Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Taxes to rise to fund PIP

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 11:20

I just read this, Don't agree with this at all. PIP needs to be reformed. But not by introducing this two tier system. Sick of Labour already. Might have know they would revert to type. With all the infighting and disagreement so nothing ever gets done except back peddling, increased taxes and prices rises.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Tiredofwhataboutery · 27/06/2025 12:47

HowardTJMoon · 27/06/2025 12:43

So they're deliberately diverting wages into pension contributions so they can maximise how much they can suckle from the public teat? Wow. You know a lot of shitty people.

Hang on - doesn't that make them benefits cheats?

It’s not really cheating though, perfectly allowable within the rules. It’s a bit like tax avoidance, slightly morally dubious but not an issue really.

teksquad · 27/06/2025 12:48

They need to weed out all the lazy non disabled adults who have decided not to work AND claim benefits. That money should go to the people with actual physical disabilities as described above. Not to healthy adults that find work a bit stressful. That's what I thought welfare reform would be. Not taking winter fuel payments off penisoners with no savings and stopping physically diable people from getting the help they need, and deserve.

Mischance · 27/06/2025 12:49

I wish they would rise taxes and spend them on the right things: the welfare state and support for young families - bring back Sure Start etc. That's what governments are for. Scandinavian countries have high taxes and good services. Their populations do not flee for lower taxes because they have a sense of loyalty and community responsibility. It is part of their ethos. Sadly, since Thatcher, it is not part of ours - "there is no such thing as community" she told us so it is every man for himself. What a mess.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

PetiteBlondeDuBoulevardBrune · 27/06/2025 12:50

MidnightPatrol · 27/06/2025 12:20

Worth noting that the average worker in the UK currently has the lowest personal tax rate since 1975…

… while the overall tax burden is at a record high (due to increased taxes on higher earners).

Indeed.
And all the people commenting that they pay tax: unless you are a 40%+ taxpayer, you are costing the state more than what you pay in, so what’s your point?

SwearyYellowStartish · 27/06/2025 12:51

I worked administering PIP and making decisions for several years. Nobody ever believes me but it always felt to us like the higher ups and the government wanted us to pay and find ways to squeeze people into awards.

During the coalition/Tory years the focus was on reducing the UC bill. They were more than happy to have people on PIP. It has spiralled massively.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 27/06/2025 12:51

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 11:46

The country needs investment though, and public services need more money to cope with the changing demographics so tax rises are inevitable.

The problem is that we are beyond the point when tax rises raise more money; they are now such a distincentive that they are reducing the tax take. If only this government had come into office with a coherent plan - it’s crazy to think that, almost 12 months in, they are still making it up on the fly!

AgnesX · 27/06/2025 12:51

I'll need to read the ins and outs of it but this sounds like a shitty thing to do as people will resent it and by definition resent the less abled.

Meanwhile the Tories will be loving it. What a shit show 🙄

EasternStandard · 27/06/2025 12:52

HowardTJMoon · 27/06/2025 12:43

So they're deliberately diverting wages into pension contributions so they can maximise how much they can suckle from the public teat? Wow. You know a lot of shitty people.

Hang on - doesn't that make them benefits cheats?

This doesn’t make sense. Policy impacts behaviour.

Genevieva · 27/06/2025 12:52

They never seem to think about the negative impact tax has, not just in individuals, but on the economy. All the missed opportunities for business owners or prospective business owners to take risks on investing in a venture that might turn an profit and employ more people. All those jobs they aren’t available because there’s no money left after paying the tax bill. All the foreign investment that goes elsewhere. It’s mind boggling.

SquashMeDown · 27/06/2025 12:52

PreetyinPurple · 27/06/2025 12:39

Why don’t they sort out companies who don’t pay people properly and need to be topped up by UC first. Or help create some jobs, the dial back on remote working is a disaster for disabled people.
They can talk about offering support for disabled people to work, I want to see it first. Many companies think that slapping a flag on something is ‘access’. Look at train companies painting their trains with pride flags and then not offering ramps for wheelchair users.

If you want disabled people to work, including those with mental problems. You need to change the system first.

Pride and trans inclusion are such a lazy but effective way to be progressive and inclusive.

In truth there is a hell of a long way to go to be inclusive to disabled people, but few businesses really care because it’ll take real effort, not like the “just add a rainbow to our logo” mentality that goes on now.

We need real change, and in the lack of that more and more people are still going to need PIP as their needs are being increasingly unmet.

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 12:53

We pay taxes so if we need benefits in the future they are there. What if you wake up tomorrow disabled or get in a life changing accident. Don't ever think your immune from disability

That's that point!

The reforms are happening to new claimants but not current ones.

People are paying for things that they won't get...

KateMiskin · 27/06/2025 12:53

samarrange · 27/06/2025 12:46

Apologies for the slight derail, but: I always laugh when people threaten to move abroad, whether it's "If Labour get in" or "If the Tories get in". Ditto in the US, "If Trump/Harris wins I'm moving to Canada".

Very few of these people ever move. And a lot of them come home after a short time with their tails between their legs.

Moving to another country is hard. You lose all your daily social life. Absolutely everything works differently — something as simply as "going to the doctor and getting a prescription and going to the pharmacy" is different in France and different again in the Netherlands. If you move to a non-English speaking country you have to deal with the language barrier, and wherever you go, it turns out that most adults are not in the market for new friends (and those who are, are not always the kinds of people who you would want to be friends with). And abroad also has income tax and traffic jams and bad bosses and government bureaucracy.

People make fun of working-class Brits who have saved a bit of money and up sticks at 58 and move to Spain, but I think they are immensely brave. And yes, many of them don't learn much Spanish, but then learning the two forms of the imperfect subjunctive probably isn't on any early retiree's to-do list.

Maybe if you are a billionaire and don't have any "normal" friends then it's less hard. Going to soirées at the George V in Paris isn't all that much different to going to soirées at the Dorchester. But for normal people with friends and family it's a huge decision.

I work with highly skilled, highly globally mobile people. Trust me, they are leaving
Not everyone is fazed by learning a new language when they already speak 3 from birth.

PandoraSocks · 27/06/2025 12:54

teksquad · 27/06/2025 12:48

They need to weed out all the lazy non disabled adults who have decided not to work AND claim benefits. That money should go to the people with actual physical disabilities as described above. Not to healthy adults that find work a bit stressful. That's what I thought welfare reform would be. Not taking winter fuel payments off penisoners with no savings and stopping physically diable people from getting the help they need, and deserve.

You need to a) get a firmer grasp of what PIP actually is (hint: nothing to do with being unemployed); and b) read the Impact Assessment on the PIP changes.

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 12:57

Apologies for the slight derail, but: I always laugh when people threaten to move abroad, whether it's "If Labour get in" or "If the Tories get in". Ditto in the US, "If Trump/Harris wins I'm moving to Canada".

Perhaps you live somewhere that's not very diverse? My parents are immigrants as were the parents of all my school friends growing up in London. Moving country isn't a such a big deal for many of us, my younger siblings have lived abroad in other countries, one is now looking at a permanent move. I will certainly be encouraging my dc if it's something they want.

EasternStandard · 27/06/2025 12:57

KateMiskin · 27/06/2025 12:53

I work with highly skilled, highly globally mobile people. Trust me, they are leaving
Not everyone is fazed by learning a new language when they already speak 3 from birth.

No it’s not that hard, especially if you are younger and have a career that’s in demand elsewhere

alexalisten · 27/06/2025 12:57

hooverbob · 27/06/2025 12:53

We pay taxes so if we need benefits in the future they are there. What if you wake up tomorrow disabled or get in a life changing accident. Don't ever think your immune from disability

That's that point!

The reforms are happening to new claimants but not current ones.

People are paying for things that they won't get...

Yeah i dont agree with that. But iv paid tax for 20 years and only started claiming pip about 3 years ago. I actually still pay tax as im working. Pip is an incredibly hard benefit to get. And the fraud rate is basically zero. The problem is there are people who have never been through the pip process so dont understand the reality. They think you can walk into a gp say your stressed and get pip. A lot of people seem to have a strong opinion without even reading the descriptors.

EasternStandard · 27/06/2025 12:58

Genevieva · 27/06/2025 12:52

They never seem to think about the negative impact tax has, not just in individuals, but on the economy. All the missed opportunities for business owners or prospective business owners to take risks on investing in a venture that might turn an profit and employ more people. All those jobs they aren’t available because there’s no money left after paying the tax bill. All the foreign investment that goes elsewhere. It’s mind boggling.

It really is. And people asking for more of the same.

ShesTheAlbatross · 27/06/2025 12:58

HowardTJMoon · 27/06/2025 12:43

So they're deliberately diverting wages into pension contributions so they can maximise how much they can suckle from the public teat? Wow. You know a lot of shitty people.

Hang on - doesn't that make them benefits cheats?

I’m not a parent who does this in order to access free childcare (I don’t earn enough), but the parents who do are making use of a specific rule that is in place because the government wants to incentivise this. The gov wants people to pay into their pensions, and so the rules encourage this. They aren’t cheating anything. Just like pension contributions being tax free so that people are more likely to actually make them - are you cheating the tax system when you contribute to your pension, after all, you’re reducing your taxable income.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 27/06/2025 12:59

MidnightPatrol · 27/06/2025 12:20

Worth noting that the average worker in the UK currently has the lowest personal tax rate since 1975…

… while the overall tax burden is at a record high (due to increased taxes on higher earners).

I don’t think that’s true, if you look at the total tax take for the average worker. VAT is higher, and on more things (albeit there was a short term rise in VAT in ‘75 when the then Labour government ran out of money…)

We now have VAT on utilities, we pay insurance premium tax, fuel and alcohol duty is much higher and NI is also a lot higher. And that’s before council tax, which for an average earner in an average area (£35k salary, £2k of post tax income council tax bill) is equivalent to another 9% of gross income income.

Meadowfinch · 27/06/2025 13:00

Badbadbunny · 27/06/2025 12:18

It won't be "everyone" though, will it? Those living on benefits will be exempt, as will pensioners. So it WILL just be yet another tax on workers.

Those on benefits will be exempt but pensioners will not.

They pay taxes the same as we do. Anyone with even the smallest private or occupational pension...if it pushes them over the single person's allowance, they pay income tax.

Rosscameasdoody · 27/06/2025 13:00

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 11:20

I just read this, Don't agree with this at all. PIP needs to be reformed. But not by introducing this two tier system. Sick of Labour already. Might have know they would revert to type. With all the infighting and disagreement so nothing ever gets done except back peddling, increased taxes and prices rises.

Where have you read that tax rises will pay for PIP ? Because to my knowledge the full details of how it will be funded won’t be known until the Autumn statement. Government has long had two tier systems. At the time PIP was introduced DLA was still in payment for those past the cut off date for migration onto PIP and not subject to the same harsher assessment as PIP. Once all those claims are closed, for whatever reason, it will be the same for all claimants. It’s just a temporary transition period.

The original plans needed to be stopped because they were grossly unfair, and there’s no guarantee that they will pass at next weeks’ vote because some MP’s are still unhappy at the four point rule being introduced for any claimant.

Ask yourself a question. If it’s the governments’ intention to get more disabled people into work, why are they cutting PIP when it has absolutely nothing to do with the ability to work ? IMO it’s for no other reason than to make it harder for disabled people to make ends meet if they no longer qualify for PIP, so it forces them back to work even if they are not fit. And it will also impact those who use PIP to support them to be able to work in the first place. It’s a huge own goal.

Instead of being sick of Labour for the reasons you’ve stated, try being sick of them for assuming that once you cut someone’s support, the need for that support disappears. Because it doesn’t. When a PIP claim is cut, any carers allowance paid to friends or family actually providing care for that person is also cut. And for that reason the government won’t save a penny with these reforms - because the support disabled people and their carers could access through PIP and carers allowance will simply switch to social care, which costs significantly more and is already stretched to unacceptable limits and the tax payer will foot an even bigger bill.

DrPrunesqualer · 27/06/2025 13:01

It’s nonsense to water down the proposals to only include future claimants.
Are those future claimants not in need as much as the existing.

We simply can’t be treating people differently like this.
The policy should be for everyone, equally, across the board

caringcarer · 27/06/2025 13:01

If RR had not decided to raise taxes on Non Dom's over 10k high tax payers would not have left UK since RR changed the rules with many more exiting every month. We need these high tax payers to help pay the benefits bill but stupid R from accounts drove them out. NF idea is much better. High tax paying ND's to pay £250k each and money to be used to give low paid but working people a bonus each year. We need to attract those high tax payers back.

caringcarer · 27/06/2025 13:02

DrPrunesqualer · 27/06/2025 13:01

It’s nonsense to water down the proposals to only include future claimants.
Are those future claimants not in need as much as the existing.

We simply can’t be treating people differently like this.
The policy should be for everyone, equally, across the board

That is 2 tier Kier for you.

luckylavender · 27/06/2025 13:02

Viviennemary · 27/06/2025 11:20

I just read this, Don't agree with this at all. PIP needs to be reformed. But not by introducing this two tier system. Sick of Labour already. Might have know they would revert to type. With all the infighting and disagreement so nothing ever gets done except back peddling, increased taxes and prices rises.

No one knows, it’s just media stories

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread