But who is deciding what's essential in your system?
For example my dd is in school atm for 3 hours a week, her world is tiny and she has no social life at all.
I pay for a couple of subscriptions for her where she can go online and chat to people like her so she gets some interaction at least. That's not technically essential, but it's a real lifeline for her.
I already said the private things we pay for wouldn't be considered essential because we had the minimum NHS appointments.
The educational things maybe would if she was fully home schooled, but she's enrolled at school, even though it's very part time, so I would have to limit her world even more for her tutor and books to be considered essential.
This is the problem, when people are looking at the money, and wanting it reduced because some may take the piss, then its people like my dd and I that will be affected the most. We both want to be better, and the money is an essential part of that atm, if we don't have that then we are both stuck in the benefits cycle forever, my dd would very likely never have a job or contribute to society financially.
As it stands there's a good chance she will.
The state doesn't provide the lifestyle I used to have by any means, but we are comfortable enough at the moment, and it's shocking to think, after all we have been through, that it's begrudged.