Correct
No one knows if he had LD, but lets assume he did
Lets assume he had a DOLs and had carers
Lets assume he was utterly utterly obsessed with tigers and big cats and talked incessantly about being with them, wanting to cuddle them, being in an eclosure, perhaps had tried it before, etc etc
Any risk assessment would probably result in a decision not to take him to a wildlife park but perhaps do a different activity instead, just incase he decided to cause a problem, a scene or in fact try to climb in
On the other hand, lets assume this man is either not on a DOLs or that he had no such overt obsession and the risk of him climbing in to the enclosure was entirely unpredictable
Then it is no ones fault
I particularly love some of the comments here that he has been 'failed' - we could only say that if indeed he needed care or DOLs and that he had an obsession and history of dangerous behaviour like this.
And someone else makes the comment that someone with an IQ of less than 80 shouldnt be allowed out!!!