternoon about my work at a mental health institution are subject to moderation.

ForeverTheOptomist · 11/10/2026 21:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I was a 1960s girl and it was always offensive. But thank you. Accepted on my behalf and hopefully everyone elses. x

AcquadiP · 11/10/2026 21:28

peppy23 · 11/10/2026 21:18

@DaisytheElephantalso if you truly you can’t feel empathy/sympathy for ALL, including the poor guy then there’s something wrong with you as a human being.

Agreed.

DaisytheElephant · 11/10/2026 21:30

FloorToCeilingWindow · 11/10/2026 21:07

You can have empathy for all who had to witness this tragic event, and the YWP staff and emergency services who dealt with the aftermath whilst also having sympathy for the man, who clearly did not have mental capacity. One doesn’t cancel the other out.

You’re right that you can, but you don’t have to. There’s a lot of assumptions being made on social media about the man’s mental health/disabilities with very few facts available.

Kalanthe · 11/10/2026 21:30

66babe · 10/10/2026 17:46

Well I hope they didn’t shoot the tiger !

The park has confirmed this:
"Many, many people have contacted us about Altai, the tiger. We can reassure everyone that he is safe and well and will not be euthanised as a result of this incident."

Normally animals are killed when they become dangerous to people while living amongst them - e.g. a dog who mauled a person cannot live amongst people and needs to be put down. Recently a deer in a London park had to be shot because idiots were feeding him picnic food and he started approaching people who were eating, which could lead to him attacking someone with his antlers. The tiger acted like any tiger would. He has always been a danger to the public, this is why they're kept in enclosures. There was no point in shooting him for acting like a tiger

ForeverTheOptomist · 11/10/2026 21:31

The whole situation is beyond comprehension. There's nothing that we can do, but send the family our sorrow that he got to the point that this was the correct thing for him to do.

Edit - typo

SummerT1me3 · 11/10/2026 21:32

OpenScroller · 11/10/2026 16:39

There's no BUT here IMO and I don't understand the mentality of people who think there is.

A young man who very clearly did not understand the danger he put himself in for WHATEVER reason, was slashed, clawed and had chunks bitten out of him by an extremely powerful, savage, beast leading to him being killed within a few minutes of getting into it's enclosure.

A brutal, gruesome, bloody, savage painful death for an obviously vulnerable and cognitively impaired young man.

It's a horrific tragedy. There are no buts.

I want to know why these animal parks do not have to legally ensure the enclosures of these dangerous animals, that they chose to house, are totally secure from inside and outside.

That should be pretty goddamn basic!

RIP to that poor young man who was dancing, maybe had an obsession with and was excited about seeing the tigers, who thought he could pet them and didn't understand what the tiger was going to do to him. I don't want to imagine the shock, fear and pain he felt.

Even as a lifelong ethical vegetarian who isn't disgustingly hypocritical, unlike meat eaters are about the worth of animals they raise to suffer so they can eat them and the other more aesthetically or emotionally pleasing animals they pamper and protect, I have no hesitation in saying the tiger should have been shot dead immediately to save that lad. I don't betray my own species either.

Edited

Why the hell should the animal be shot dead?! The animal was acting as a lion does and should do. The animal shouldn’t be punished for an animal being in their space, irrespective of the reasoning

Thecows · 11/10/2026 21:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I'm probably a similar age to you but don't use your language. Thank god there's only 3 pages left for you to keep on being offensive, you're clearly enjoying it too much than is healthy.

Dunnocantthinkofone · 11/10/2026 21:37

I presume that euthanasia during the actual attack would have been considered if there was a realistic chance of saving him and not endangering others in the process. But the staff are hardly going to be wandering around the park with guns and nor should they be, By the time it was even a remote possibility. it would have been too late
Killing the tiger afterwards for being a tiger? Would have been ridiculous

MrMucker · 11/10/2026 21:37

SummerT1me3 · 11/10/2026 21:32

Why the hell should the animal be shot dead?! The animal was acting as a lion does and should do. The animal shouldn’t be punished for an animal being in their space, irrespective of the reasoning

Erm.... tiger.

FloorToCeilingWindow · 11/10/2026 21:37

DaisytheElephant · 11/10/2026 21:30

You’re right that you can, but you don’t have to. There’s a lot of assumptions being made on social media about the man’s mental health/disabilities with very few facts available.

Then perhaps wait for the facts to become publicly available before you start spouting off about “having no sympathy”.

ForeverTheOptomist · 11/10/2026 21:38

SummerT1me3 · 11/10/2026 21:32

Why the hell should the animal be shot dead?! The animal was acting as a lion does and should do. The animal shouldn’t be punished for an animal being in their space, irrespective of the reasoning

I agree. What the hell? This man was in the animal's territory! You want to keep animals here in the uK for peoples enjoyment? They are preditors. They don't distinguish. Why the hell should they suffer for identifying that a human had entered their pen? As for him, I have said before. I believe that he was suffering with Psychosis. There is no other reasonable explanation.

FourCheese · 11/10/2026 21:39

How can you claim to have worked with adults with vulnerable adults who needed residential care etc. - but over the course of this thread, have struggled to use non-offensive language and still stand by calling the man here a ‘moron’. Plus multiple sarcastic apologies.

Amazed you haven’t been banned given that moderators seem to be patrolling this thread just for you.

Edit - post I tried tk quote was just deleted! And there you have it.

Portmore · 11/10/2026 21:40

SouthLondonMum22 · 11/10/2026 18:43

So this can only happen if someone dies? I'm just thinking that no changes had to be made with the crocodile enclosure after the incident a few months ago.

There hasn't been an inquest yet.
The process can take months or years in a complex case. The criminal proceedings against the man would also need to conclude first & that's not even gone to court yet

Pyjamatimenow · 11/10/2026 21:40

BubblingBobbling · 10/10/2026 19:13

The same as the incident earlier in the year where the lad with learning difficulties threw the young child into the crocodile enclosure, what the hell were the carers doing at the time?

I work in adult social care and it breaks my heart when I see people in care not being properly watched over, I've seen many carers taking their service users out in to the community and spending half the time on their phones.

If you pay peanuts you get monkeys. When my father in law was dying the carers we had in were crap but then they were probably being paid very little. Who would want to do these types of jobs?

ChunkyMonkey36 · 11/10/2026 21:40

FourCheese · 11/10/2026 21:39

How can you claim to have worked with adults with vulnerable adults who needed residential care etc. - but over the course of this thread, have struggled to use non-offensive language and still stand by calling the man here a ‘moron’. Plus multiple sarcastic apologies.

Amazed you haven’t been banned given that moderators seem to be patrolling this thread just for you.

Edit - post I tried tk quote was just deleted! And there you have it.

Edited

I think it must have been work experience for a course or qualification of some sort.

I don’t think it was a choice. Either that, or she’s so traumatised by her experience that it’s informed these… opinions.

ExtraHotDoubleShot · 11/10/2026 21:41

Pyjamatimenow · 11/10/2026 21:40

If you pay peanuts you get monkeys. When my father in law was dying the carers we had in were crap but then they were probably being paid very little. Who would want to do these types of jobs?

Very few people. This is why I can’t bring myself to judge - I don’t want to do it. So I can’t in all honesty expect somebody else to.

LoveHearts69 · 11/10/2026 21:41

ChunkyMonkey36 · 11/10/2026 20:31

Not all LD people are ND, or indeed vice versa.

I think considering a toddler recently drowned in a lake, we could perhaps make them harder to access.

But the same actually applies. What is the negative impact on your life if you can’t walk onto a motorway, or jump into a lake?

There absolutely is a level of responsibility for the person you’re caring for, and I have made clear in other posts that I personally accept that responsibility and neither take my son places he’s likely to put himself at physical risk, nor do I expect his school to.

But, arguing against keeping motorways and tigers away from people just seems like arguing for arguing’s sake.

Nobody actually wants to be in those spaces, unless they’ve got no understanding of risk or are willingly putting themselves at risk. You won’t miss out on not being able to walk into the M1. You don’t want to.

This makes no sense though. No one would be upset at not being able to walk onto a motorway. The point is that it would be impossible and at enormous cost to the tax payer to safeguard the entire world/anything that could potentially be a hazard. Also where do you draw the line? Should rocks and stones not be allowed on the planet because someone with LD may throw them? Do we need to barricade ourselves away from the sea?

It’s not feasible to turn the world into a giant soft play area. There will always be risks in anything. It’s our job to assess those and take responsibility for ourselves and the people we are caring for.

Imisscoffee2021 · 11/10/2026 21:44

DaisytheElephant · 11/10/2026 21:02

I’m normally a very empathetic person but I’ve got zero sympathy for the guy - regardless of whatever mental health condition or learning disabilities he had, he chose to put the lives of an innocent animal, bystanders and the zoo staff at risk. It wasn’t an accident, a woman tried to stop him and he ignored her. His actions have likely left the keepers and others who viewed it traumatised.

The description was he shrugged her off or rather kept going in his climbing g and she wasn't strong enough to stop him. This is classic for autistic people, you can't physically stop them if they're doing something they're focused on like that, particularly a grown man. He wouldn't have extrapolated that he was going to cause trauma to everyone watching and those working there, he was acting on his own instinctive nature within the boundaries of the world he lives in, and might not even understand death was a possibility. Which is not the world most of us do. I thought of my autistic nephew and how he behaves, it's so similar except he's a little boy. It's an awful situation for everyone including the deceased man, if it turns out he is autistic and with additional needs as he appeared to bystanders and on the video, it's an absolute tragedy. The only situation I couke hold any vitriol for the man is if he was neurotypical and doing it for likes, recording it or something. Not the case here.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread