@TheWisePlumDuck
"Where is this bizarre behaviour around recent conflicts coming from? It's almost like some white people have a checklist in order to determine who is the biggest 'victim' in often centuries old complicated feuds. Bonus points for being brown, Muslim and fond of terrorism it seems.
Then they immediately jump in with both feet to uncritically support one side, and scream 'racist' and 'bigot' at any sane person who hasn't done the same. Often being as ignorant of history as those they accuse of the same, and unable to believe any bad or ill of their 'side'.
Has this always been the case or am I only noticing it now?"
So you need to start with the key differences in how the liberal left and the conservative right view conflicts
From the liberal left viewpoint there is always a weaker victim and a stronger oppressor. It started with Marx and the proletariat workers being exploited by their bourgeois factory owners or farm workers being exploited by the land owners.
So in any conflict the stronger or winning side is always the oppressor (and therefore in the wrong) and the weaker side will be the victim (and therefore in the right) regardless of how the conflict started.
Whereas the conservative right has a simpler view on who started the conflict with the "blame" going to whoever started the conflict and if "whoever started it " ends up being beaten by the stronger side then they only have themselves to blame for "starting" the conflict.
The liberal left see "who started the fight " as more complex looking at years of grievances rather than simply who fired the first shot or threw the first punch.
Secondly there is a high level of self hate for the West, its values and its history by the liberal left.
This started in the 1960s with students who felt that they were critical thinkers (or "edgy ") by not simply accepting the patriotic narrative or pride in their country, its actions and its history but instead criticising it.
This attitude has now become prevalent especially amongst the university educated left leaning middle class but not amongst the non university educated working classes. So that in every conflict involving the West, then the West is in the wrong or in any conflict not directly involving the West then for historical reasons the West is still to blame.
Ironically by hating Western values the liberal left is undermining the very same Western values of freedom of speech, democracy etc etc that allow them in the first place to criticise western values and therefore sowing the seeds of its own destruction.