Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Are you aware of the amount of SEN/additional needs pupils in class?

303 replies

yetiflowerpumpkin · 11/01/2026 11:42

I’ve put this in chat rather than anywhere else because I just want to highlight the scale of SEN/additional needs in schools. In my experience, and reading on MN, some parents aren’t aware of the issues school staff face in supporting these students.

I am an experienced cover teacher in a medium sized primary school. In the classes I cover there are 25-30 children.

As an example, in two of the classes 75% of the pupils have additional educational needs. Some are diagnosed, others are on the (years long) waiting list. Some have multiple needs (Autism, ADHD, AuDHD, SEMH, dyslexia, dyspraxia, dyscalculia, physical/visual impairment and other medical needs, some life threatening). I don’t think in any class I cover there is less than 40%.

I think some parents think their child is the only child with needs in class and cannot understand why those needs are sometimes not met. In the ideal world all those needs would be met, but there isn’t a possibility in mainstream with lack of support staff, lack of space and lack of funding.

I try and do my best (my own family are neurodivergent) but I know my best isn’t good enough for some parents.

Does it surprise you the amount of additional needs there are in class?

OP posts:
JLou08 · 11/01/2026 14:11

Namenamchange · 11/01/2026 13:42

How do you know? Why do you know? They don’t wear a badge that marks them out!

The teacher told me when we were reviewing my DCs EHCP. Of course they don't all wear a badge, what a stupid comment to make to someone with a disabled child.

silverwrath · 11/01/2026 14:11

landlordhell · 11/01/2026 13:59

In key stage one, a child that can’t sit still, talking over teacher, not following any instructions etc could just be labelled ‘naughty’ but in some chn you realise that it’s a combination of ADHD and maybe lack of good parental role models. It’s rarely 100% one thing. I’m thinking of a a child who almost certainly has ADHD but also has a stressed out , very young single mum who doesn’t want to engage with the school. He goes to bed very late, watches screens all the time and his diet is poor. I often wonder how different his behaviours would be if his home life was better. In my experience there is more of this which only heightens any underlying condition . Of course the condition itself can make regulating his behaviour and bed time harder.

Edited

So many children now have SEN's.

Why isn't this being investigated as a matter of urgency?

We did not have this issue in the '70's. I lived it. I concede there may have been a few kids that had some minor SEN's in the school that were missed. But there was nowhere near the level we have today.

It needs investigating. The reasons for this massive increase. Something is very wrong. And schools need resources to accommodate this change that is happening to children neurodevelopmentally.

mixedpeel · 11/01/2026 14:14

@Theonlywayicanloveyou I’m extremely cross about the absolute destruction of childhood caused by Michael gove and other over the last two decades

Yes, this x 100. I think future historians will look back in horror to the current period and consider the state education system to be appallingly bad for all our children.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

cotswoldsgal1234 · 11/01/2026 14:14

Cornflakes44 · 11/01/2026 11:56

75% seems insanely high. Why do you think it’s so high and changed so much in a relatively short period of time? If you’re saying between 75-40% of any class will be kids with special needs we need to change mainstream education to cater
to that.

How are you going to do that? We just advertised for 4 TAs. We had one applicant, who was not even considered…..

SlayBelle · 11/01/2026 14:15

Not surprised to read this OP. My son’s class of 30 pupils is certainly about 35% - 40% SEN. I know because I am friendly with many of the parents and also the children talk about their SEN openly. My son will come home talking about ‘so and so has ADHD/diabetes/autism/dyslexia’ etc.

It’s difficult because without doubt SEN children need to feel safe and supported in school. But the lack of teaching resources means that a huge amount of time in the classroom is given over to managing the SENs and means that my NT son is assumed to be fine and is largely left to get on with things with minimal input beyond basic teaching.

It’s no one’s fault but it’s unfortunate and does mean my son is often bored at school and goes through periods where he doesn’t want to go in.

The answer is more SEN-dedicated settings and more teaching support. But I think hell will freeze over before the necessary money is spent on making it happen.

In the meantime, kids of all abilities are let down.

TigerRag · 11/01/2026 14:16

silverwrath · 11/01/2026 14:11

So many children now have SEN's.

Why isn't this being investigated as a matter of urgency?

We did not have this issue in the '70's. I lived it. I concede there may have been a few kids that had some minor SEN's in the school that were missed. But there was nowhere near the level we have today.

It needs investigating. The reasons for this massive increase. Something is very wrong. And schools need resources to accommodate this change that is happening to children neurodevelopmentally.

In the 70s, people like my cousin who was born premature wouldn't have survived. Amongst other things, he has lung disease and Autism

mixedpeel · 11/01/2026 14:18

VikaOlson · 11/01/2026 13:59

Some, one or two, would previously have been in special schools.
Some would not have been recognised as having SEN - they'd just have been considered slow or naughty.
Some would have managed fine with the curriculum of the past so wouldn't have had SEN.

Yep, this.

Thanks for all your posts on this thread btw.

millymollyminging · 11/01/2026 14:19

Frostyontheline · 11/01/2026 11:47

Also, i wonder what has changed, were there always that percentage in the class years ago, do you think? Just undiagnosed?

I was about to query this too. I was at school in the 60/70s, there was no ‘SEN’. I do recall in senior school 3 pupils who ( with today’s understanding) were almost certainly SEN. The rest? No.

I went to many schools (military) and that was the sum total of my experience.

so I am genuinely intrigued what on earth has happened in the (albeit quite large) intervening years?

hotpotlover · 11/01/2026 14:20

silverwrath · 11/01/2026 14:11

So many children now have SEN's.

Why isn't this being investigated as a matter of urgency?

We did not have this issue in the '70's. I lived it. I concede there may have been a few kids that had some minor SEN's in the school that were missed. But there was nowhere near the level we have today.

It needs investigating. The reasons for this massive increase. Something is very wrong. And schools need resources to accommodate this change that is happening to children neurodevelopmentally.

Maybe it also has something to do with the fact that teachers in the 70s were still allowed to beat send children into submission

silverwrath · 11/01/2026 14:21

TigerRag · 11/01/2026 14:16

In the 70s, people like my cousin who was born premature wouldn't have survived. Amongst other things, he has lung disease and Autism

Okay. So we've established one of the potential reasons. Prem babies.

Whosthetabbynow · 11/01/2026 14:22

hohahagogo · 11/01/2026 11:56

The bigger question is why are so many children “disabled” now. My dc are in their 20’s and there were only 1 or 2 in any class with Sen with the exception of specific learning disabilities like dyslexia which would be an additional 1 or 2. My DD’s both are neurodivergent and one is dyslexic, I knew senco well and she told me that most the issues were home life issues not sen. What has changed in the 12 years since I had that conversation? You can’t blame Covid because the numbers were rising before

When I was at school in the 60s/70s none of the kids were special needs. What on earth has happened?? I have my ideas but I’d probably be “cancelled”.

TigerRag · 11/01/2026 14:22

millymollyminging · 11/01/2026 14:19

I was about to query this too. I was at school in the 60/70s, there was no ‘SEN’. I do recall in senior school 3 pupils who ( with today’s understanding) were almost certainly SEN. The rest? No.

I went to many schools (military) and that was the sum total of my experience.

so I am genuinely intrigued what on earth has happened in the (albeit quite large) intervening years?

Just because you couldn't see their SEN doesn't mean it didn't exist

JLou08 · 11/01/2026 14:22

Whinge · 11/01/2026 13:21

I think your example is an extreme one. There are 3 in my DCs reception class that need extra support and that's the highest number they've had

Whereas I think your example is an unusual one. It's been a long time since I've experienced a class with a teacher and 2 TAs, it's pretty much unheard of these days. For the last 5 years there have been multiple children coming into our reception classes who need extra support and several each year who have medical / physical needs that require additional staffing / support. A year where only 3 children who require extra support would be unusal.

Edited

The second TA was added due to my child having an EHCP, the EHCP was is place before he started. Maybe the difference is area dependent, quality of early years education, number if ESL pupils, quality of facilities and staff training at the school.
Have you worked in a school for 5 years or has it just been the last 5 years that there has been an increase? That would tie in with covid times.

suburburban · 11/01/2026 14:23

BobblyBobbleHat · 11/01/2026 14:06

Although I think it is mostly down to better diagnosing etc, I strongly suspect that the negative impact of screens will become more and more clear. I think ongoing evidence will likely continue to show that sitting staring at a one-to-one screen like an iPad or phone is hugely detrimental to the development of speech and language skills and the ability to focus and control emotions etc.

I think there has to be some correlation plus socio economics may play a part

CodifyThis · 11/01/2026 14:24

cotswoldsgal1234 · 11/01/2026 14:14

How are you going to do that? We just advertised for 4 TAs. We had one applicant, who was not even considered…..

That's interesting. I thought that TA positions were quite competitive - I know it's low wage but working school hours and getting the holidays off suits a lot of mums in particular. Do you think it's more difficult to recruit than it used to be?

suburburban · 11/01/2026 14:24

TigerRag · 11/01/2026 14:22

Just because you couldn't see their SEN doesn't mean it didn't exist

Yes I’m sure thinking back there were dc with SNs in school with me

mixedpeel · 11/01/2026 14:28

silverwrath · 11/01/2026 14:21

Okay. So we've established one of the potential reasons. Prem babies.

Which was already mentioned at some point earlier in the thread. Then the poster called @VikaOlson has directly answered you and given several other factors.

suburburban · 11/01/2026 14:29

FcukBreastCancer · 11/01/2026 13:45

I noticed watching the kids in the lower years sing at Christmas that a very high number seemed to wear very strong glasses. In the years my kids are in it would be a handful. This was over half. It struck me at the time and I wondered if there is a cause

Screens probably make eyesight a lot worse?

Catwalking · 11/01/2026 14:30

As it’s only in more recent years that females have been ‘allowed’ to be affected by ADHD/ADD, I’m sort of surprised OP is surprised?

I had soooo many school reports complaining I was the class daydreamer & “ if only she would concentrate she would do well”. Nobody ever wondered if I could have been better helped,…another reason for stopping boarding school??

twinkletoesimnot · 11/01/2026 14:32

In my class of Y3/4 children I have 20 children.
4 EHCPs some of which contradict each other, 4 others already on the SEN register
2 that need to be added, and 2 others with mild needs - dyslexia and mild deafness which do not cause too much difficulty but do need consideration when planning, teaching etc.
I have to share a TA with the other KS2 class.
One of the children cannot go to the toilet independently as he gets scared of the lights, the dryer, the flush (autism).
One has PDA and trauma issues that cause me to evacuate the classroom when he gets overwhelmed and throws chairs.
This very much distresses the child who has autism.
I have 6 who cannot read and write independently.
I try hard to make my classroom inclusive.
SEN plans, paperwork, adapting lessons, creating resources, individual timetables, curriculum, brain breaks, movement breaks, busy boxes, sensory circuits, interventions. All of this takes hours!!!
This is not inclusion - No one is getting what they need or deserve. Not the SEN children, not the other children, definitely not me!

I can’t go on trips, have visitors in, can’t do courses if it would mean having an outside supply teacher.

I am exhausted!

Clefable · 11/01/2026 14:34

There were definitely some kids in my class at school 30-35 years ago who were ND and undiagnosed. But we didn’t have what DD1’s class has, which is kids who are violent in class, throwing chairs, trying to hit the teacher, having to be routinely removed from the class but always being returned so the cycle continues. We did have a couple of kids come in from what was referred to as ‘the special school’ for isolated lessons. These were generally autistic children who had a one to one at all times. I think quite a few of those children would nowadays be put into mainstream education, inappropriately IMO.

It’s depressing to listen to DD1 talk about what’s gone on in the classroom sometimes and the amount of teaching time that has to go in to dealing with it. Some of these children should not be in a mainstream classroom environment.

Nb14658 · 11/01/2026 14:35

Namenamchange · 11/01/2026 12:37

Yes there are lots of sen children in schools, however the curriculum is too fast, too hard, moves too quickly, which causes some children to become behind or overwhelmed.

The world is so more faster and there is so much information to process than 20 years ago, phones have decreased attention spans hugely, and are given to children to keep them quiet but in practice they struggle when not on them.

Parents are so much busier than 10 years ago, and have less time to support learning and reinforcement of information.

We confuse children with inconsistent behaviour expectations, and then become surprised when the behaviour doesn’t match the expectation.

Add in also the increasing information that ours brains do not all work the same, and the one size fits all doesn’t actually work anymore.

Also ad in that up until the 80’s lots of children with Sen weren’t even in school, they were in residential care.

Edited

This 100%

AxolotlEars · 11/01/2026 14:37

silverwrath · 11/01/2026 13:43

So, in the '70's there were all these SEN kids. Potentially 30% of the class. But we just didn't know it?

How interesting.

Yep!

If I look back on my school time I can name some of the kids that were also SEND but were naughty boys and stimming girls!

mixedpeel · 11/01/2026 14:39

Fearfulsaints · 11/01/2026 13:12

The curriculum has a lot to answer for. It also came in with austerity. So the support in school reduced. I watched schools go from a class TA all day, in every class and SEN TAs and visits from salt and OTs on a half termly basis, who would give advice, and trained play leaders in the playground, and a full time nuture room and a teacher who just did reading interventions a few hours a week, To just TAs in the morning in some classes and shared SEN TAs.

Yes, the combination of the Gove reforms and the austerity cuts were disastrous for education, imo. As well as reducing the support available in schools as you note, additional community provisions were cut to the bone or removed, such as SureStart for parents of pre-school children and youth clubs for teenagers. Plus the threshold for social services support were raised, so low-level input to help struggling parents, which may have headed off problems in previous decades, has not been available for the current generation.

cocoromo · 11/01/2026 14:40

Penelope23145 · 11/01/2026 12:01

The government seriously need to be addressing this if it's true. Not only so that the needs of these children can be met now but for future planning also. What happens in twenty years time if many of these kids can't work or are very limited in what type of work they can do, or are reliant on benefits? We already have a situation where there aren't enough working people to support the older population and all those needing support now. It's a complete disaster waiting to happen.
There needs to be some serious discussion and planning.

Edited

There is - all those working in SEN education are waiting with bated breath for the new (much delayed) white paper which is now due out early 2026. These are we’ll know issues and have been left to get worse. It’s now so bad that I doubt the new white paper will be a drop in the ocean to what is actually needed.