How many UK born homeless people you got living in your house, then?
It's the most ludicrous of all arguments.
It is the law that asylum claimants are provided with accommodation whilst their claim is being processed.... Why on earth you'd want this not to be the case, I can't fathom.
The hotels are in use for a couple of reasons. Firstly, the ineptitude of the last government causing a backlog of such proportion that the numbers of people needing to be accommodated couldn't be done through council owned or HMO properties.
Private contracts were awarded some time ago to find accommodation for asylum claimants, with a few hotel chain owners offering their buildings at a premium.
Secondly, this is just one of the knock on effects of successive governments not building enough housing, particularly post Right to Buy.
Governments have done a lot to ensure that accommodation is available to homeless people. You'll find that the rough sleepers are often out because of rules governing the accommodation provided.
Maybe if asylum claimants weren't required to check in to their former hotel accommodation, some of them would be joining in rough sleeping and begging.
There are, of course, legitimate concerns around the (globally) growing number of refugees and asylum claimants, and of course, as I'm sure you'll know, the overwhelming majority settle in neighbouring countries.
Though is endless, nonsensical, misinformed rhetoric is not helpful to people's understanding of this complex situation, nor helpful in putting any reasonable measures in place.
Every time this is brought up, it's like playing a game of idiot bingo, and depressingly, continues to be no matter how many times the actual situation is laid out.