I think people who object to the existence of porn tend to latch on to the idea that porn is all coerced and trafficked underage drug addicts being exploited because that is a convenient front for their real objections to it, which are essentially that they just find it tacky and gross and feel threatened by it, and believe that ‘naice’ ladies are only turned by tasteful literary erotica and fine art featuring gentle and romantic mainstream sex acts.
I’ve given up trying to debate this on Mumsnet because a) Mumsnet users are not especially representative of women in general on the subject of porn (much as they’re not representative of women in general on the subject of transgender issues) and b) every single thread on the topic is full of wildly hyperbolic statements that bear no real relation to what porn actually encompasses.
If people are disgusted by porn, they don’t tend to watch it, for obvious reasons. That’s fine but it also means they don’t really know what it is that most porn consumers are actually watching (and no, the vast majority of porn consumers are not watching trafficked teenagers, violence, choking etc) and also how blindingly obvious it is when someone has very clearly not been coerced or exploited.
Of course it is repellent that anyone is coerced into making porn. Of course it is repellent that some men share private material without their partner’s consent. That is hideous and horrific. But it is no more representative of porn as a whole than an illegal bare knuckle fight to near-death in a grim basement is representative of the sport of boxing, or young lads from Albania forced to work for gangmasters on building sites are representative of the construction industry, or women trafficked in lorries from China and Vietnam and put to work in nail bars in modern slavery conditions are representative of the beauty business.
In short, it is perfectly possible to object strongly to some porn but not to object to the entire concept of porn. Most women I know think some porn is OK and some isn’t, and are sufficiently discerning to be able to distinguish between the two.
In my experience, women who don’t have a blanket objection to the entire concept of porn, and certainly women who actually watch porn, are much more knowledgeable, educated and discerning about it, much more aware of the issues involved, and much more realistic in their understanding of what a vast range of material that comes under the umbrella term of ‘porn’.
Ultimately, if you don’t want your husband wanking to Leanne from OnlyFans using a dildo, or a couple of swingers who make videos of themselves at group sex parties, that’s absolutely fine; you’re entitled to have that boundary and you’re entitled to find it gross. But it doesn’t mean Leanne and the swingers shouldn’t be allowed to do whatever the hell they want with their own bodies and that other adults shouldn’t have every legal right to watch.