Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

1,000 new PIP claims per day?

1000 replies

flashbac · 30/06/2025 10:21

Is this true? (From someone who is naturally cynical of government info.)

If it is, is there something else behind the statistic? Is it because people have to reapply or something like that?

This is from the government website:

"Monthly PIP awards have more than doubled since the pandemic, rising from 13,000 to 34,000 - a rate of around 1,000 new claims per day, or the population of Leicester every year."

I find the statistic unbelievable.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Fsfaava · 30/06/2025 14:46

MyQuirkyTraybake · 30/06/2025 14:40

But costs would rise. Then we'd be back to square one. I'd like to see British farmers paid to grow healthy food for our own people. Good diet improves quality of life and it will reduce our import emissions and it will give jobs to people. No more sitting on your ass getting JSA, you get in the field and pick food. You're welcome to go home and apply for jobs in the evening like all of us working full time.

I do feel that for physically healthy people a government jobs guarantee would be good. Not welfare but working

FloofyBird · 30/06/2025 14:47

NHS support is slow to non existent for many issues.

covid happened and long terms effects for some people

mh support is dire/non existent

send support in schools is dire.

all will have a knock on effect and pip will probably increase even more in years to come.

There's no point cutting pip if we don't fix the issues around why so many now need to claim it.

ARichtGoodDram · 30/06/2025 14:47

Hes never had an assesment

You can't be an appointee for another adult without an assessment.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Themagicfarawaytreeismyfav · 30/06/2025 14:48

LadyKenya · 30/06/2025 14:45

They would have taken information from what you put on the form. Did you have a telephone assessment as well, or face to face assessment?

i had a telephone appointment, my point is that i have never been asked to prove anything! I could be lying through my teeth ( im not) for all they know.

Badbadbunny · 30/06/2025 14:49

MaturingCheeseball · 30/06/2025 14:21

I agree with poster on first page. Universal basic income. The jobs market is shrinking and a lot of people don’t want to work anyway.

Of course there are problems: it would be even harder to find people to do unpopular, poorly-paid jobs (eg care work). I can’t immediately think of an answer to this.

But yes, it would do away with increasingly suspect claims - and if you wanted more money you could always get a job on top!

Trouble is that tax rates would rise enormously to fund the UBI, so people wouldn't be incentivised to work, especially in hard/unpopular jobs, as they'd probably lose over half their wages to tax!

FloofyBird · 30/06/2025 14:49

Themagicfarawaytreeismyfav · 30/06/2025 14:24

I completely agree! My DC has been awarded PIP and i sent no evidence just the contact details of his GP and hospital consultant ( who haven’t been contacted…i asked). He was awarded the highest rate for 6 years!

What for though? There's quite a big difference between claiming for something like asd vs cancer or cerebral palsy etc

Badbadbunny · 30/06/2025 14:52

Fsfaava · 30/06/2025 14:46

I do feel that for physically healthy people a government jobs guarantee would be good. Not welfare but working

There could be some kind of "incentive" for employers to hire people who were on PIP etc. Say something like 50% PIP to the employer and 50% PIP to the employee for say 6-12 months, with a guarantee of the employee going back onto full PIP if the job doesn't work out. Make it easy and risk free for the PIP claimant to "try out" a job, and pay the employer something towards the additional costs of training, special equipment, supervision etc for a limited time to reduce their risk too!

XenoBitch · 30/06/2025 14:54

Badbadbunny · 30/06/2025 14:52

There could be some kind of "incentive" for employers to hire people who were on PIP etc. Say something like 50% PIP to the employer and 50% PIP to the employee for say 6-12 months, with a guarantee of the employee going back onto full PIP if the job doesn't work out. Make it easy and risk free for the PIP claimant to "try out" a job, and pay the employer something towards the additional costs of training, special equipment, supervision etc for a limited time to reduce their risk too!

Say you know nothing about PIP without saying you know nothing about PIP.

Badbadbunny · 30/06/2025 14:57

XenoBitch · 30/06/2025 14:54

Say you know nothing about PIP without saying you know nothing about PIP.

The worker would be getting a wage too, so they'd be earning more than the PIP they'd be losing to help cover the additional costs they'd incur such as taxis if necessary.

It's just a suggestion. We need carrot rather than stick if we want people back to work, both for employers and the benefit claimant.

ARichtGoodDram · 30/06/2025 14:57

There could be some kind of "incentive" for employers to hire people who were on PIP etc. Say something like 50% PIP to the employer and 50% PIP to the employee for say 6-12 months, with a guarantee of the employee going back onto full PIP if the job doesn't work out. Make it easy and risk free for the PIP claimant to "try out" a job, and pay the employer something towards the additional costs of training, special equipment, supervision etc for a limited time to reduce their risk too!

@Badbadbunny PIP isn't an out of work benefit

You can claim pip alongside other benefits, if you're earning 10k a year or if you're earning £1billion a year.

XenoBitch · 30/06/2025 14:59

Badbadbunny · 30/06/2025 14:57

The worker would be getting a wage too, so they'd be earning more than the PIP they'd be losing to help cover the additional costs they'd incur such as taxis if necessary.

It's just a suggestion. We need carrot rather than stick if we want people back to work, both for employers and the benefit claimant.

PIP is not an out of work benefit. People on PIP who are not working will, in most cases, still be on PIP if they get a job.

ARichtGoodDram · 30/06/2025 14:59

It's just a suggestion. We need carrot rather than stick if we want people back to work, both for employers and the benefit claimant.

Which may be relevant if you were talking about an out-of-work/income replacement benefit. Not PiP.

x2boys · 30/06/2025 15:00

Themagicfarawaytreeismyfav · 30/06/2025 14:44

Hes never had an assesment

So why are you applying fir your son if he's getting PIP then he can apply for himself.

Badbadbunny · 30/06/2025 15:00

XenoBitch · 30/06/2025 14:59

PIP is not an out of work benefit. People on PIP who are not working will, in most cases, still be on PIP if they get a job.

As many people above have mentioned, the vast majority of PIP claimants ARE out of work. Just because you don't need to be doesn't mean that no one is. Obviously some kind of "back to work" incentive wouldn't affect the MINORITY of PIP claimants who are already in work!

The existing PIP scheme does nothing to help/incentivise a prospective employer to take on a disabled person.

XenoBitch · 30/06/2025 15:04

Badbadbunny · 30/06/2025 15:00

As many people above have mentioned, the vast majority of PIP claimants ARE out of work. Just because you don't need to be doesn't mean that no one is. Obviously some kind of "back to work" incentive wouldn't affect the MINORITY of PIP claimants who are already in work!

The existing PIP scheme does nothing to help/incentivise a prospective employer to take on a disabled person.

Edited

It would not affect their PIP anyway, as PIP IS NOT AN OUT OF WORK BENEFIT. If they got jobs, they would still be on PIP. Because they are still disabled and entitled to PIP when at home etc.
There are separate schemes such has Access to Work, which is help with adaptions at work.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 30/06/2025 15:04

Badbadbunny · 30/06/2025 14:52

There could be some kind of "incentive" for employers to hire people who were on PIP etc. Say something like 50% PIP to the employer and 50% PIP to the employee for say 6-12 months, with a guarantee of the employee going back onto full PIP if the job doesn't work out. Make it easy and risk free for the PIP claimant to "try out" a job, and pay the employer something towards the additional costs of training, special equipment, supervision etc for a limited time to reduce their risk too!

Why the hell would my former employer (now retired) need an incentive from my PIP to employ me? For the umpeenth time, PIP IS NOT AN OUT OF WORK BENEFIT.

The additional costs of employing someone who needs reasonable adjustments comes from Access to Work anyway.

XenoBitch · 30/06/2025 15:05

The existing PIP scheme does nothing to help/incentivise a prospective employer to take on a disabled person

That is because PIP is nothing to do with work.

GarlicMile · 30/06/2025 15:07

insomniastressandregret · 30/06/2025 12:08

since the pandemic

Thats the reason right there . Covid has made a LOT of people extremely unwell. We will be fed the line that people just liked their time off / are less resilient now but it’s gaslighting. Covid has damaged us.

Thank you! Was hoping someone else had picked up on this.

By autumn 2020, public health professionals were forecasting long-term economic repercussions of the pandemic. It was already clear that Covid can cause system-wide damage affecting multiple organs, as well as the extended post-viral syndrome we're calling Long Covid.

Plus, of course, there were mental health impacts from widespread trauma, lockdown effects, unemployment and derailed life plans.

The general reluctance to face this - government included - is strange.

K0OLA1D · 30/06/2025 15:09

Badbadbunny · 30/06/2025 14:52

There could be some kind of "incentive" for employers to hire people who were on PIP etc. Say something like 50% PIP to the employer and 50% PIP to the employee for say 6-12 months, with a guarantee of the employee going back onto full PIP if the job doesn't work out. Make it easy and risk free for the PIP claimant to "try out" a job, and pay the employer something towards the additional costs of training, special equipment, supervision etc for a limited time to reduce their risk too!

Jesus fucking christ.

Themagicfarawaytreeismyfav · 30/06/2025 15:10

FloofyBird · 30/06/2025 14:49

What for though? There's quite a big difference between claiming for something like asd vs cancer or cerebral palsy etc

ASD, ADHD, OCD, ODD, Asthma and partial deafness

K0OLA1D · 30/06/2025 15:10

Badbadbunny · 30/06/2025 14:57

The worker would be getting a wage too, so they'd be earning more than the PIP they'd be losing to help cover the additional costs they'd incur such as taxis if necessary.

It's just a suggestion. We need carrot rather than stick if we want people back to work, both for employers and the benefit claimant.

Just stop. Deary me.

thatsawhopperthatlemon · 30/06/2025 15:12

Fsfaava · 30/06/2025 10:35

Can I ask you something. What would an autistic student for example claim for? What would they need extra help with?

Every autistic person is completely different so your question is impossible to answer I'm afraid.

Irotoyu · 30/06/2025 15:13

I have a friend who has been awarded it for 4 years and is completely functioning just has bpd. Literally no reason for him to have it. He admits this.

Why are we paying parents with mildly autistic kids. More support would be better. Is this not an actual incentive for people to get diagnoses like this.

Sick of reading about it while I work away just to survive. When I'm driving for work I see loads of people just wandering about buying shit in working hours. Many of them look like theyre on the dole.

The whole system is completely uncontrolled and fucked up.

MyLov · 30/06/2025 15:15

Lavatime · 30/06/2025 10:33

this is probably not going to go down well as an opinion but I really do think a lot of this has to do with social media and the rise in people with fairly mild adhd or autism getting diagnosed and then applying for pip- I have seen a lot of Tik Toks showing how to answer the questions to apply for pip for autism and adhd etc
there's definitely a trend of being labelled neurodivergent and basically demanding resources and help that people don't really need imo

disclaimer I am autistic myself but if I'm honest I don't fully believe everyone getting g diagnosed privately with these things actually has them, i don't claim pip but my asd does effect my day to day life a lot, but I duvet see his money would help really though I do get help from adult autism team through cmht

You wouldn’t be able to claim PIP if your condition only affects you mildly. PIP criteria is not based on diagnosis, it’s based on how your condition affects you and the bar is fairly high.

JustASmallBear · 30/06/2025 15:15

ARichtGoodDram · 30/06/2025 13:57

I also had the thought that perhaps PIP could in part be more like DSA which is allocated to the student, but the student doesn't get cash, they just have agreed things allocated to them from the allowance

That only works if people use their PIP for set things from every payment.

So that could work for DD4's physio as that's a set cost every month (although not completely as it's term time one place and another outwith term time).

It doesn't work for the movable costs - some months £30/40 is spent on parking. Other months it pretty much all goes on parking if she's having a surgery or a stint in hospital. After a surgery she'll sometimes have extra therapies in a hydro pool or the likes.

If one of her aids breaks we often have to pay to replace it - what happens if the vouchers given that month are for physio and parking, but we need a wheelchair repair or splits replaced?

If her usual respite place is unavailable and we need a different one the cost is different.

Dd4 is a child so gets DLa atm instead of PIP but the principle is the same - it's a contribution toward the extra costs of her disabilities.

That was the kind of thing I was thinking of, the physio.

More to help lessen the mental load of constantly having to think about absolutely everything all the time, and working it all out.

I imagine that some people having gone through the process of claiming and all the stress that entails would appreciate part of the claim being presented to them as set things rather than having to think about everything themselves.

Particularly people with poor executive functioning.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.