Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

How do you honestly feel about a baby having two mums?

852 replies

Corneliusthecamel · 16/05/2025 14:26

Hi,

Recently, a close friendship has come to an end and it’s been difficult to process. Long story short - I am a woman married to another woman and I gave birth to a baby last year who was conceived via sperm donor/fertility treatment through the NHS. We are all really happy and she is beautiful.

A good, long term friend of mine has become increasingly distant over the past couple of years. I confronted her about this recently and she admitted that she struggles with my life choices and doesn’t feel it’s right that I have chosen to bring a baby up with another woman. She feels very strongly that a baby should have a traditional mum and dad unit where possible and feels that I am wrong for choosing this path.

Anyway, the friendship is over, and I think that’s the right thing for both of us - it’s not really possible to carry on when we both have such different views and experiences of the world.

But it has made me want to ask - what are your honest opinions of two women choosing to pursue fertility treatment and having a baby? Obviously it’s my life and I’m happy so in one way, who cares. But I truly didn’t think my friend held those types of views and often, people won’t speak their true thoughts in real life, so I am curious what people truly think about it

OP posts:
Thisshirtisonfire · 16/05/2025 22:03

Any child with a loving and supportive caregiver is a lucky child. I do not give a single fk what that looks like in terms of gender, race, sexuality or if its adoptive parents, family members looking after the child.. whatever. As long as there's real love, honesty, trust, support, appropriate boundaries and guidance..
It would not enter my head to judge anyone for not having the traditional setup of a married man and women with their bio child. Because I absolutely know that some people in that setup are terrible parents with really unhappy kids. Because it's not about the setup it's about the actual parenting.

DonnaSueWeloveyou · 16/05/2025 22:04

Corneliusthecamel · 16/05/2025 14:26

Hi,

Recently, a close friendship has come to an end and it’s been difficult to process. Long story short - I am a woman married to another woman and I gave birth to a baby last year who was conceived via sperm donor/fertility treatment through the NHS. We are all really happy and she is beautiful.

A good, long term friend of mine has become increasingly distant over the past couple of years. I confronted her about this recently and she admitted that she struggles with my life choices and doesn’t feel it’s right that I have chosen to bring a baby up with another woman. She feels very strongly that a baby should have a traditional mum and dad unit where possible and feels that I am wrong for choosing this path.

Anyway, the friendship is over, and I think that’s the right thing for both of us - it’s not really possible to carry on when we both have such different views and experiences of the world.

But it has made me want to ask - what are your honest opinions of two women choosing to pursue fertility treatment and having a baby? Obviously it’s my life and I’m happy so in one way, who cares. But I truly didn’t think my friend held those types of views and often, people won’t speak their true thoughts in real life, so I am curious what people truly think about it

That’s a shame about your friendship - can you not talk about it and try to understand each other?

Will your baby have any relationship with its father?

Blogswife · 16/05/2025 22:13

There are many children in this world whose childhood isn’t as good as it should be, who are neglected or living with abusive parents .Having two parents who want and love their children is wonderful - the gender or sexual orientation of those parents is completely irrelevant .

Bobnobob · 16/05/2025 22:16

Lucky baby having 2 parents who went to such lengths to have them. Millions of kids are brought up in trauma, broken homes, poverty, in foster care etc etc. What a life of privilege your friend has led to not see that. Good riddance to her.

Oreo07 · 16/05/2025 22:16

Darkdiamond · 16/05/2025 16:13

I think that the optimal family situation is a mother and a father and that when a same sex couple bring a baby into their relationship, they are usually cutting out one of these family members.

I know that life happens and sometimes even the traditional set up falls apart leaving a single mum or dad, or whatever, but I don't like the idea of deliberately creating a family situation where one biological parent is absent from the arrangement by design. I don't like the idea of sperm or an egg being used and the 'provider' having no part in that child's life, as an integral part of making the situation work. I do know for sure that same-sex parents can of course be incredibly loving, attentive, doting and caring parents but it is a family structure where one person seems to be missing.

I've been in conversations where there have been comments such as 'Jenny doesn't have a dad' or 'Johnny doesn't have a mum' and my first thought is always 'of course they do!' I always feel a bit sad for the child that this has been decided for them. My feelings about female same sex and male same sex parenting are similar, although I view the male parents more unfavourably due to the inevitable surrogacy issue.

I don't voice any of these feelings ever or treat anyone any differently, but that is my view which I'm sharing in good faith as an answer to the question.

Agree with this.

financialcareerstuff · 16/05/2025 22:20

Absolutely 100% supportive. To me, the non- material things a child needs to be happy are love and reasonable stability. There is zero reason they can’t get that from two mums. And indeed, tragically, there is probably a higher probability of safety, due to the level of violence and sexual abuse within the male population as a whole.

I would hope you’ll make some effort to have positive male role models around, so she has a chance to experience what a healthy male-female relationship can feel like, giving her a good foundation, if she turns out heterosexual and building those relationships herself in adulthood. Or, if you go on to have a son, probably even more important. But that hope is no more or less than a million other hopes I would have for any child (to help them learn; to help them keep contact with their heritage; to give them a balance of stimulation and rest; to encourage them to read……), and I have no doubt whatsoever that you’ll already have thought of this, and if you disagree or can’t- fine! You’re the parents. No other parents need to do everything the way others think, so why would you?!

congratulations on your beautiful daughter- I’m glad you are all happy!

MyOliveHelper · 16/05/2025 22:26

AlorsTimeForWine · 16/05/2025 14:49

Interestingly... i was indifferent pre children and post children i feel strongly positively disposed towards it!!!! I gave our crib away to some lesbians and I thought how lucky the baby was 😅😅😅

Equally I now have more negative feelings towards gay male couples (which i did not at all have pre pregnancy) for 2 reasons

  1. The use of surrogacy which i am vehemently against in most circs
  2. My experience of husbands as parents. ALL of them "required training". Even when i think of the 2 x best fathers )and all of the fathers i know would be classified as better than average...) i think if the two of them had no woman to guide /train them the outcome would be sub ideal.

My dh thinks he is a good dad (so do i!) but agrees if he was cloned the prospect of the 2 of them being left alone with our babies doesnt bare thinking about 😵‍💫

Edited

I think at least half the belief that husbands need training comes from the false belief that there is one way to do things with a specific baby and other ways are wrong.

Scentedjasmin · 16/05/2025 22:28

I agree that 2 mums is great. Generally I wouldn't trust 2 men to look after a newborn baby (I wouldn't have trusted my own husband and my own father was only vaguely aware that he had children). I will make an exception for Oli Locke and Gareth though. They seem really lovely and grounded. I have seen one male gay couple be very transactional in the way that they treated the surrogate mother, with the baby being treated akin to a puppy and a doll. They, particularly one, was very attention seeking and immature. The other guy was much more grounded.

quietlysad · 16/05/2025 22:32

Noodleit · 16/05/2025 14:29

Great minds…

Me too!!! Might be just my experience of what a dad brings to the table but mine would be ferrel, hungry and illiterate without me!!!

MyOliveHelper · 16/05/2025 22:33

I don't completely disagree with any part of surrogacy, egg/sperm donation or IVF and I see nothing at all wrong with same sex parents. I am glad that children have the right to know who their biological/gestational parents are. I don't think you should go ahead with donation/surrogacy if you object to having any contact with a biological child. I'm unsure if you should have the right to trace the children born of your donations/surrogacy. Probably not.

I think women should retain the right to change their minds and keep a baby they give birth to if that is what they want. I think the idea of forcibly removing a baby that could be raised by its gestational parent is worse than the upset caused to the parents awaiting adoption. I don't dismiss the horrendous agony that causes the potential parents - I just think that is the lesser of two evils.

Genevieva · 16/05/2025 22:35

Whiteflowerscreed · 16/05/2025 14:28

I’ll probably get slated but here goes.

I have zero issues with two women raising a baby

and while I’m not against it, I feel a bit more anxious about two men raising a baby. Purely based on one couple we know thinking about having a baby and neither being particularly caring, selfless, nurturing etc. they are luxury jet setter types and I feel they wouldn’t bond/ connect/ cuddle/ put the baby first. I just think a baby needs a mummy. (At least one!!)

A gay couple we are friends with well shocked me in their transactional discussion of surrogacy. It really put me off. They decided against it, but it gave me similar reservations.

I still think the ideal parental set up for children involves a happily marriage heterosexual couple, but I’d choose happily married over heterosexual. Where there is no dad a close male relative like a hands-on granddad or godfather can provide something akin to a fatherly relationship,

Scentedjasmin · 16/05/2025 22:36

MyOliveHelper · 16/05/2025 22:26

I think at least half the belief that husbands need training comes from the false belief that there is one way to do things with a specific baby and other ways are wrong.

Generally there is only one way to do things with a newborn baby and the mother's way is always best. If you don't feed regularly/sterilise bottles, handle gently whilst supporting the neck, be extremely patient, ensure that the baby is dressed appropriately, that there is nothing that can cause them to suffocate or overheat, bath and change regularly and instinctively know when something is wrong, then you're doing it wrong. There is very little wriggle room for 'differing parental approaches' in the first year or so. After than, once you reach toddler stage, there is a bit more flexibility, but safety and predicting accidents is constant.

Gnomegarden32 · 16/05/2025 22:41

I disagree with those who say having a male and a female parent is the 'ideal' set up and actually find it quite bigoted. The ideal is two loving parents, full stop.

luceygoosey · 16/05/2025 22:44

Love is what makes a family, whether that’s a traditional mum and dad, two mums, mum and stepdad, two dads, single mum, single dad or any other configuration. What matters is that the parents do best by their children and raise them well.

Congratulations to you and your wife OP!

Notashamed13 · 16/05/2025 22:47

I'd 💯 rather have 2 mum's than 2 dad's! (My OH is a shit dad so judging by his standards and probably tarring most men with the same shit brush 😅)

christabellax · 16/05/2025 22:47

Parents who are Loving and actively interested in their children are the most important factors for me… makes no difference if it is a heterosexual or homosexual partnership.

babyproblems · 16/05/2025 22:48

I think it’s ok nurture wise but I will add I do think male role models are important and especially so in a set up with two women. Doesn’t matter whether child is boy or girl I think male role models and one male figure who they can have a really close relationship to is really important. Agree with all the pps saying I find a two dad set up not ok.

PurpleThistle7 · 16/05/2025 22:48

NoStoningsPlease · 16/05/2025 20:33

Name changed for this because it's such a delicate subject and I'm probably a bit on the conservative side.

Honestly I think the ideal situation is a loving and involved biological mother and father. But I acknowledge that "loving and involved" is not always the case when children are made the 'usual' way, either because the parents are together but one or both are unloving/uninvolved or because there is one absent parent somewhere down the line.

However, I'm slightly on the fence about whether it's fair or a particularly good idea to deliberately engineer a less than ideal situation re an absent father, whether that's single parenthood or same same sex couples, even when the mother is biologically related to and carries the child. Probably not, but then there are so many feckless fathers in "normal" circumstances I question whether the odds of an ideal circumstance in the traditional set up are compelling enough to properly take against that particular alternative given the primary bond is maintained.

I absolutely do not support surrogacy - for gay men, heterosexual couples or lesbians. Anyone. Because it involves the deliberate breaking of the maternal bond at birth in order to serve the desires of adults. I think it's unutterably selfish to knowingly and deliberately inflict that on a newborn for your own purposes.

Adoption is different because it's making the best of a less than ideal circumstance that has arisen through circumstance rather than being orchestrated for the benefit of adults. Re who adopts, I'm open to research re what works best for the children (which i think should be the only criterion) but if it's a choice between the care system and any loving substitute parent (single, couple, gay, straight, male, female) I would expect the latter to be better for the child every time.

Oh and I think that every child, in every circumstance, should have an absolute right to know who their biological parents are.

So I suppose i think it's always weighing a situation up against the alternatives to make a judgement. I think that the only criterion should be what is optimal for the child - adult feelings and wants and equality and 'fairness' should count for exactly nothing when considering child welfare.

I've thought this through as I've typed so fully expect that there are things I haven't thought of, but those are my immediate two cents! Interesting question, OP.

Edited

Curious just because I’ve not heard this specific opinion before - this ‘absolute right’ for a child to know their biological parents. What about rape? Or incest? Or some other horrible situation I can’t even think about? Do you think a rapist has the right to know their child? And the child is obliged to know about their creation if it will be traumatic?

not arguing just thinking about it as I have a friend who knows exactly how he came to be and it’s been a horrible thing for him. I feel like he might have benefitted from knowing less.

MyOliveHelper · 16/05/2025 22:49

Scentedjasmin · 16/05/2025 22:36

Generally there is only one way to do things with a newborn baby and the mother's way is always best. If you don't feed regularly/sterilise bottles, handle gently whilst supporting the neck, be extremely patient, ensure that the baby is dressed appropriately, that there is nothing that can cause them to suffocate or overheat, bath and change regularly and instinctively know when something is wrong, then you're doing it wrong. There is very little wriggle room for 'differing parental approaches' in the first year or so. After than, once you reach toddler stage, there is a bit more flexibility, but safety and predicting accidents is constant.

Feeding regularly can mean several things and all are correct as long as baby is nourished.

Yes you have to support the baby's neck, but other than that, the correct way is whatever way(s) the baby is comfy and safe.

Dressing appropriately might mean a whole "day" outfit, it also could be a baby grow and vest. Both are appropriate. Neither are right or wrong.

I come from a culture where we bathe our babies daily. I know many of you do not. As long as neither of our babies are suffering from skin issues as a result of our methods, neither of us are right or wrong.

I see many mothers as a midwife who don't know what is "instinctively wrong". They develop knowledge of their baby over time. They aren't doing it wrong and neither are dads who have to learn this either. They need to be given space to learn it without judgement or micromanaging.

There needs to be room for different parenting approaches if you want a co-parent, and not a disgruntled assistant who can't parent when you need them to.

Women need to stop thinking we're these magical maternal goddesses who know everything and their useless men know nothing. It puts us under pressure, let alone the men.

IamSallyBowles · 16/05/2025 22:50

outraged and amazed by the homophobia here - I think I have actually reached my breaking point with Mumsnet now.

So my friend, a single dad because his son's mother died cant be a parent because he is male? Or is that OK because it wasn't his fault and it was a heterosexual relationship before she died? What if he has a relationship with a man now? Should he not be a father to his child or is he not allowed to be bisexual?

Sorry OP - I know a gorgeous lesbian couple with two kids. They each carried one and they have the same biological father who is involved in their lives. They are a beautiful happy loving family. two mums, two dads, one of each, step, half adopted as long as they're loved and cared for and happy your kids will do great.

Namechanger2578 · 16/05/2025 22:50

ByGraceAlone · 16/05/2025 15:14

All children have a mother and a father and should have a right to have a relationship with both parents.

Sometimes that's not possible or in the child's best interests because one parent absent themselves, dies or is a danger to the child.

But to create children with the explicit intention to deprive them of one of their parents and that role in their life, to meet adults needs, is not something I agree with as I think we should put child's needs first.

Having said that I am friends with a lesbian couple who have children together. They are wonderful parents and a happy family, but I do think it is wrong to plan to deprive children of a father.

We remain friends however because I don't think it's my place to openly judge others lives. Believe me there is plenty they could judge me and my patenting on, but they don't. Not to my face anyway 😁.

They probably suspect my views due to my religious beliefs but we accept our differences and manage to remain friends.

If explicitly asked though I'd express my opinion above. But as I'm not asked I don't.

Your friend is an idiot who should focus on her own life.

I agree with this. Ideally, a child has a right to and should have a mum and a dad, i.e., 1 parent of each sex. I do believe that children of each sex get different things from each parent, and part of that is due to the sex of the parent.

I don't agree with surrogacy at all, and donor sperm also has its issues imo.

Obviously, the ideal isn't always possible as families break up, etc, and a loving, safe home is important, so better that than a dysfunctional/abusive 2 parent (1m,1f) family.

When it comes to adopting, again, I believe the best scenario is 2 parents, one male, one female, but in this case, 1 loving parent or 2 of the same sex is better than being in the care system.

Roxietrees · 16/05/2025 22:51

Delphinium20 · 16/05/2025 21:37

I feel no negative issues of two women raising a baby. I do think that the idea of one mom carrying the other mom's fetus is dangerous to birth mom and baby for health reasons (for the same reasons it's a bad idea for straight women who plan to be surrogates).

I have several friends who are lesbians and raising their children - vast majority are fabulous moms! One friend is a bit selfish in her general nature, but her wife makes up for it. Not dissimilar from my straight friends. I do think, if possible, make babies with a man who donated sperm and wants to be in your children's lives. Anonymous sperm donation and/or absent dads aren't ideal for any kid, but I'm not terribly against it. This is gentle advice I'd give to straight or lesbian friends only if they asked. I do have a straight friend who went the sperm route as a single mom and her kids are happy...I've never said a thing because she never asked me what I thought!

While I think gay men can be great dads, I really hate those who use a surrogate and purchase eggs. I find it appalling. I guess it's because I strongly believe babies need their mothers and using a woman's body to give you a baby is as vile as it gets.

What evidence do you have that reciprocal IVF (one mum carrying the baby made from other mum’s egg) is dangerous?! Did you just make that up? I did this. It is exactly the same process as any IVF procedure- the only difference is the embryo goes into a different womb…which functions in the exact same way as every other healthy womb in the world. We have a very healthy, happy little girl. It worked first time and there were no issues or dangers whatsoever

PurpleThistle7 · 16/05/2025 22:53

Am frankly bewildered at how many people are fine with two mothers but not with two fathers. There are many, many families who are not biologically related so any combination or 1/2 parents might not be biologically related to any combination of their children.

i know an absolutely beautiful family - two men adopted two brothers out of foster care. The boys had a terrible start and have many challenges because of it and their lives are infinitely better now that they have parents. Their apparently superior setup of one mother and one father were abusive and neglectful and frankly shocking and they were removed and placed with two lovely and loving men who had been married for years. I cannot see any problems with this at all.

Mumtobabyhavoc · 16/05/2025 22:54

TENSsion · 16/05/2025 21:49

Well, you’ve convinced me you have salient points on the topic 😂

That was easy. 😅

Roxietrees · 16/05/2025 22:55

Ottersmith · 16/05/2025 21:45

Look at all the women on here who have had children with feckless lazy men. Or abusive men! So many Fathers just fuck off and leave their children and they only have one parent anyway, so having two loving parents can't be a bad thing.
I am someone who seriously considered using donor sperm, BUT I do think it is exploitative. It wouldn't have stopped me from using it, but it needs acknowledging that it is exploitative. Not as exploitative as surrogacy though. I do have problems with babies being taken away from their Mother and given to men. A baby needs it's Mother.

I do know a lesbian couple who had a baby, and the non pregnant one acted like a twat and had an affair when her wife was 7 months pregnant, then fucked off. Then she demanded rights to see the baby, overnight stays when the baby was tiny etc. So yes both parents need their parental responsibility enshrined in law, UNLESS one of them is a twat and can't even stick around for the birth. Then they forfeit their rights.

Why is sperm donation exploitative? In the US maybe but not anywhere else in the world.