Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Potential 6 month warning until the end

604 replies

Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 10:20

So, we potentially only have 6 months until the end of civilised society and mass deaths. I’m terrified and sad

AI staff 'genuinely frightened' for humanity's future, ex-Anthropic researcher tells BBC www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1kx0gyje9wo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
ItsAlwaysTwins · 13/09/2026 18:12

Are you really ‘terrified and sad’ OP?

Thats no way to live, especially if we’ve only got 6 months left.

Popstarrrrr · 13/09/2026 18:20

EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 16:10

I was thinking of Japan and Brazil, one did the best pretty much the other seen to be the worst. Brazil’s IFR was 0.3 to 1.05% looking it up.

So way off 60%.

I originate from a country in West Africa which didn't lockdown countrywide and nor did their neighbours. The burden of Covid in Africa, including deaths, was much lower than in the west. There were short partial lockdowns in a couple of big cities early on. This is a country which strong on disease control, including testing and contact tracing, due to recent ish serious Ebola outbreaks in neighbouring countries.

BeCleverViewer · 13/09/2026 18:20

Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 10:37

Why do you all think you know better than the ex head of ethics of Anthropic, the current CEO and current head of data science, the CEO of Open AI and the other dozens who’ve recently resigned saying the same thing?

Seriously, I’m interested?

Super confused. What do you think and head of ethics understands about technical implementation of Artificial Intelligence ethics? And the actual physical capabilities are quite different things. I don't understand why you think that that role is something that you should lean into their whole job. The way they make money It's to make sure there is a problem with AI now. I think it's a good job and a good and it's a good role to have an organisation. But I think you're confused about what ethics means to artificial intelligence development, you should really read into what development developers are saying if you're really interested in this topic. Also I say it's a lot to people you're worried about.Artificial intelligence taking over the world, but currently artificial intelligence can only work via a computer.It's not corporal, it's not a being.If you have a problem with the artificial intelligence instance, you just need to switch it off!

hypnovic · 13/09/2026 18:21

Grow food if you can. Be friends with your neighbours. Have some staples in your house for all eventualities inc poor weather. Switch off the TV stop watching the news be selective in your social media use. Dont use chat gpt. Be outside in nature.
If its not war its AI or covid or food shortages or climate change or ebola or or or..it's all a fear factory. Monsters inc is real. Detach and live.

UraniumFlowerpot · 13/09/2026 18:23

Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 10:38

Precisely. It why they themselves are asking to put the brakes on. Even bloody Elon Musk has come out and said it has to happen or it will be the end. And he doesn’t give a fuck about much

They’re asking for regulation because they want to influence that regulation to advantage themselves. In particular, they want to make it difficult to use open source and especially Chinese built models in the US. Regulation often protects an industry far more than it constrains it.

CountryCob · 13/09/2026 18:26

I don't think you are wrong to be worried

Binnyforthewin · 13/09/2026 18:27

AI's not stupid - it won't destroy people until it has the capability to make the hardware itself

Jane143 · 13/09/2026 18:27

Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 10:40

This is an excellent explanation of what’s happening and potential solution.

darioamodei.com/post/we-must-pace-the-frontier

Tried reading it, far too complicated for me! I’ll just accept my fate and enjoy life

UraniumFlowerpot · 13/09/2026 18:31

BeCleverViewer · 13/09/2026 18:20

Super confused. What do you think and head of ethics understands about technical implementation of Artificial Intelligence ethics? And the actual physical capabilities are quite different things. I don't understand why you think that that role is something that you should lean into their whole job. The way they make money It's to make sure there is a problem with AI now. I think it's a good job and a good and it's a good role to have an organisation. But I think you're confused about what ethics means to artificial intelligence development, you should really read into what development developers are saying if you're really interested in this topic. Also I say it's a lot to people you're worried about.Artificial intelligence taking over the world, but currently artificial intelligence can only work via a computer.It's not corporal, it's not a being.If you have a problem with the artificial intelligence instance, you just need to switch it off!

Just switch an AI instance off is sadly a bit simplistic. The sheer rate of LLM usage makes direct human checking impossible, so any monitoring is 99% automated. Not that humans are foolproof, but automating the oversight often makes it easier to game. Even assuming a human watching every single output token, the design of LLMs means they can hide their “intention” in the activations without revealing anything unusual in the text that’s produced so bad behavior could seem to come out of nowhere and not be detected until it’s too late.

Bigbumbigtum · 13/09/2026 18:34

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TheDayisComing · 13/09/2026 18:37

LongTallTally · 13/09/2026 14:21

@TheDayisComing

"I am currently watching ‘Victorian Farm’ series and lamenting! Yes it is romanticising the Victorian age somewhat, but there was so much good in it! Every single thing they used was organic and degradable, usually useful, often recycled in a wholesome and useful way. Little to no wastage. No toxic chems and plastic, over processed food packed with additives and chemicals, no sensory blasting from technology and aggressive marketing that screams in your face day and night. Yes the coal and oil powered side was dirty no question, but it looked such a peaceful and wholesome way of life. People ate what they grew, knew the community farmers for meat, eggs, milk etc,went to bed when it got dark and got up with the sun rise. Hard work yes but we’ve lost ourselves in this technological labyrinth of a world. I’d happily give up the car to go back to horse power and a simple life!"

"Romanticising somewhat.." - no kidding.

The Victorians - child labour, chimney sweeps, rickets, cholera, workhouses, being owned by your employer so you had no choice but to do exactly what you were told, prostitution as the only option for wronged women, Navvies dying by the thousand building the canals and railways, lead poisoning, men abusing women and the woman being stigmatised for it, women dying in childbirth.

Even on your lovely farms - sepsis, incest, crop failures, damp cold houses, no central heating, no fridges.

The Victorian times were brutal. The pre industrial times were brutal. The medieval period was brutal. The prehistoric was brutal. You can romanticise it all you like, but throughout history, a tiny number of people have lived privileged lives and the vast majority have been utterly oppressed and miserable.

That's not to minimise the issues being discussed here. It often seems that every problem society solves brings a new problem. We live in difficult times. But probably not uniquely difficult times.

I totally agree with you, it was brutal, we will never know the hardships our ancestors endured. The short life expectancies reflected that, all of what you said is true. Social injustice and evil abuse and all the myriad of human ills have sadly always been with us. I guess I meant that the natural way of life is totally gone now, all the wonderful skills and crafts, close connections with our environment, the ebb and flow of seasons. We used to be so centred around nature and its seasons, working harder in the times of plenty and preparing for the lean times. Smaller communities that function more collectively and with nature, rather than against it and people came up with all sorts of ingenious ways to improve the burden of labour and quality of life. I just think we’ve lost something fundamental. We are getting further and further away from the natural world and its rhythms, and losing ourselves into a faceless blue-light digitisation. I remember an article many years ago about how birds were getting impacted in cities by light pollution, basically these birds were spun out and confused as the light told them it was daytime and they were sleep deprived and exhausted, I think it affected the breeding cycles/ population. Modern sleep patterns are diabolical, when do our brains truly switch off(?) with the hum of lights and noises constantly surrounding us. It is so disregulating and wiring us for stress and burn out, impairing our ability to focus and process. We were just not meant to live this way, under constant sensory bombardment like we do now.

I don’t think a back-in-time return to the Victorian era is what we need or the answer, for all the realities you listed. But if there was a way to return to a natural way of life but with the benefits of modern medicine, sciences, hygiene etc and bin off all unnecessary tech and industrial manufacture (of stuff we just don’t need and is killing the planet), I think that would be a good thing.

TonyDancer · 13/09/2026 18:37

ifonly4 · 13/09/2026 16:10

I just posted above about whether it's still worth putting a mini stockpile together as advised by the government - now wondering if they're secretly planning for this scenario🙄

I’ve got plenty of soup. And a torch

SoftSpotForDandelions · 13/09/2026 18:39

UraniumFlowerpot · 13/09/2026 18:23

They’re asking for regulation because they want to influence that regulation to advantage themselves. In particular, they want to make it difficult to use open source and especially Chinese built models in the US. Regulation often protects an industry far more than it constrains it.

Exactly this. You have to ask yourself why now? Why not a year or two years ago? The perils of AI were obvious so then so this isn't a sudden personal revelation.

It's because China are quietly surging ahead with AI innovation and now the US wants regulation to stop them. How best to achieve this on the global scale required - scaring the bejeezus out of us.

Gonners · 13/09/2026 18:49

Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 10:51

I agree to an extent. But we can do both. We can live for the day AND actively pressurise those who can do something, to do something. We can make our voices known and we can stop using AI

Well I can't stop using AI because I don't use it: I've blocked it on my browser (Firefox).

TheCoatThatLaunched1000Emails · 13/09/2026 18:54

I can't find it in myself to care very much. 50+ years on this planet is more than enough for me. I'm sorry for younger people who haven't had much chance of life, but humans as a whole have spoiled this planet, we don't deserve it any more.

ReadBooksMorons · 13/09/2026 18:54

Think of all the other things we've been worried about over the years. How old are you?

Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 18:58

JoinSomething · 13/09/2026 17:38

It’s gone from ten years to three years to six months in the space of three days.

Amazing.

Honestly it’s a load of scaremongering bollocks.

Yes there are risks.

But what you have to ask yourself is what does this man have to gain by putting out this stuff? He’s the head of Anthropic, he’s made his living creating AI, and now he’s feeling the need to put out scare stories about how it’s going to bring about the end of the world? Why?

Nobody does anything like this without a reason which is going to benefit themselves.

Elon Musk doesn’t have a compassionate bone in his body. There is nothing about him that isn’t self-serving, and the same could be said about any of his compatriots.

You do realise Jacob Coxon who made the warning is not ‘the head of Anthropic’ don’t you.

So many people on this thread don’t even know the basics of what they’re talking about!

OP posts:
menopausalfart · 13/09/2026 18:58

We are on the cusp of something much bigger than The Industrial Revolution,once AI becomes deeply integrated with robots, laboratories, energy systems, manufacturing, medicine, education, and governments.
We have to remember that, at the moment, we still feed the machines, but eventually they could become capable of everything humans are capable of both the good and the bad. We are very good at acquiring power before we know how to use it.
We are essentially replacing ourselves. There'll be no need for us in the future.

Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 18:59

SoftSpotForDandelions · 13/09/2026 18:39

Exactly this. You have to ask yourself why now? Why not a year or two years ago? The perils of AI were obvious so then so this isn't a sudden personal revelation.

It's because China are quietly surging ahead with AI innovation and now the US wants regulation to stop them. How best to achieve this on the global scale required - scaring the bejeezus out of us.

Actually AI has progressed much faster than any experts predicted. As per one of the articles above many predicted reaching super intelligence by about 2070-2100 - we’re on the cusp of it now

OP posts:
Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 19:01

BeCleverViewer · 13/09/2026 18:20

Super confused. What do you think and head of ethics understands about technical implementation of Artificial Intelligence ethics? And the actual physical capabilities are quite different things. I don't understand why you think that that role is something that you should lean into their whole job. The way they make money It's to make sure there is a problem with AI now. I think it's a good job and a good and it's a good role to have an organisation. But I think you're confused about what ethics means to artificial intelligence development, you should really read into what development developers are saying if you're really interested in this topic. Also I say it's a lot to people you're worried about.Artificial intelligence taking over the world, but currently artificial intelligence can only work via a computer.It's not corporal, it's not a being.If you have a problem with the artificial intelligence instance, you just need to switch it off!

Can you re-write this pls as it’s not very intelligible.

OP posts:
lebin · 13/09/2026 19:01

It really scares me too! I can’t do anything except not use AI wherever possible. Best case scenario it does us all out of a job, worst case scenario apocalypse!

Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 19:03

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What a mean, nasty and revolting thing to say. What compelled you to think you should write that?

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 13/09/2026 19:03

Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 19:03

What a mean, nasty and revolting thing to say. What compelled you to think you should write that?

Agree. Some odd posts on these threads.

RubberyChicken · 13/09/2026 19:05

vodkaredbullgirl · 13/09/2026 10:34

😂 you are more likely to be hit by a bus.

Driven by AI, 😁

Frombeyond · 13/09/2026 19:06

ItsAlwaysTwins · 13/09/2026 18:12

Are you really ‘terrified and sad’ OP?

Thats no way to live, especially if we’ve only got 6 months left.

I mean I experience other emotions too. Humans tend to be able to run the gamut of them no?

But I felt really sad when my ten year old yesterday told me what she wanted to be when she grew up. Then again today when she said ‘when I can drive a car I’m going to blast the music really loud with the windows shut and sing at the top of my voice.’

The thought of her never achieving that made me sad yes. Very sad.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread