Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Sydney Sweeney

155 replies

Teenytwo · 31/07/2025 21:12

I keep seeing posts on my SM about Sydney and the controversy behind her advertisement for some jeans. I’ve seen multiple posts about it being controversial but I can’t understand why, she’s got a low cut top on but I wouldn’t consider it low enough to cause the attention it’s getting. Please can someone tell me what I have missed?

If it is something really obvious and I’m being an idiot I promise I’m not being goady, I genuinely can’t figure it out.

OP posts:
Perzival · 31/07/2025 21:47

Charabanc · 31/07/2025 21:44

AE have sold out in many stores in the US.

To be fair, that will be part of their marketing campaign.

Yep and it works.

I've priced some up today. Not because I think I'll look like SS but because I support an anti woke product.

doubleornothing · 31/07/2025 21:55

From what I have seen people are reacting the way they are because its hitting/hinting on the eugenics theme when theres a lot of racial / ICE crimes going on in America at the moment.

JackRobinson · 31/07/2025 22:09

Wow. I'm about 80% woke (probably lose a few points for being GC), and I don't find this advert offensive in the slightest. I'm brown-skinned, dark haired and dark eyes. I think I have pretty good genes, aesthetically speaking. Sydney Sweeney also has great genes, aesthetically speaking. Of course, there's more to a person's worth than what they look like, but most people would agree that she's very beautiful, and that's mostly down to her genes.
Don't see the issue at all 🤷🏽‍♀️

CruCru · 31/07/2025 22:25

I suspect that some of the scandal has been manufactured by American Eagle. Others have now run with it. So much publicity based on one campaign.

TheWickerHare · 31/07/2025 22:48

I was just surprised when I realised where I know her from, Handmaid's Tale.

Zov · 31/07/2025 22:51

Oasisagiger · 31/07/2025 21:27

Some people are making mountains out of molehills. Purposely forgetting that jeans and genes are the same words but have significantly different meanings. Utterly bonkers!

She was chosen for the advert because she’s pretty, young and ‘on-trend’. Some people get offended and read everything in to anything!

Would this have been an ‘issue’ had it been one of the Kardashian’s in the advert who have brown hair (naturally) and dark eyes? Or that Zendaya? Who was/is another trendy celeb. Of course not! Utter madness!

Edited

100% this. ^ Some people will scrabble in the mud for hours to try to find a reason to be offended. 🙄

Nothing to see here. 😎

Zov · 31/07/2025 22:55

TheWickerHare · 31/07/2025 22:48

I was just surprised when I realised where I know her from, Handmaid's Tale.

Yep, the young girl whose husband (that she was forced to marry) didn't love her, so she had an affair, and she and the man she was seeing were both executed by drowning. Very dark. Shock

Tiredofme · 31/07/2025 22:58

I'd never heard of her so googled to see what she looks like.
I don't find her beautiful at all actually . A very unattractive mouth and quite weird looking.
I've not seen the advert but I do object to being " told" someone one is beautiful . It truly is in the eye of the beholder.
I think the genes/ jeans really does come over as promoting racial superiority.

Mewling · 31/07/2025 23:04

Teenytwo · 31/07/2025 21:23

Just googled eugenics, not something I had heard of or was aware of before. I’m surprised a company would purposely do something so questionable when trying to advertise.

You’ve never heard of eugenics before?!

ExitPursuedByABare · 31/07/2025 23:05

Zov · 31/07/2025 22:55

Yep, the young girl whose husband (that she was forced to marry) didn't love her, so she had an affair, and she and the man she was seeing were both executed by drowning. Very dark. Shock

Oh I’d never have recognised her.

Zov · 31/07/2025 23:05

Tiredofme · 31/07/2025 22:58

I'd never heard of her so googled to see what she looks like.
I don't find her beautiful at all actually . A very unattractive mouth and quite weird looking.
I've not seen the advert but I do object to being " told" someone one is beautiful . It truly is in the eye of the beholder.
I think the genes/ jeans really does come over as promoting racial superiority.

Wow, what a rude thing to say about her.

And the irony of your post!

Zov · 31/07/2025 23:06

Mewling · 31/07/2025 23:04

You’ve never heard of eugenics before?!

Yeah we've all heard of eugenics. But that's not what's going on here.

Tiredofme · 31/07/2025 23:24

Zov · 31/07/2025 23:05

Wow, what a rude thing to say about her.

And the irony of your post!

Well actually I wouldn't normally comment on someone's looks.

But so many posters on this thread are talking about how " beautiful" she is.
I thought that her being " beautiful" was somehow central to the whole thing. How she actually looks. Whether she is blonde haired/blue eyed or some other combination of supposed beauty.

So it's apparently OK for other posters to comment on how they perceive her to look because they buy into her as an example of beauty but it's not ok for me to comment on her looks because I don't buy into it?
I think there is a word for not allowing someone to have a different opinion.

Mewling · 31/07/2025 23:37

Zov · 31/07/2025 23:06

Yeah we've all heard of eugenics. But that's not what's going on here.

The OP very clearly says she’s never heard of it.

Blinky21 · 31/07/2025 23:48

Whatever the intention is, it's a really poorly judged ad given current social context in the USA

EconomyClassRockstar · 31/07/2025 23:53

Blinky21 · 31/07/2025 23:48

Whatever the intention is, it's a really poorly judged ad given current social context in the USA

Well, the jeans are sold out so apparently not!

2dogsandabudgie · 31/07/2025 23:57

It's just a play on words. Can't see what all the fuss is about

CruCru · 01/08/2025 09:21

I can see the appeal of these adverts. A healthy looking pretty girl who hasn’t had any work done and isn’t wearing so much make up that you can’t tell what she looks like. It makes a change from the lip filler / Khardashian stuff that was around a while ago.

McSpoot · 01/08/2025 09:25

Zov · 31/07/2025 23:06

Yeah we've all heard of eugenics. But that's not what's going on here.

The person being quoted (and questioned) said that they had never heard of eugenics. Hence, the question.

Teenytwo · 01/08/2025 09:27

No I hadn’t heard of eugenics, not something that was covered in school and it’s not the type of thing that I would research/read about in my spare time generally.

OP posts:
peanutbuttertoasty · 01/08/2025 09:29

OverlyFragrant · 31/07/2025 21:46

They're butt hurt that a conventionally attractive young white woman is in an advert.

In a nutshell. Without demonstrating the required amount of self-loathing necessary for white people these days.

The only racists I can identify in this situation are those shouting eugenics.

Portakalkedi · 01/08/2025 09:44

Don't these people have any actual issues to get worked up about? War, famine etc? FFS.

PurpleChrayn · 01/08/2025 09:44

People are saying it’s Nazi. Which is ironic because there are people espousing ACTUAL Nazi ideologies that nobody seems too pressed about, such as telling Jews we need to wear yellow stars again and resurrecting old blood libels.

FrippEnos · 01/08/2025 09:47

For some reason she seems to be a celeb that it is ok to hate on.

Notmycircusnotmyotter · 01/08/2025 10:46

I think it's absolutely barmy. I don't use the term woke but if anything is woke nonsense, it's this. Total storm in a teacup.

Her genes do make her beautiful. Many women of other ethnicities also have incredible genes that make them equally or more beautiful. Saying someone has good genes does not imply you wish to end other blood lines FFS.

Swipe left for the next trending thread