Hmmm. From CNN:
"Border Patrol Commander-at-Large Gregory Bovino said Sunday that Second Amendment protections do not apply when federal officers believe they are being obstructed or assaulted, even as he offered no evidence that Alex Pretti engaged in such conduct before he was shot and killed in Minneapolis on Saturday.
In an interview with CNN’s Dana Bash, Bovino said constitutional gun rights are void in situations he characterized as riots or attacks on law enforcement. “We respect that Second Amendment right, but those rights don’t count when you riot and assault, delay, obstruct and impede law enforcement officers and, most especially, when you mean to do that beforehand,” he said.
Bovino also claimed to support peaceful armed protest, saying, “I’ve done that myself and fully support that, but not when you perpetrate violence, obstruct, delay or obfuscate border patrol in the performance of their duties.”
He did not cite evidence that Pretti committed violence or interfered with agents in those ways, instead repeatedly framing Pretti’s presence at the scene as proof of intent."
They are totally tying themselves in logic knots trying to justify this.
And what is escaping me at the moment, is there is no mention of the "violent illegal criminal" they are out to capture/ pick up. My logic says that if this assignment was so important, they would have named who they wanted, put out wanted posters etc. Because this person must be captured surely, for the safety of society ?
I am also baffled as to how ICE know who they want, and where they are. After all, ICE are not an investigative unit. That's the local law that do that. And DHS say local law are not working with ICE.
This whole thing has more logic holes/ lies/ misrepresentations than a fundie young earth creationist article on evidence for Noah's flood.