Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Labour isn't Working - Thread 35

482 replies

Nuthatch26 · 18/06/2026 14:38

A chat thread for those who don't like this Labour* *government. 💙

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Previous thread
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/_chat/5538300-labour-isnt-working-thread-34?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=share

Labour isn't Working - Thread 35
OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
Upstartled · Yesterday 17:27

Kemi will definitely be able to make hay with the economic argument as the left of the labour demand that Burnham puts his Corbyn hat on and tax the life out of everything.

The plp and the electorate are miles apart on this and Kemi is the only one with a sensible economic outlook to fill the gap.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · Yesterday 17:35

I wouldn’t be opposed to an income tax increase if it’s adequately explained in terms of budget and allocation AND there’s downward pressure on welfare spending.

Defence needs billions so on a simple basis it could be 1p more in income tax for the military, with significant cuts elsewhere to accompany it.

Of course I’d rather the tax burden reduced, but I can’t see appreciable growth happening for a couple of years at least.

If we end up with tax for tax sake plus some fiddling of NHS waiting list figures - like with Reeves - there will be a very unpleasant electoral reckoning for Labour.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 17:43

An income tax increase would be pretty bad politically.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

CaveMum · Yesterday 17:45

I have no issue with tax going up, I’m teetering on the brink of the 40% tax rate so not a massively high earner.

My proviso is that they can’t just keep hitting the top - putting up basic rate by 1p/2p will make far more difference to the exchequer than just sticking it on the top rate.

NoWordForFluffy · Yesterday 17:46

EasternStandard · Yesterday 17:43

An income tax increase would be pretty bad politically.

They're already buggered unless things drastically improve. They just need to do what they need to do to raise the money now, IMO. They should never have promised no tax rises in their manifesto.

If they raise the personal allowance alongside it, it might go down a bit better.

NoWordForFluffy · Yesterday 17:48

Upstartled · Yesterday 16:56

Interesting piece on Labour List by Al Carns.

The next leader has to govern differently' - LabourList https://share.google/kTlQxxwAw93rr7qRc

I don't know if he is just jockeying for a ministerial position but I do think he writes persuasively and the youth triple lock and consigning NEETs to history is strong.

Interesting. Sensible. I could get on board with this kind of talk!

WildClover · Yesterday 17:56

Upstartled · Yesterday 16:56

Interesting piece on Labour List by Al Carns.

The next leader has to govern differently' - LabourList https://share.google/kTlQxxwAw93rr7qRc

I don't know if he is just jockeying for a ministerial position but I do think he writes persuasively and the youth triple lock and consigning NEETs to history is strong.

I like that..interesting idea on student debt into house deposit, although no idea how that would work.

Nuthatch26 · Yesterday 17:56

CaveMum · Yesterday 17:13

I listened to Ed & George’s Hot Take earlier.

Ed said he thought that the next few weeks will see lots of jockeying from minor players who want a good job. They’ll talk about wanting there to be a robust debate and get themselves on all the tv/radio shows but when it comes to actually putting their name forward by 16 July they’ll proclaim to have seen the light re Andy and throw their support behind him.

He also implied Labour would look very silly if not a single woman put themselves forward, even if only to be part of the debate.

I just listened to this on my way home, along with Daily T and State of It.
I was quite surprised at the consensus from all that Starmer's resignation speech was awful. They all pointed to his lack of contrition.

Other things I've heard and read today are that Starmer never credits any of his cabinet with any success, also evident in his speech today. If it goes well, its him, if it goes wrong, someone else is to blame. Also patting himself on the back for lifting the 2 child cap, when he was forced to by his MPs (and suspended some) hasn't gone down well.

OP posts:
Nuthatch26 · Yesterday 18:01

WildClover · Yesterday 17:56

I like that..interesting idea on student debt into house deposit, although no idea how that would work.

Isn't that similar to what Kemi has pledged on refunding NI to young people?

OP posts:
Nuthatch26 · Yesterday 18:13

Reeves next to resign? Or will she wait until she's pushed.

We will never know how the nation would have fared under a different government, but much of our economic misery has undisputedly been self-inflicted.
Yet it has never been the chancellor’s fault: the Tories; Trump’s tariffs; the Iran war — the excuses kept on coming. The reality is perhaps that the economy has persevered in spite of the challenges the chancellor piled on them.

https://www.thetimes.com/article/bfa7a2ce-5ff4-4813-a1ac-e26165a204b6?shareToken=233a03c85845481ebdbd5d448157400a

So long, Rachel Reeves — living proof that politics and economics don’t mix

With a new PM around the corner, chances are that the chancellor is not long for these parts. Here’s why I won’t be sad to see her go

https://www.thetimes.com/article/bfa7a2ce-5ff4-4813-a1ac-e26165a204b6?shareToken=233a03c85845481ebdbd5d448157400a

OP posts:
Upstartled · Yesterday 18:31

Nuthatch26 · Yesterday 18:13

Reeves next to resign? Or will she wait until she's pushed.

We will never know how the nation would have fared under a different government, but much of our economic misery has undisputedly been self-inflicted.
Yet it has never been the chancellor’s fault: the Tories; Trump’s tariffs; the Iran war — the excuses kept on coming. The reality is perhaps that the economy has persevered in spite of the challenges the chancellor piled on them.

https://www.thetimes.com/article/bfa7a2ce-5ff4-4813-a1ac-e26165a204b6?shareToken=233a03c85845481ebdbd5d448157400a

Yeah, let's hope so. Reeves lost all her credibility at the first autumn budget and then it just got worse and worse. The charade last year when she dragged out the budget, leaving industry paralysed while they drip fed bollocks through the media to see what floated and the emergency breakfast statement - that was just a performance to hoodwink the markets. 🙄 Sooner she is gone, the better.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 18:32

Someone Labour said it would be hard for Reeves to stay as she’s so closely aligned with Starmer.

Nuthatch26 · Yesterday 18:38

EasternStandard · Yesterday 18:32

Someone Labour said it would be hard for Reeves to stay as she’s so closely aligned with Starmer.

Burnham would be mad to keep her on.

OP posts:
NoWordForFluffy · Yesterday 18:58

Upstartled · Yesterday 18:31

Yeah, let's hope so. Reeves lost all her credibility at the first autumn budget and then it just got worse and worse. The charade last year when she dragged out the budget, leaving industry paralysed while they drip fed bollocks through the media to see what floated and the emergency breakfast statement - that was just a performance to hoodwink the markets. 🙄 Sooner she is gone, the better.

The new chancellor is going to face to unpick the holy mess Reeves has made. Don't envy them that job!

Middlerage · Yesterday 19:12

I don’t especially want to pay more tax but, if they have a plan to spend it on sensible things and don’t sneer about it being fair to clobber people yet again….as if they’re righting a perceived wrong by taxing already highly taxed people..that would help!

justasking111 · Yesterday 19:18

Parliament breaks up on 16 July until 1 September. Do we get a new prime minister before then or after.

Badbadbunny · Yesterday 19:18

NoWordForFluffy · Yesterday 17:46

They're already buggered unless things drastically improve. They just need to do what they need to do to raise the money now, IMO. They should never have promised no tax rises in their manifesto.

If they raise the personal allowance alongside it, it might go down a bit better.

Yup, the no tax rises for working people was a stupid thing to put in the manifesto. Labour would have won anyway given how Rishi lost a huge amount of Tory voters.

A small tax rise across everyone is probably acceptable, but as usual, if there are lots of exemptions for certain groups/demographics, it won't be popular. The broader the better, so maybe a percent or two on VAT rather than income tax.

Or if they're going to change income tax, then scrap NIC and raise income tax by a few percent so that "working" people aren't hammered, i.e. reduction in partly compensates the increase in income tax.

Badbadbunny · Yesterday 19:19

NoWordForFluffy · Yesterday 18:58

The new chancellor is going to face to unpick the holy mess Reeves has made. Don't envy them that job!

Yup, Reeves has been utterly awful and incompetent. Got to hope that Burnham has someone lined up who will actually bother to understand the job, do lots of research and not be blinkered by sixth form level politics of envy! Lets hope it's not Miliband - now that would be a disaster.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · Yesterday 19:39

Nuthatch26 · Yesterday 17:56

I just listened to this on my way home, along with Daily T and State of It.
I was quite surprised at the consensus from all that Starmer's resignation speech was awful. They all pointed to his lack of contrition.

Other things I've heard and read today are that Starmer never credits any of his cabinet with any success, also evident in his speech today. If it goes well, its him, if it goes wrong, someone else is to blame. Also patting himself on the back for lifting the 2 child cap, when he was forced to by his MPs (and suspended some) hasn't gone down well.

That’s been his whole political persona from day one.

He says he takes responsibility and then…sacks someone.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · Yesterday 20:03

Nuthatch26 · Yesterday 18:38

Burnham would be mad to keep her on.

Having both Reeves and Starmer out would improve the quality of government speech no end. What a bonus!

EasternStandard · Yesterday 21:22

Mn is nuts rn. So angry over Starmer.

NoWordForFluffy · Yesterday 21:31

EasternStandard · Yesterday 21:22

Mn is nuts rn. So angry over Starmer.

They all need to get a grip! He wasn't the messiah, he was a rather mediocre bloke who wasn't adept at politics. Never mind, move on.

justasking111 · Yesterday 21:36

Was listening to a labour MP the other evening. West country I think. He was saying that there was a wealth of talent amongst the 411 members which should be utilised now. They've been in place long enough to start moving them onto greater work. Pp said the other day that a junior minister had only met Starmer once!!! Sorry it's not good enough to treat them like mushrooms.

PaperTyger · Yesterday 21:43

Id like to see a crack down on fraud first before taxes rise and net zero budget reduced as well.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 21:44

NoWordForFluffy · Yesterday 21:31

They all need to get a grip! He wasn't the messiah, he was a rather mediocre bloke who wasn't adept at politics. Never mind, move on.

Agree they need to let it go already. He was mediocre, but also arrogant, sneering and sacked anyone he could to survive. The electorate funnily enough said no to that.

Swipe left for the next trending thread