Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Where’s the threads discussing Louise Thompson?

87 replies

Fedup360 · 16/05/2026 09:08

Expected to come on here and see some threads but there don’t seem to be any? So I’ll be the one to start it. Thoughts?

OP posts:
Cosleepingadvice · 16/05/2026 19:32

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 16/05/2026 19:25

So she’s a talentless reality nobody who is going to buy a baby. Fucking hell.

I never said she was a talentless reality nobody. I never watched Made In Chelsea so im not sure of her background. But I do find it very uncomfortable that she's happy to put someone at risk. I personally went through infertility so I understand the desire for a child and had a difficult pregnancy (nothing on her scale but my DC needed NICU care). I wouldn't wish that on anyone which is why I find it strange that surrogacy is the route she is following. Obviously it's her choice but OP asked for opinions and thats mine 🤷🏻‍♀️

These people have had careers that many have dreamed of - i think there's something to be said about knowing when its time to take a step back and appreciate the life you have.

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 16/05/2026 19:34

Cosleepingadvice · 16/05/2026 19:32

I never said she was a talentless reality nobody. I never watched Made In Chelsea so im not sure of her background. But I do find it very uncomfortable that she's happy to put someone at risk. I personally went through infertility so I understand the desire for a child and had a difficult pregnancy (nothing on her scale but my DC needed NICU care). I wouldn't wish that on anyone which is why I find it strange that surrogacy is the route she is following. Obviously it's her choice but OP asked for opinions and thats mine 🤷🏻‍♀️

These people have had careers that many have dreamed of - i think there's something to be said about knowing when its time to take a step back and appreciate the life you have.

No - it was me saying she’s a talentless reality nobody and the fact she’s buying a baby brings her even further down in my estimation

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 16/05/2026 19:35

She has repented today so it’s okay.

Cosleepingadvice · 16/05/2026 19:35

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · 16/05/2026 19:34

No - it was me saying she’s a talentless reality nobody and the fact she’s buying a baby brings her even further down in my estimation

Ooooh, sorry - got you! Well yes, that could be one way of putting it!

Delatron · 17/05/2026 20:05

It’s not for her to comment though. Considering her child is behind in many other ways and she left her in-laws to potty train. She is in no position to make any comment on this.

She also plasters her child over social media consistently without his consent and practically pimps him out for freebies. Poor kid.

LittleGreenDragons · 17/05/2026 20:25

Lifesyoungdream · 16/05/2026 09:16

I don’t know who you are talking about. I thought they were in One Direction but I’m old and out of touch.😂

You and me both then I suddenly realised that it was Louise and not Louis 😂

Newsenmum · 17/05/2026 20:29

GoodkneeBadKnee · 16/05/2026 09:12

I've just Googled her. I agree with what she said, but she should've considered SEN in her comments.

She was laughing at children needing their bum wiped and being fed by teachers. Most kids that need that are sen, probably undiagnosed. Pretty nasty and sad.

throwawayimplantchat · 17/05/2026 20:34

Seems so incredibly hypocritical to be a campaigner for maternal health outcomes, claiming to be deeply troubled by the state of maternal healthcare, passionate about sharing the risks of pregnancy and childbirth that are often not discussed so come as a huge shock… and yet be happy to pay another woman (almost guaranteed to lack the financial / societal privilege she has) to take on the risk of pregnancy in order to have a second child. I can’t understand how the hypocrisy of those two positions isn’t glaringly obvious to her?

Newsenmum · 17/05/2026 20:40

throwawayimplantchat · 17/05/2026 20:34

Seems so incredibly hypocritical to be a campaigner for maternal health outcomes, claiming to be deeply troubled by the state of maternal healthcare, passionate about sharing the risks of pregnancy and childbirth that are often not discussed so come as a huge shock… and yet be happy to pay another woman (almost guaranteed to lack the financial / societal privilege she has) to take on the risk of pregnancy in order to have a second child. I can’t understand how the hypocrisy of those two positions isn’t glaringly obvious to her?

It’s also just extremely privileged

Okiedokie123 · 17/05/2026 20:41

Fedup360 · 16/05/2026 09:12

It’s everywhere at the moment so I don’t feel it needs context

It needs context.

DeathBanana · 17/05/2026 21:20

to be fair even google thinks she’s Louis Tomlinson from one direction.

Where’s the threads discussing Louise Thompson?
Peachesx2606 · 21/06/2026 23:52

Pricelessadvice · 16/05/2026 09:46

Here’s what I don’t understand. Teachers are reporting higher number of kids who aren’t toilet trained starting school.
People argue that it’s because there are SEN kids. But if you mention the rise of SEN kids, you get told there has always been that many, it’s just they were undiagnosed previously. Fair enough.
So, by that token, wouldn’t there have always been a large number of children who weren’t toilet trained by 4?
If there has always been that number of SEN kids about (just not diagnosed), wouldn’t toilet training have been a big issue back then, too?

Or do SEN parents back off the training when the kid finds it difficult, whereas years ago parents just had to persevere because they couldn’t turn around to the school and say “well he’s got SEN”

I’m not saying kids with SEN don’t exist, of course they do, but how did parents manage it years ago?

Many of those children would have been at SEN schools not in mainstream. Additionally in the past there was more support for SEN parents.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page