Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Tax TAx TAX!!!!!! Fuming at our government!

1000 replies

Baldylovingbeard · 26/11/2025 13:29

please try and convince me otherwise…..

What a joke this government are!!! ( UK)

Let’s just tax everyone who earns a bit of cash!!! Oh and while we’re at it… go on have loads more children it’s ok others will pay for them!!! Cutting the 2child benefit cap! If you decide to have multiple children you should be able to afford to provide for them. NOT expect others too!!!!! If you fall on hard times and you’ve worked and contributed to paying tax than you are within your rights to claim tax this is what benefits were made for, it’s not a means to not work, have more kids….etc!

Oh and if you work really hard and want to put some money by for you later days in life…. You’ll be taxed!

My situation:
Part time work, full time mum to 1 child. I work for myself and earn around 10k this money usually pays for things our daughter needs… clothes, clubs, any treats.
Husband works long hours, his under a lot of stress with his job, he has worked his way to and earns a very good salary 100k he gets taxed 60% you do the maths on that! We live in a 3 bed around £280k so nothing crazy but live within our means. We have one car! One holiday a year! Put money into savings! Pension! our daughter goes to one after school club. My husband got kicked out of home at 16…. He has worked with no help from family or friends and I believe he has worked very hard to get to where he is now. we are generous with charity’s and try our best to help out when we can if we can!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
ledmeup · 26/11/2025 14:44

888casino · 26/11/2025 14:43

Yes it did but I didn’t take the piss by having an entire platoon of kids, grown women who should know better doing this too. At least I had the excuse of being young

Edited

Most people would see 4 dc as a lot.., it’s not common

Coffeeandbooks88 · 26/11/2025 14:45

They have said nothing about lifting the benefit cap though.

888casino · 26/11/2025 14:46

CreativeGreen · 26/11/2025 14:44

Maybe they 'at least have the excuse' of being in an abusive relationship/a multiple birth/having been raped/losing a job after a child was born....? You can't just say it's fine for you to have an unplanned pregnancy but nobody else!

I can, I think a two child limit was reasonable I’m not saying it should be a zero child limit! I don’t have a squadron of tax payer funded children

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

SpaceRaccoon · 26/11/2025 14:46

HairsprayBabe · 26/11/2025 14:25

@SpaceRaccoon So a mother who had three children with a man who left her or died and is struggling to juggle single parenthood and working is feckless?

Ok cool - because that is exactly the type of person this change will benefit most. Working single parents.

Or did you just not bother to look at the details when the red mist of benefits rage descended.

I didn't say lavish at any point either, weird that you are making things up.

He should either be made to pay a fair amount of child support, or have had life insurance.
Why is the first instinct always a hand held out to the state (aka taxpayers) rather than any attempt at self-sufficiency?

AlwaysHopefull89 · 26/11/2025 14:46

HairsprayBabe · 26/11/2025 14:39

"BUT I work hard for my 100k a year..."

So? You think the single mum hospital porter on minimum wage with 3 kids on UC isn't hard working?

Because that is where the VAST majority of benefits go - after pensions of course. (which are a benefit like it or not babe)

To working single parents.

Get to fuck the greedy lot of you.

This

CreativeGreen · 26/11/2025 14:47

888casino · 26/11/2025 14:46

I can, I think a two child limit was reasonable I’m not saying it should be a zero child limit! I don’t have a squadron of tax payer funded children

Blimey so we've gone from 4 imagined children from 4 imagined different fathers to a platoon to a squadron! Stop making things up just to annoy yourself!

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 26/11/2025 14:47

ImWearingPantaloons · 26/11/2025 14:42

Strewth.

Please tell me you’re a troll or summat….

Nope. Just a holder of opinions that tend to go against the socially-approved narratives. I have many, but most never make it to the keyboard.

samarrange · 26/11/2025 14:47

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 13:55

@YorkshireGoldDrinker aren't Reform in agreement with lifting the 2 child cap?

Yep: https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/nigel-farage-calls-lifting-two-child-benefit-cap

Lalgarh · 26/11/2025 14:48

cupfinalchaos · 26/11/2025 13:57

This. Aspiration is punished under Labour so what hope is there for anyone. Where is the incentive to do well in this country?

Dubai is waiting for you. Feel free

888casino · 26/11/2025 14:48

CreativeGreen · 26/11/2025 14:47

Blimey so we've gone from 4 imagined children from 4 imagined different fathers to a platoon to a squadron! Stop making things up just to annoy yourself!

🤣🤣I don’t actually know the difference between a squadron and a platoon just thought the words sounded good. You can’t seriously think it’s reasonable to have 4+ taxpayer funded children though surely?

LeaveMeInTheLibrary · 26/11/2025 14:49

You chose to work part time, a luxury others don't have.

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 14:49

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 26/11/2025 14:47

Nope. Just a holder of opinions that tend to go against the socially-approved narratives. I have many, but most never make it to the keyboard.

This is a good thing! 😁

EasternStandard · 26/11/2025 14:49

Lalgarh · 26/11/2025 14:48

Dubai is waiting for you. Feel free

How does hammering growth help anyone?

CreativeGreen · 26/11/2025 14:50

888casino · 26/11/2025 14:48

🤣🤣I don’t actually know the difference between a squadron and a platoon just thought the words sounded good. You can’t seriously think it’s reasonable to have 4+ taxpayer funded children though surely?

'Taxpayer funded children' is not how I would think of it, and nor would I think anyone decides 'I'm going to get myself 4 taxpayer funded children'. I think babies born to women who need some financial support should not be penalized for being the third or fourth baby born to those women.

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 26/11/2025 14:50

NoSoapJustUseShowerGel · 26/11/2025 14:36

How do you think society should be paid for, if not through taxes?

Unfortunately there does need to be some amount of taxation as not everything can be truly private. Even with a tiny state, as long as the state exists, no matter the size, taxes will always exist.

You know the British civil service was around 4,000 people during the British Empire? Now there are in excess of a half a million staff. Insane size.

updownleftrightstart · 26/11/2025 14:52

LeaveMeInTheLibrary · 26/11/2025 14:49

You chose to work part time, a luxury others don't have.

Yet people working part time and claiming benefits on top have that luxury, and there is no cap on the benefits they can receive, and now they'll be able to claim for even more children as well.

My friend already gets more than my entire full time wage in benefits, on top of the salary she earns.

Lalgarh · 26/11/2025 14:52

EasternStandard · 26/11/2025 14:49

How does hammering growth help anyone?

Moot point.

Is it better to let someone on £150k/ year keep an extra £5k or split that in a redistribution of £2.5k to 2 people on £25k /year

CoastalCalm · 26/11/2025 14:53

So combined take home pay is approx £6.5k a month ? Hard to sympathise tbh

Nothankyov · 26/11/2025 14:53

Nickyknackered · 26/11/2025 13:32

That's a bit rich considering you work part time. How lucky you are that you married someone who can subsidise that choice you've made.

Not sure I agree with your definition of “a bit rich”. They have decided to do so and can afford it. They are not a drain to the tax system. if the OP’s husband is on 100k they don’t even get child benefit

EasternStandard · 26/11/2025 14:53

Lalgarh · 26/11/2025 14:52

Moot point.

Is it better to let someone on £150k/ year keep an extra £5k or split that in a redistribution of £2.5k to 2 people on £25k /year

‘Moot point’

Very Labour, who needs growth.

SatsumaDog · 26/11/2025 14:53

Whilst I didn’t vote for Labour and never have or will, the money has to come from somewhere. She also has to try and retain some votes and an easy fix is to make a change like removing the child benefit cap. In the same way they got themselves voted in by leveraging the VAT on school fees spite vote and the revenge vote against the Tories.

The books have to balance somehow and taxing from the ‘haves’ is the only way since
the ‘have nots’ don’t have any capacity to give more.

ManchesterGirl2 · 26/11/2025 14:54

The taxes on people earning a living are going up and up. It's disincentivising work. Why can't we tax more on capital gains, rather than income?

RedTagAlan · 26/11/2025 14:55

OriginalUsername2 · 26/11/2025 14:25

This.

Mad thread.

Yeah. I might head over to a " My DH had an affair and left me. What benefits am I entitled to?" thread.

At least they can do maths over there.

Carycach4 · 26/11/2025 14:55

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 13:35

Should your DH pay less tax because he came from nothing?

I think scrapping the 2 child policy is the right thing to do, it won’t lead to lots of new babies.

Yes, the frozen tax bands are frustrating and I had hoped they would be lifted. I think child benefit should be universal.

What makes you think it wont lead to lots of new babies-especially amongst the immigrant population and also the dole lifestyles population. You might not know them personally, but they do exist and in big numbers!

PeonyPatch · 26/11/2025 14:55

NewGoldFox · 26/11/2025 14:44

Fortunately now op’s husband can subsidise all the other mothers too.

That made me laugh

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.