Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

PIP for ADHD

443 replies

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 10:20

Been in the news this morning as labour looking to slash benefits bills the cost is enormous and growing.

One of the main points discussed was getting PIP for ADHD I did not think this was possible …🤔.

We are taxed more than ever so cuts will abve to be made but surely this is madness giving out PIP for ADHD …there are genuine claims but… they said there are a 1000 new people per day now claiming PIP…so those on the make are going to spoil or for genuine a claims but something is very wrong 😦with the benefits system.

The numbers we are spending on benefits are incredible …let’s see what they slash but cuts are coming under Labour as it’s got out of hand.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
LadyKenya · 16/03/2025 12:34

ladymammalade · 16/03/2025 12:05

I will never understand how PIP is calculated.

I know some people with disabilities that render them incapable of doing much independently who get refused it and have to appeal even when their situation is never going to change. I know someone else who’s young and physically fit, drives a car, travels up and down the country for his hobby, who gets pip for adhd/depression 🤷🏼‍♀️

Do you live with that person who is young, fit, blah blah blah? Then the chances are that you have no idea of his day, to day life, or struggles.

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 12:38

And this thread is the proof as to why the likes of Trump got in, increasingly more European countries are moving to the right and we are in a mess.

If you dare to ask why benefits are so high you get set upon….this is alway the defence when someone dares to ask oh it’s straight out the DM playbook yada, yada…

You can’t don’t dare ask or question about benefits…well that no longer flies as lots are fed up and scared to ask as this thread shows time and again you get nasty and rude answers…and arms and legs added !

Well some are in for a rude awakening…akin to how rude many have been for dared to be questioned about how tax payers money is funding so many benefits….

OP posts:
Morph22010 · 16/03/2025 12:38

Whatevershallidowithmylife · 16/03/2025 12:22

You also have to provide supporting evidence from GP, Consultants etc

What’s happens to people who aren’t under a consultant? My son was disagnosed autistic at 6 and discharged on diagnosis. he is severe enough that he attends a special school and has ehcp so we have all that as evidence at the minute. It would be my absolute dream that he could hold down a job and work full time but it’s looking unlikely. As an adult he’ll have no evidence

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Sirzy · 16/03/2025 12:39

when you ask a question generally you pay attention to the answers and learn from them. Sadly it seems your incapable of that and just want to have a pile on about the people who dare claim benefits to help them live.

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 12:40

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 12:38

And this thread is the proof as to why the likes of Trump got in, increasingly more European countries are moving to the right and we are in a mess.

If you dare to ask why benefits are so high you get set upon….this is alway the defence when someone dares to ask oh it’s straight out the DM playbook yada, yada…

You can’t don’t dare ask or question about benefits…well that no longer flies as lots are fed up and scared to ask as this thread shows time and again you get nasty and rude answers…and arms and legs added !

Well some are in for a rude awakening…akin to how rude many have been for dared to be questioned about how tax payers money is funding so many benefits….

55% of the benefits bill is for pension, pension credit and related benefits.

aAre you going to go after pensioners too or just those you seem to have made up disabilities?

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 12:40

Sirzy · 16/03/2025 12:39

when you ask a question generally you pay attention to the answers and learn from them. Sadly it seems your incapable of that and just want to have a pile on about the people who dare claim benefits to help them live.

Jog on …

OP posts:
Coffeeishot · 16/03/2025 12:42

Morph22010 · 16/03/2025 12:38

What’s happens to people who aren’t under a consultant? My son was disagnosed autistic at 6 and discharged on diagnosis. he is severe enough that he attends a special school and has ehcp so we have all that as evidence at the minute. It would be my absolute dream that he could hold down a job and work full time but it’s looking unlikely. As an adult he’ll have no evidence

He will he will be able to use the evidence from school and if he goes onto maybe college you can use this as evidence, not everything has to be from medical professionals,but your Gp can also provide evidence.

Morph22010 · 16/03/2025 12:43

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 12:38

And this thread is the proof as to why the likes of Trump got in, increasingly more European countries are moving to the right and we are in a mess.

If you dare to ask why benefits are so high you get set upon….this is alway the defence when someone dares to ask oh it’s straight out the DM playbook yada, yada…

You can’t don’t dare ask or question about benefits…well that no longer flies as lots are fed up and scared to ask as this thread shows time and again you get nasty and rude answers…and arms and legs added !

Well some are in for a rude awakening…akin to how rude many have been for dared to be questioned about how tax payers money is funding so many benefits….

You will be in for a rude awakening if you are unlucky enough to have a life changing accident or develop a condition or have a child with autism or another condition

CautiousLurker01 · 16/03/2025 12:43

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

No they didn’t. It’s a payment to offset the costs of being disabled by a condition that a non disabled person does not have to incur.

I have ASD/ADHD and it doesn’t impact me financially; my younger DS has ASD but again it does not disable him in a way that costs us additional money. However, my DD has ASD/ADHD/and a multitude of MH issues that DO disable her.

The PIP covers specialist therapy, the £100pcm cost of medications that were crippling (until GP recently agreed to take shared care and prescribe on the NHS); it covers taxis to/from tech college if I am not available to collect her f she has a MH crisis; it contributes to the petrol I spend taking her. I am unable to get a FT job due to her needs, so have no income of my own, nor can I claim carers allowance as I am a FT student (based at home, utterly flexible but it bars me from claiming) and nor would I necessarily want to as DH has a great job but the impact is that I personally am out of pocket… so being able to pay for her meds, travel, therapy out of this money is helpful.

Any money left over after these costs goes into her personal account to buy clothes and give a measure of independence (she can go to the cinema with a friend and pay her way). We view it as money that will scaffold her into independence and are hoping that when her current award runs out in 4-5years she may not need PIP anymore - largely because of the impact this money has had on helping her manage and adapt to her disability (she is going to university this year and has career ideas where accommodations might easily be made for her).

I do, however, support a review to ensure that this is precisely the way it is used so that those who will need it for life can have access to it, and those who are playing the system weeded out.

LadyKenya · 16/03/2025 12:44

I will never understand those with a mindset, that would be gleeful to see vulnerable members of Society, further disadvantaged. So many people begrudging others perceived benefits.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy9dgwe1q27o

Morph22010 · 16/03/2025 12:44

Coffeeishot · 16/03/2025 12:42

He will he will be able to use the evidence from school and if he goes onto maybe college you can use this as evidence, not everything has to be from medical professionals,but your Gp can also provide evidence.

I’m just thinking of say in 30 years time when he’s been out of school for years what do we use as evidence? He barely sees the gp as he refuses to go

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 12:46

Morph22010 · 16/03/2025 12:44

I’m just thinking of say in 30 years time when he’s been out of school for years what do we use as evidence? He barely sees the gp as he refuses to go

The National Autistic Society can probably help with signposting to support to claim

CeeJay81 · 16/03/2025 12:47

80smonster · 16/03/2025 12:33

Labour will be taxing everyone to hilt, to raise funds to fix the infrastructure issues the UK has. Lower and middle earners should pay more tax, everyone’s contribution needs to be more sizeable. I am not sad to see cuts to benefits, if education and health services are broken, benefits are a sticking plaster over more serious issues. I would be interested to see free childcare for all earners introduced, since that for me is a benefit with a growth mindset, rather than handouts that aren’t aimed at getting or keeping people working.

Just how are low earners supposed to be pay more tax? People on minimum wage are often worse off than people on benefits. Not that I want to detail the thread, as Pip isn't to do with being able to work.

ZigZagJigsaw · 16/03/2025 12:49

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 12:33

Sorry my bad. I entirely agree with help to buy being a bit of a swizz

You still can’t compare cars that are leases unless you think it’s ok for people to be trapped in their homes unable to access society

As I said in my original post, I’m not having a dig at those who claim. I have an issue with who is actually profiting from it. Have a look at the CEOs of Motability and how much public money was being funnelled off. Do you think it’s right that tax payer money should be funnelled off to line the already rich’s pockets further?

No33 · 16/03/2025 12:49

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 10:47

I am not benefits bashing!! It’s all over the news and papers as Labour are cutting the benefits bill.

This was the main topic as people shocked at what PIP is being given for the topic was ADHD.

You're just repeating yourself.

Do you want to reply to some of the comments? Without just repeating your Op?

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 12:52

I’ve said why I’ve got to say my issue is not with bona fide people it’s is those gaming the system ….they need to be weeded out. They exist despite what many on here seem to think.

The tax burden is now so high and it’s not helping anyone …

OP posts:
SmallSoupcon · 16/03/2025 12:54

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 12:38

And this thread is the proof as to why the likes of Trump got in, increasingly more European countries are moving to the right and we are in a mess.

If you dare to ask why benefits are so high you get set upon….this is alway the defence when someone dares to ask oh it’s straight out the DM playbook yada, yada…

You can’t don’t dare ask or question about benefits…well that no longer flies as lots are fed up and scared to ask as this thread shows time and again you get nasty and rude answers…and arms and legs added !

Well some are in for a rude awakening…akin to how rude many have been for dared to be questioned about how tax payers money is funding so many benefits….

Well at least we know you were only posting to get validation of your uninformed opinion. Thanks for confirming.

You had an opportunity to learn more about the system and the specific condition you think is a joke. You decided not to, which is a shame. But I guess that wasn't the purpose of the thread...

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 12:55

ZigZagJigsaw · 16/03/2025 12:49

As I said in my original post, I’m not having a dig at those who claim. I have an issue with who is actually profiting from it. Have a look at the CEOs of Motability and how much public money was being funnelled off. Do you think it’s right that tax payer money should be funnelled off to line the already rich’s pockets further?

I would happily see an alternative but I think it would be naïve to suggest that any scheme the involved the exchange of goods for cash will not benefit a fat cat somewhere.

Perhaps if the UK actually made corporations pay their taxes instead of finding loopholes to avoid tax the cats wouldn’t be so fat. But that’s naïve too - the cats would simply raise their prices - look at the record profits being made out of the cost of living crisis.

ItGhoul · 16/03/2025 12:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

That’s utter bollocks.

XenoBitch · 16/03/2025 12:57

There was a lady on another thread that said she claims PIP, and has ADHD.... but her PIP is for her other conditions and not ADHD. But, you list all conditions on PIP forms, so her claim would be in the figures for claiming for ADHD.

In any case, PIP is awarded based on how you are affected by your disability, and not what the name of it is. And, it is notoriously hard to claim. You need a lot of evidence. You can't just go to the GP, get given pills and then money. The whole process is stressful there are a great many people who would be entitled to it but are put off by it all (I am one of them).

VastOtter · 16/03/2025 12:57

It’s extremely difficult to qualify for PIP, I’d guess that those getting it for ADHD also have other issues.

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 12:59

@ItGhoul It’s been in the newspapers and mainstream tv channels this morning …🙂the amount spent on new cars funded/financed by benefits…

OP posts:
Guavafish1 · 16/03/2025 13:01

£1700 per month

Sensitive content
PIP for ADHD
LadyKenya · 16/03/2025 13:01

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 12:59

@ItGhoul It’s been in the newspapers and mainstream tv channels this morning …🙂the amount spent on new cars funded/financed by benefits…

Good, it is all helping to generate income in this Country, and help the Economy, Win, win.

ZigZagJigsaw · 16/03/2025 13:03

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 12:55

I would happily see an alternative but I think it would be naïve to suggest that any scheme the involved the exchange of goods for cash will not benefit a fat cat somewhere.

Perhaps if the UK actually made corporations pay their taxes instead of finding loopholes to avoid tax the cats wouldn’t be so fat. But that’s naïve too - the cats would simply raise their prices - look at the record profits being made out of the cost of living crisis.

I’m not sure whether you have an agenda, hence the misunderstandings to deflect. But you definitely seem very keen on on excusing the wealthy who are unnecessarily and hugely profiting from public funds.

Most decent people would prefer that public money goes to those who need it.