I do have friends who have expressed similar to what many posters are saying on here - that they aren't homophobic but just couldn't date a guy who would also potentially be with men....
And I do believe they aren't homophobic in the sense that they are friends with me and have no problem with me being bi.....
But equally, nobody has ever fully explained the reason for this preference. And I would, I suppose, like to understand it.....
Someone upthread (sorry, I meant to quote it but now can't find it) suggested that they wouldn't feel comfortable if their partner had a whole area of attraction/preference that they couldn't fulfil....
I suppose I sort of understand that. But it also sounds a little dangerous to me.....
Human sexuality is fluctuating and multi-faceted. I think the aspiratuon to COMPLETELY fulfil your partner sexually, every single aspect of their preferences and desires, is an ambitious one, and likely to lead to failure and consequently distress ....
There are all kinds of, sometimes contradictory, sexual scenarios I find enticing. I don't think a single human could fulfil them all..... But nor do they need to? I would be absurd if I felt I couldn't survive unless every single aspect of my sexual desires was being regularly met....
(Our briefly, we all like lots of different things sexually. Whether that's blondes and brunettes, young guys and silver foxes, dominant and submissive, men and women..... We all have to accept that, if we want monogamy, we won't have all of these met, but that's ok. That's what masturbatory fantasy is for, if you really can't live without thinking about it.... )
My partner has enjoyed sex with men in the past before. He assures me he can live without it, and I find this just as plausible as a man who also likes curvy women but falls in love with a thin one, being perfectly able to cope..
. What's the difference, really?