Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

School asking for flight details after unauthorised term-time absence abroad

653 replies

PersonalData · 20/09/2026 17:19

We went abroad mon-thu last week, ds (10) was in school the week before and went back on Friday. We let them know and obviously knew it would be unauthorised. As it was 8 sessions we don’t qualify for a fine. His attendance is usually 100%.

They asked on friday before and after for us to provide proof of the flights and other details for ‘safeguarding’ but he was back in school and clearly fine ?? We declined as this is private personal data. They replied back that we must submit the evidence by the end of tomorrow?

Is this usual ?

OP posts:
Fiftyandme · 21/09/2026 07:12

DrWhosJazzyScarf · 21/09/2026 07:07

My previous school would ask for this as well. Genuinely a safeguarding thing.

How?

BooksandSlippers · 21/09/2026 07:14

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 21/09/2026 07:04

This very long thread has shown that his saying safeguarding is not in itself a reason.

It hasn't shown that. It has shown lots of people don't understand safeguarding. This builds a picture and is a valid safeguarding question due to a child not being at school. Just because some people have clearly not had/understood safeguarding training, does not mean it is any less important.

notimagain · 21/09/2026 07:21

? If they flew to Egypt or Somalia or a country where FGM is rife

...and the cunning would book UK to Europe (e.g. Paris) and then onwards on an unconnected booking, perhaps with two separate operators and the school wouldn't have a scooby doo.

I know MN prides itself on critical thinking but there is precious little lateral thinking going on.

ItsCloudyToday · 21/09/2026 07:21

Oh for goodness sake, the school have to report this under Children Missing Education guidelines. They are not “just being nosey” 🙄

21ZIGGY · 21/09/2026 07:31

KeepPumping · 20/09/2026 21:25

Not really, it is part of the long journey back to common sense, your personal flight details have got fuck all to do with the school, their limit is that they can report too many days off that doesn"t tick whatever their current box is and they can be vigilant for and report signs of abuse or neglect to the appropriate authorities.

But they already know where you went, and for how long? What are they going to do with your flight details? I just could not be arsed to care about this

BurnoutGP · 21/09/2026 07:37

LlynTegid · 20/09/2026 17:24

Where you went can be disclosed such that it does not involve personal data. The school can then check that flights to the said airport do exist, which should be enough.

But why? Why on earth do they need these details. Its a big fat no from me. How on earth is it "safeguarding" (Im level 3 trained )

BurnoutGP · 21/09/2026 07:38

BooksandSlippers · 21/09/2026 07:14

It hasn't shown that. It has shown lots of people don't understand safeguarding. This builds a picture and is a valid safeguarding question due to a child not being at school. Just because some people have clearly not had/understood safeguarding training, does not mean it is any less important.

I am level 3 trained and have been for many years. Still can't see it.

PestoPastaLife · 21/09/2026 07:42

JLou08 · 20/09/2026 22:36

Only the police can remove a child from their parents without a court order. Police lead on investigations where there is a suspected crime. So, yes, police are needed if a child says they've been hit and you don't think they should go home.

Also @SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes

we are very rarely told we can’t send the child home. The problem is, schools have been completely disempowered from making these decisions ourselves and are just told refer, refer, refer. Remember Sara, remember Daniel. You must refer.

Then we refer, the social workers don’t respond and the police think we’re being hysterical.

We are piggies in the middle between angry parents we have to maintain working relationships with for the next 5+ years, and professionals who don’t seem to have any idea about the demands placed on schools.

JLou08 · 21/09/2026 07:51

PestoPastaLife · 21/09/2026 07:42

Also @SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes

we are very rarely told we can’t send the child home. The problem is, schools have been completely disempowered from making these decisions ourselves and are just told refer, refer, refer. Remember Sara, remember Daniel. You must refer.

Then we refer, the social workers don’t respond and the police think we’re being hysterical.

We are piggies in the middle between angry parents we have to maintain working relationships with for the next 5+ years, and professionals who don’t seem to have any idea about the demands placed on schools.

No social worker or police officer would ever ask a school to get flight numbers. If you feel you have too many demands and are being put in positions that damage relationships, you need to look at what arbitrary policies and procedures your own senior leaders and governing bodies are putting in place.

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 21/09/2026 07:55

BooksandSlippers · 21/09/2026 07:14

It hasn't shown that. It has shown lots of people don't understand safeguarding. This builds a picture and is a valid safeguarding question due to a child not being at school. Just because some people have clearly not had/understood safeguarding training, does not mean it is any less important.

Those on the thread who actually work in safeguarding, the sharp end of it, have been clear it's not safeguarding.

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 21/09/2026 07:57

PestoPastaLife · 21/09/2026 07:42

Also @SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes

we are very rarely told we can’t send the child home. The problem is, schools have been completely disempowered from making these decisions ourselves and are just told refer, refer, refer. Remember Sara, remember Daniel. You must refer.

Then we refer, the social workers don’t respond and the police think we’re being hysterical.

We are piggies in the middle between angry parents we have to maintain working relationships with for the next 5+ years, and professionals who don’t seem to have any idea about the demands placed on schools.

Social work/MASH will not respond to a referral in the same day unless it's urgent. Maybe you're saying that urgent referrals aren't responded to within the 4 hour guidelines in which case yes it's a serious issue but as I said they are not an emergency response service and never have been.

Libby1233455 · 21/09/2026 08:04

Fiftyandme · 21/09/2026 07:12

How?

Just read up thread or google.

JLou08 · 21/09/2026 08:05

BurnoutGP · 21/09/2026 07:38

I am level 3 trained and have been for many years. Still can't see it.

Multiple children's social workers on here too saying it's nothing to do with safeguarding with clear explanations as to why. But people who did their level 1 online safeguarding think they know more than those who completed a degree and work with safeguarding day in day out.

Rpop · 21/09/2026 08:11

Cheesehound · 20/09/2026 23:17

A referral from a school to social care because a parent wouldn’t share information about a holiday when the child is back in school and clearly safe and well would not go anywhere. Furthermore - social care would be asking the referrer if they had consent to make the referral, which I imagine in this case the OP would say no - so what then? A child protection enquiry because they said no, and when the child is absolutely fine? What a waste of time. If the school had concerns about a child going on holiday and being at risk of FGM or forced marriage that would be a completely different situation - but this is a big overreach from the school.

this is not at all what I was saying. The previous poster had said that schools are too busy and need to focus on education (and I assume they were suggesting too busy to get involved in asking about flights). I was making the point that it is precisely the school’s place in society that means they do take a role in safeguarding - and indeed they are! I am more than aware of how busy social care is and clearly this is being dealt with by the school- a quick screening question for the council (I assume it’s for the council) and all is done. I have not brought up social care referrals

Rpop · 21/09/2026 08:14

HowDoYouSolveAProblemLikeMyRear · 20/09/2026 23:35

If the school had explained that, instead of just repeating "safeguarding" with no explanation, then I'd have still thought the request was intrusive, but wouldn't have blamed the school.

I can't think of a reason why the school couldn't explain what you've just explained. It's helpful, clear, and entirely justifies why the school need the information.

Because not everyone at the school will remember or know. Some people on this thread are so awkward. The school have a process, some people know more about the exact details than others, just get on with it!

Rpop · 21/09/2026 08:21

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 21/09/2026 07:08

How does this make sense?
If they do provide flight details - what then? If they flew to Egypt or Somalia or a country where FGM is rife and they come from a culture where it is normalised and the child is a little girl - then there are red flags of course. But if the school suspected FGM then they should make the referral immediately with absolutely no need to wait to see flight details. And if the family are not from a culture where this is normal practice then why would seeing flight details have anything to do with FGM? and if they are from a culture where this is practiced but they flew to Málaga or Florida then what, all good? When still nothing is proven one way or another??

Someone further up the chain has decided on a procedure beyond our level of visibility. Arguing with it is pointless. “It’s my right” comments smack of an issue with authority. Just get on with it. I doubt OP took an interesting looking flight, so handover some numbers. And the school receptionist has enough to do, they will probably just keep saying “it’s safeguarding” - I doubt they drafted the local procedure and I doubt they recall the exact details.

DrWhosJazzyScarf · 21/09/2026 08:28

Fiftyandme · 21/09/2026 07:12

How?

CME (child missing in education) is a big safeguarding risk. Schools have a duty to know where children are if they’re not in attendance, especially for a period of time.

I taught in a particularly challenging area where girls would disappear to visit ‘aunties’ for FGM with little to no notice. Others disappeared for a day or two and were involved in county lines. When a child was off, we HAD to know exactly where they were.

Annoying though it may be in the moment to provide evidence, it’s simply a marker of a school that’s hot on safeguarding. Surely that’s no bad thing?

ItsCloudyToday · 21/09/2026 08:31

They have to prove that they did everything they could to find out why a child had an unauthorised absence, otherwise they will get pulled up on it.

PersonalData · 21/09/2026 08:37

Dh has sorted it out he went in early to speak to the head . I’ve asked for this to be deleted now

OP posts:
SomersetBrie · 21/09/2026 08:37

LivingMyLifeWithKindness · 20/09/2026 19:45

its a safeguarding requirement because the school needs evidence to support your information that they were as you say on a family holiday and not off school for some other reason. Schools don’t like the attendance requirements any more than parents do but still have to follow them. All that will happen to the info is that it will be stored securely on an online safeguarding system which only specially trained school designated safeguarding leads will be able to access.

When did this come in? My kids are in secondary now and I haven't taken them on holidays but I did in primary and it was fine.

Would you also be asking for train tickets or petrol if the holiday was within the UK?

Sereine · 21/09/2026 08:37

DrWhosJazzyScarf · 21/09/2026 07:07

My previous school would ask for this as well. Genuinely a safeguarding thing.

Did they explain how and why?

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 21/09/2026 08:41

ItsCloudyToday · 21/09/2026 08:31

They have to prove that they did everything they could to find out why a child had an unauthorised absence, otherwise they will get pulled up on it.

But this is about record keeping, not safeguarding.

Sereine · 21/09/2026 08:42

LydiaJayne · 20/09/2026 17:38

But they don't know they were away without proof. All they know is that the OP says they were away

OP told them the family was going abroad, and probably told them why. How does it help the school to have precise details of the flights?

What proof could they ask for if, say, OP had just driven to another area of the UK and stayed with relatives?

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 21/09/2026 08:42

PersonalData · 21/09/2026 08:37

Dh has sorted it out he went in early to speak to the head . I’ve asked for this to be deleted now

You're not going to tell us the outcome?

DrWhosJazzyScarf · 21/09/2026 08:44

Sereine · 21/09/2026 08:37

Did they explain how and why?

In short, CME. I’ve given a fuller explanation just below :)