I started a thread a couple of weeks ago complaining about people who tell you how rubbish they 'know' Eurovision is, even though they clearly haven't watched it for decades/ever, yet they assume they are the experts who know more than the actual fans.
I fully accept that brevity isn't my strong point; but I was laying out several of the tired, cliched proclamations that are always trotted out and my responses to them.
The thread got completely sidetracked by people declaring with confidence that I'd obviously used AI for my OP, and even arguing with me when I said that I personally hate AI - it would no more occur to me to start an OP using AI than it would to write it in Japanese (which I assuredly do not speak). They picked up on my use of speech marks and italics as 'proof' that it must be a robot, as apparently actual people just wouldn't be able to do this!!
I can only assume that, if you can put together a couple of coherent paragraphs that aren't liberally littered with SPAG errors and slang, some people cannot fathom that plenty of us did go to school and are confident in using our native language all on our own.
I did consider starting another thread in Site Stuff calling for AI-hunting to be banned the same as troll-hunting is. It's so tedious and really does detract from the point being discussed.
Maybe it's a new online 'sport' for bored people with far too much time on their hands - the same as the people who search for a thread that doesn't interest them and then eagerly choose to engage and participate in that thread purely to tell the people on it that it doesn't interest them! I suppose it could also be some kind of Main Character Syndrome, whereby they just cannot understand that the internet is for the entire world - billions of people - and thus that a great deal of it won't be all about them or relevant/interesting to them.