Feelings are high about this subject, and understandably so.
For the people saying that no one has the right to stop another person taking their life - that’s fine, but they need to do it themselves.
And harsh as that may sound, that’s to protect the most vulnerable in society. At the risk of sounding like an extra from Hot Fuzz, it’s about the greater good.
Canada introduced assisted dying in 2016 with strict safeguards. They have already been pushed aside as Track 2 was introduced which allowed people to end their life even without a terminal condition. In 2027 that will be extended further to include those suffering from mental illness.
And why this matters is coercion.
It’s not always easy to identify coercion. Sometimes it’s hidden entirely from view.
What has been seen in Canada is medical professionals not attempting to re-engage patients. Not connecting them to social care. A passive acceptance of someone expressing the will to die - even though there are treatments and services that may have been of use.
And then there’s societal pressure. People thinking they need to choose to die to avoid burdening their family. Or because they feel worthless to society. It even because there’s now such a thing as “duty to die”. It may sound ludicrous but it’s been happening in Canada since 2016. There are plenty of real life cases.
There are wider implications than simply “someone has the right to take their own life and it should be made as easy as possible”. That leads to much greater risk for vulnerable individuals and as we’ve seen already in Canada, gradual creep of what’s included.
This is just one link that gives examples of what’s happening in Canada - but there’s much more out there. blogs.bmj.com/spcare/2025/10/02/canadas-shortcut-to-death-how-assisted-dying-fails-our-most-vulnerable/