Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

School asking for flight details after unauthorised term-time absence abroad

653 replies

PersonalData · 20/09/2026 17:19

We went abroad mon-thu last week, ds (10) was in school the week before and went back on Friday. We let them know and obviously knew it would be unauthorised. As it was 8 sessions we don’t qualify for a fine. His attendance is usually 100%.

They asked on friday before and after for us to provide proof of the flights and other details for ‘safeguarding’ but he was back in school and clearly fine ?? We declined as this is private personal data. They replied back that we must submit the evidence by the end of tomorrow?

Is this usual ?

OP posts:
TaptheCap · 20/09/2026 22:28

I wouldn't provide it. It's over stepping. If they have genuine concern that you kept your child off because of a non-accidental injury or such they should be making the referral to SS and letting them investigate, not investigating themselves.

tsmainsqueeze · 20/09/2026 22:32

What is so annoying about these bizarre requests is the total randomness of them.
There doesn't seem to be a school absence protocol template that is the same in every state school in the uk, if there were then every parent would know where they stand and any expectations for both school and parent.

JLou08 · 20/09/2026 22:36

PestoPastaLife · 20/09/2026 21:46

More accurate to say the police are not on call social workers, but when it’s 7pm on a Friday evening and you’ve been failing to get through to social workers for five hours and need someone “above” to say yes, it’s fine to send the child home to the dad they say had been hitting them, it’s police or bust.

Only the police can remove a child from their parents without a court order. Police lead on investigations where there is a suspected crime. So, yes, police are needed if a child says they've been hit and you don't think they should go home.

babyproblems · 20/09/2026 22:38

How on earth they have the time for this sort of policing I don’t know. Haven’t they got better things to do? I wouldn’t be giving them the information. They’re not the police and it’s overstepping hugely. I don’t understand how the schools in the uk think this sort of rationale is ok.. they are there to provide an education with a curriculum. They’re not the parent police!

echt · 20/09/2026 22:39

Not RTFT, only the OP's responses, but why not write to the school and ask for the jot and tittle of the law that says they are entitled to this information.

likelysuspect · 20/09/2026 22:40

SethAndReubenTooSendGaloshes · 20/09/2026 22:28

You know social workers can't actually agree for schools to withold children from people with PR in the absence of a court order? And if a child discloses abuse to you in school, of course you need to refer it to social services immediately but only police can actually provide immediate safeguarding to a child? I'm really unclear why you would be waiting 5 hours to ask a social worker if you can release a child to their parent after they disclosed physical abuse? And honestly, if you don't get a same day strat and a planned CP medical from a referral for physical abuse you need to be escalating that to the very top because that's a basic failure of the service which I literally can't imagine happening in my department, it would be unheard of.

Well exactly this, unless the police agree to PP to give us time to get an EPO, the child is going home.

However we're being told a lot by police now that they're full up for strats and cant fit us in same day a lot of the time, its causing huge problems.

autumnboys · 20/09/2026 22:42

PersonalData · 20/09/2026 17:23

We are luckily just under the 10 sessions threshold for a fine !

I think it’s 10 unauthorised sessions in 10 weeks, so if you had/have more in the ten weeks either side of your holiday, you could still be finded.

Sereine · 20/09/2026 22:44

Surprisinglynice · 20/09/2026 17:23

You trust the school? A good relationship with them? Long standing? Never any issues?

if yes to all of the above - just trust they they’re asking because for some reason they need to report it

They don't need to report it, though.

Venicelagoon · 20/09/2026 22:48

OP should realise there is a government rule about holidays during term time should only be taken "in exceptional circumstances".

OP presumably went ahead anyway despite no exceptional circumstances.

Sereine · 20/09/2026 22:51

Venicelagoon · 20/09/2026 22:24

Personally if I were OP it would bother me more to be asked by a school to do all those other daft things schools demand these days....like the dressing up in costumes for World Book Day for instance. Id also be bothered about all the education missed due to child being taken out of school following an 8 week Summer vacation.

Why do you think OP's child has had an 8 week vacation? There's no indication that he is in a private school.

likelysuspect · 20/09/2026 22:52

Venicelagoon · 20/09/2026 22:48

OP should realise there is a government rule about holidays during term time should only be taken "in exceptional circumstances".

OP presumably went ahead anyway despite no exceptional circumstances.

The exceptional circumstances is for a school to be able to authorise it, like funerals etc

This isnt authorised. Its unauthorised but wont incur a fine due to it not meeting the 10 sessions.

I used to be very sniffy about parents taking their kids out of school for holidays but changed my mind when children's education and socialisation didnt seem to matter during covid.

pinkksugarmouse · 20/09/2026 23:01

I would be asking what exactly they mean by safeguarding.

Rpop · 20/09/2026 23:02

Pipersgirl · 20/09/2026 20:06

Jesus this thread is depressing.

Someone compared schools taking care of children’s welfare to bin men. It’s hardly an accurate parallel is it?
‘Bollocks to them they have zero authority over you’.
I mean, is it any wonder we have a crisis in employing educators if this is the attitude towards them? They take care of the newest generation, and they try to keep everyone safe- and when they slip up, HORROR HAPPENS. Baby P happens, Sara Sharif happens- the stakes are so damn high, should we as society not do everything in our power to support the schools in any way they feel necessary?
The entitlement on this thread is MIND BLOWING. People who cannot see further than their own little bubble to consider that some parents are not what they seem, that abuse happens in plain sight. All these posters saying ‘ahh no previous, no past concerns’- how do you think the bloody background picture gets built? The bigger picture is made up of tiny things- an off feeling here, an absence here. These things can only be put together with DOCUMENTATION! Imagine - if there were other mild concerns raised to social services later down the line- would those mild concerns mount up to big concerns if there were absences scattered with refusal to provide evidence? Would all these seemingly OTT tick boxes provide a clearer background on a trail of abuse? Would it build the evidence which might one day help keep a child safe?
The ones saying this short absence should not be a concern (I agree it likely isn’t- but surely providing a flight number/ticket is so unbelievably easy, that anyone with nothing to hide would just…do it?) and cannot fathom why documentation might be needed are not understanding where the ability to build the big picture comes from.

I love how a forum full of internet strangers are so quick to condemn schools as over-inflated big heads who should know their place (with the bin men apparently?).
You all have rushed to tell a mum who has removed her child from school in the first 3 weeks of the school year for the sake of cheaper Turkey teef that the school are overstepping and to blame here, without knowing any background information about the family at all. I only hope the safeguarding teams at schools have more critical thinking skills and ability to think outside the (tick)box than you lot.
I honestly despair for society…

I agree that the system is trying to do its best and we should just do what is asked. You have put it very well. I choose to see the good in what my school, community and society is trying to do. They are not asking for this for fun. They have clearly been told they have to. Whether or not it seems odd to you, you don’t have visibility of the bigger picture. I honestly think you will make things more complicated if you turn this into an issue. I couldn’t give two hoots who saw my flight details.

Cocoknew · 20/09/2026 23:03

I would understand if there was a genuine safeguarding concern but it seems like the education system is overstepping into people’s lives. I think it’s educational for children to have a holiday the same way that life skills are important. A few years back schools were closed for six months now we need to tell them every detail unnecessarily. I would ignore.

Rpop · 20/09/2026 23:04

babyproblems · 20/09/2026 22:38

How on earth they have the time for this sort of policing I don’t know. Haven’t they got better things to do? I wouldn’t be giving them the information. They’re not the police and it’s overstepping hugely. I don’t understand how the schools in the uk think this sort of rationale is ok.. they are there to provide an education with a curriculum. They’re not the parent police!

Well actually it is all of our responsibility to safeguard the vulnerable in society. The school is a pivotal institution in collecting and recording and communicating data. They are critical in supporting the safeguarding our children.

Cheesehound · 20/09/2026 23:08

Telecone · 20/09/2026 17:22

Just tell them and don't be awkward. Unless it's life or death you don't need a holiday the first week of term.

Many parents have reasons for taking their child out of school at any time in the academic year. I wouldn’t be sending my details of my holiday to the school. What are they going to do if the OP doesn’t? Send a referral to social care? Ridiculous.

AmnesiacsDream · 20/09/2026 23:09

Venicelagoon · 20/09/2026 22:48

OP should realise there is a government rule about holidays during term time should only be taken "in exceptional circumstances".

OP presumably went ahead anyway despite no exceptional circumstances.

And the relevance of that to whether OP has to provide them with flight details is…?

blondeboobshell · 20/09/2026 23:10

I would remind them that best practice for data protection is to only hold information that is necessary. I’d ask them for a more detailed explanation as to why they need your private information and how they intend to store it/ how long they want to keep it for and how will they protect your privacy/ who will have access to it. I’d also ask to see the policy that states this is an appropriate request.

if they do not answer sufficiently just ask for more clarification

user86757488388 · 20/09/2026 23:14

I can't understand why you wouldn't just provide it. You entrust your child to them on a daily basis. Who cares if they see your flight booking confirmation? If you have a smart phone or a smart watch or, indeed, have ever bought anything online there is way more damaging personal data about you in much more suspect hands.

Schools and teachers have enough on their plates. Why not just make their life easy and send them a copy of your flight confirmation instead of making them scrounge around for details like how tan your son is or how white your teeth are.

What a waste of time and energy.

Cheesehound · 20/09/2026 23:17

Rpop · 20/09/2026 23:04

Well actually it is all of our responsibility to safeguard the vulnerable in society. The school is a pivotal institution in collecting and recording and communicating data. They are critical in supporting the safeguarding our children.

A referral from a school to social care because a parent wouldn’t share information about a holiday when the child is back in school and clearly safe and well would not go anywhere. Furthermore - social care would be asking the referrer if they had consent to make the referral, which I imagine in this case the OP would say no - so what then? A child protection enquiry because they said no, and when the child is absolutely fine? What a waste of time. If the school had concerns about a child going on holiday and being at risk of FGM or forced marriage that would be a completely different situation - but this is a big overreach from the school.

PrettyPickle · 20/09/2026 23:20

No, it’s not usual. Schools can ask why a child was absent for safeguarding reasons, but once he’s back in school and clearly safe, they don’t need flight details or travel documents. That’s private personal data and you’re right to decline.

Safeguarding is about confirming the child wasn’t missing or at risk - not about collecting boarding passes or itineraries. They can record the absence as unauthorised (which you already accepted), but they can’t insist on proof of flights, especially when he’s back in class and fine.

You’ve already told them he was with you and he’s now in school. That fulfils their safeguarding duty. Asking for travel evidence is overreach, not a requirement.

VividPinkTraybake · 20/09/2026 23:33

Surprisinglynice · 20/09/2026 17:23

You trust the school? A good relationship with them? Long standing? Never any issues?

if yes to all of the above - just trust they they’re asking because for some reason they need to report it

Aye, people on here just live drama and are trying to make the o.p ruin relationships with the school so that they can play at being Spartacus

HowDoYouSolveAProblemLikeMyRear · 20/09/2026 23:35

PestoPastaLife · 20/09/2026 21:16

As of September 2026 the updated Keeping Children Safe in Education rules have “upgraded” attendance to a core safeguarding issue rather than just another metric, so yes, schools are required to show they have done everything possible to get proof of where children are if missing from school.

If Ofsted asked what they had done to safeguard your child when he was missing for four days at the start of term, they would be hung out to dry for anything less than what they have asked for.

If the school had explained that, instead of just repeating "safeguarding" with no explanation, then I'd have still thought the request was intrusive, but wouldn't have blamed the school.

I can't think of a reason why the school couldn't explain what you've just explained. It's helpful, clear, and entirely justifies why the school need the information.

AmnesiacsDream · 20/09/2026 23:35

Pipersgirl · 20/09/2026 20:06

Jesus this thread is depressing.

Someone compared schools taking care of children’s welfare to bin men. It’s hardly an accurate parallel is it?
‘Bollocks to them they have zero authority over you’.
I mean, is it any wonder we have a crisis in employing educators if this is the attitude towards them? They take care of the newest generation, and they try to keep everyone safe- and when they slip up, HORROR HAPPENS. Baby P happens, Sara Sharif happens- the stakes are so damn high, should we as society not do everything in our power to support the schools in any way they feel necessary?
The entitlement on this thread is MIND BLOWING. People who cannot see further than their own little bubble to consider that some parents are not what they seem, that abuse happens in plain sight. All these posters saying ‘ahh no previous, no past concerns’- how do you think the bloody background picture gets built? The bigger picture is made up of tiny things- an off feeling here, an absence here. These things can only be put together with DOCUMENTATION! Imagine - if there were other mild concerns raised to social services later down the line- would those mild concerns mount up to big concerns if there were absences scattered with refusal to provide evidence? Would all these seemingly OTT tick boxes provide a clearer background on a trail of abuse? Would it build the evidence which might one day help keep a child safe?
The ones saying this short absence should not be a concern (I agree it likely isn’t- but surely providing a flight number/ticket is so unbelievably easy, that anyone with nothing to hide would just…do it?) and cannot fathom why documentation might be needed are not understanding where the ability to build the big picture comes from.

I love how a forum full of internet strangers are so quick to condemn schools as over-inflated big heads who should know their place (with the bin men apparently?).
You all have rushed to tell a mum who has removed her child from school in the first 3 weeks of the school year for the sake of cheaper Turkey teef that the school are overstepping and to blame here, without knowing any background information about the family at all. I only hope the safeguarding teams at schools have more critical thinking skills and ability to think outside the (tick)box than you lot.
I honestly despair for society…

Crisis employing educators is more likely to be down to excessive and pointless box ticking paperwork than someone not wanting to pass on details of their private family life.

Thingcanonlygetbetter · 20/09/2026 23:36

Do you live in the 1940’s Nazi German state. It would be a hill to die on for me. I would just refuse.