Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

PIP for ADHD

443 replies

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 10:20

Been in the news this morning as labour looking to slash benefits bills the cost is enormous and growing.

One of the main points discussed was getting PIP for ADHD I did not think this was possible …🤔.

We are taxed more than ever so cuts will abve to be made but surely this is madness giving out PIP for ADHD …there are genuine claims but… they said there are a 1000 new people per day now claiming PIP…so those on the make are going to spoil or for genuine a claims but something is very wrong 😦with the benefits system.

The numbers we are spending on benefits are incredible …let’s see what they slash but cuts are coming under Labour as it’s got out of hand.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
ZigZagJigsaw · 16/03/2025 15:33

DaffodilsGalore · 16/03/2025 15:02

That’s not quite right. More complicated than that.

There is the Motabilty scheme that is NFP. But the bit that is running Motability, aka buys the cars, lends them etc… is an Ltd. Owned by 4 banks.
Those £7 billions? They’re sitting there in those banks.

And even wo that, if they can make a profit from Motability, then they should lower the starting amount needed to get the car, lower payments, whatever. No need for a £7 billions ‘buffer’. That’s not a buffer. That's greed.

Correct Motability Operations is owned by Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds and NatWest. It looks like the government have been aware of governance issues and “obscene” executive pay since 2018, amongst other issues.

https://cardealermagazine.co.uk/publish/profits-collapsed-at-motability-despite-revenue-and-customer-numbers-soaring-in-2024/311770

Profits collapsed at Motability despite revenue and customer numbers soaring in 2024 – Car Dealer Magazine

The holding company of charity Motability turned a £748m profit before tax in 2023 into a whopping £565m LOSS last year. Accounts filed under Motability

https://cardealermagazine.co.uk/publish/profits-collapsed-at-motability-despite-revenue-and-customer-numbers-soaring-in-2024/311770

Starlightstarbright4 · 16/03/2025 15:35

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 16/03/2025 15:28

Indeed.

I have adhd that is absolutely crippling in some areas of my life but I also happen to be a higher rate tax payer. I wonder how that squares with the OP's prejudices.

It will be twisted to if you can why can’t everyone else ..

They don’t see different people are affected differently by the same diagnosis .

people are blindly falling into people with disabilities are faking it , don’t deserve help . It’s all a media narrative- people love to blame someone else

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 15:36

Morph22010 · 16/03/2025 15:26

But if they had a job they would have their earnings and the pip money. Pip isn’t means tested at all, you can receive it if you earn £100,000 a year and meet the criteria. It’s not a disincentive to work it is to cover additional costs that arise from the disability

So if you earn £100k per year, and get PIP to meet additional costs associated with ADHD, what additional high costs are there going to be that cannot be met from the £100k yearly income? Clearly if holding down a £100k job, you’re capable of working. Therapy needed maybe? Medication/prescription costs? How are these sort of costs going to eat away at your £100k salary to such an extent that it would put you into poverty?

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Sirzy · 16/03/2025 15:45

The problem if you start to means test disability benefits is it is those who are just over the threshold that will end up being the ones who are really hurt by it.

The costs of being disabled are well documented and PIP and DLA are designed to try to balance that out a bit. They are also gateways to other things like blue badges

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 15:49

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 15:36

So if you earn £100k per year, and get PIP to meet additional costs associated with ADHD, what additional high costs are there going to be that cannot be met from the £100k yearly income? Clearly if holding down a £100k job, you’re capable of working. Therapy needed maybe? Medication/prescription costs? How are these sort of costs going to eat away at your £100k salary to such an extent that it would put you into poverty?

You don’t have to be in poverty to be unable to afford £60/hour therapy every week.

Means testing PIP I think would be a bad idea as those most affected would likely be the ones who are just over the threshold - I’d much rather see people able to access the world with some outliers claiming PIP who could easily afford the additional costs that their disability creates.

CatsWhiskerz · 16/03/2025 15:54

Sunshineandoranges · 16/03/2025 15:22

A brave post. This needs open discussion not aggressive responses.

It also needs to be researched somewhat first by the OP so it's not full of holes and ableist

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 16:01

Morph22010 · 16/03/2025 15:17

The op of this thread isn’t saying to crack down on charlatans or scammers it is directly attacking people who claim and have adhd

Eh? have you actually read what I wrote…nope!

Scammers need to be weeded out, there are those playing the system and that needs to be cracked down upon…I’ve no issue with those who are legitimate.

Stop making stuff up..

I’m not saying anymore as per usual people go on the attack when they don’t like a topic …it’s tit for tat and plain nasty.

A discussion needs to be had as the benefits bill is massive and many families can’t afford any more tax hikes to cover what’s anticipated as the costs this coming year …

OP posts:
marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 16:05

CatsWhiskerz · 16/03/2025 15:54

It also needs to be researched somewhat first by the OP so it's not full of holes and ableist

It’s not full of holes and ableist …every excuse under the sun when someone has an opposing view!

you shoot them down i.e. me in this instance and jump on any poster in agreement….take a look around this type of behaviour is why Reform are on the rise…people not being listened to.

OP posts:
HollyBerryz · 16/03/2025 16:06

Sunshineandoranges · 16/03/2025 15:22

A brave post. This needs open discussion not aggressive responses.

Open discussion requires an open mind. Op has already made hers up based on inaccurate froth inducing headlines.

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 16:06

Sunshineandoranges · 16/03/2025 15:22

A brave post. This needs open discussion not aggressive responses.

Thanks @Sunshineandoranges 🙂!

Another sensible person on this thread.

OP posts:
spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 16:07

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 16:05

It’s not full of holes and ableist …every excuse under the sun when someone has an opposing view!

you shoot them down i.e. me in this instance and jump on any poster in agreement….take a look around this type of behaviour is why Reform are on the rise…people not being listened to.

So you don’t think it’s ableist to be flabbergasted at people with a neurodevelopmental disability being able to claim disability benefits?

Because that’s what you posted.

HollyBerryz · 16/03/2025 16:07

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 15:23

Yep,I’m watched it too. Bit of an eye opener. MNs are always quick to point out that it’s virtually impossible to get PIP. Yet apparently there are 1000 people accepted daily. 4 million people of working age now claiming disability, compared to 2.8 million 5 years ago. It’s now very clear that this particular gravy train has to be slowed down and ways looked into getting people into work. I can only see huge problems getting claims through for ADHD for PIP. There’s already huge waiting lists, growing daily, for formal diagnosis’s of ADHD and Autism. If there was a possibility of claiming the (apparently difficult to get) PIP, the applications for diagnosis would spiral out of control.

I mean I hate to point out the obvious, but something quite significant happened 5 years ago.

SleeplessinPendle · 16/03/2025 16:08

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 16:01

Eh? have you actually read what I wrote…nope!

Scammers need to be weeded out, there are those playing the system and that needs to be cracked down upon…I’ve no issue with those who are legitimate.

Stop making stuff up..

I’m not saying anymore as per usual people go on the attack when they don’t like a topic …it’s tit for tat and plain nasty.

A discussion needs to be had as the benefits bill is massive and many families can’t afford any more tax hikes to cover what’s anticipated as the costs this coming year …

Your posts aren't centered around scammers, they are centered around those with ADHD, a disability.

You havent answered my question, are you actually higher earner? If you don't believe in a society that supports everyone, why not focus on able bodied people that take out more than they put in? As they have more ability to earn more. Is it because you are in that bracket?

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 16:10

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 15:49

You don’t have to be in poverty to be unable to afford £60/hour therapy every week.

Means testing PIP I think would be a bad idea as those most affected would likely be the ones who are just over the threshold - I’d much rather see people able to access the world with some outliers claiming PIP who could easily afford the additional costs that their disability creates.

But if you’re on £100k annual salary, £60 per week therapy is not going to cause you financial hardship. And if does, adjustments to your living costs will have to be made to accommodate it. Even with the therapy charges, £100k salary is a pretty decent amount of money to provide you with a decent standard of living. I think if the Government do want to support people with ADHD with costs associated with getting therapy/medication, then they should pay the money direct to therapists/free prescriptions for medication, rather than pay directly to the claimant.

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 16:14

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 16:10

But if you’re on £100k annual salary, £60 per week therapy is not going to cause you financial hardship. And if does, adjustments to your living costs will have to be made to accommodate it. Even with the therapy charges, £100k salary is a pretty decent amount of money to provide you with a decent standard of living. I think if the Government do want to support people with ADHD with costs associated with getting therapy/medication, then they should pay the money direct to therapists/free prescriptions for medication, rather than pay directly to the claimant.

Do you think it’s a is a good idea for the government to police exactly what people spend their benefits on? How much do you think that would cost to monitor and enforce?
I can tell you auditing customers who have attracted direct payments via a care and support plan takes up an insane amount of local authorities time.
is it really a good idea to do this for all benefits?

Sirzy · 16/03/2025 16:15

marshmallowmix · 16/03/2025 16:05

It’s not full of holes and ableist …every excuse under the sun when someone has an opposing view!

you shoot them down i.e. me in this instance and jump on any poster in agreement….take a look around this type of behaviour is why Reform are on the rise…people not being listened to.

Attitudes like yours are why Reform are on the rise.

People who believe they are experts on a topic they haven’t got the faintest idea about and then shout down those who do have experience when they point on the flaws in your arguments.

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 16:15

HollyBerryz · 16/03/2025 16:07

I mean I hate to point out the obvious, but something quite significant happened 5 years ago.

And? Covid has just created another excuse. I have long Covid. Diagnosed, where I have no smell or taste (affecting my MH massively initially, although it’s my new norm now, and I just have to get on with it) I get breathless and tired easy. But life goes on. As a large percentage of that extra over a million people are not claiming to be disabled on the back of Covid, I fail to see how that’s relevant?

BurntBroccoli · 16/03/2025 16:17

Owlcat42 · 16/03/2025 10:45

Undiagnosed ADHD destroyed my partner’s mental health, work life and relationships, before being diagnosed in his 40s. I totally get that it’s a sliding scale in terms of how much people are affected by it, and that there may be over-diagnosis, particularly in the private sector. But when it’s bad it can severely affect people’s daily lives.

Incidentally he doesn’t drive because he says he would not be a safe driver as he’s so easily distracted. He tried for a mobility payment to help with (public) transport costs but didn’t get it.

Yes same with my daughter. It’s a genuinely awful condition- she is pretty much housebound and won’t go outside without someone with her.

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 16:20

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 16:14

Do you think it’s a is a good idea for the government to police exactly what people spend their benefits on? How much do you think that would cost to monitor and enforce?
I can tell you auditing customers who have attracted direct payments via a care and support plan takes up an insane amount of local authorities time.
is it really a good idea to do this for all benefits?

I would imagine the costs of implementing and sustaining a scheme like this would probably cost less long term than the money we’re haemorrhaging out of the system currently.

HollyBerryz · 16/03/2025 16:30

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 16:15

And? Covid has just created another excuse. I have long Covid. Diagnosed, where I have no smell or taste (affecting my MH massively initially, although it’s my new norm now, and I just have to get on with it) I get breathless and tired easy. But life goes on. As a large percentage of that extra over a million people are not claiming to be disabled on the back of Covid, I fail to see how that’s relevant?

Okay well that speaks volumes really doesn't it. I'm alright and manage so everyone else who's had covid is the same and should be able to manage too.

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 16:37

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 16:20

I would imagine the costs of implementing and sustaining a scheme like this would probably cost less long term than the money we’re haemorrhaging out of the system currently.

Ok. That’s 22.4 million people that need regular monitoring of how they’re spending their benefits - 12.7 of those are of state pension age being told how to spend their pension.

Good luck.

PickAChew · 16/03/2025 16:58

NoMoreCoffeePlease · 16/03/2025 15:14

PIP for ADHD is definitely a thing, and people exaggerate their symptoms. I know someone who would be able to have a (part-time?) job but doesn't as PIP pays more. They go on all the school walks, trips etc as they have their days off.

You can claim PIP and work.

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 17:06

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 16:37

Ok. That’s 22.4 million people that need regular monitoring of how they’re spending their benefits - 12.7 of those are of state pension age being told how to spend their pension.

Good luck.

Pension isn't a benefit. Everyone over pensionable age receives it. All of whom gave paid into it. Pension top up is different, but otherwise not a benefit. I'm not a pensioner, but certainly dont begrudge those who claim it. It's a right......

spicemaiden · 16/03/2025 17:11

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 17:06

Pension isn't a benefit. Everyone over pensionable age receives it. All of whom gave paid into it. Pension top up is different, but otherwise not a benefit. I'm not a pensioner, but certainly dont begrudge those who claim it. It's a right......

This benefits bill labour are banging on about…the largest proportion of it is made up by state pension.

https://obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-pensioner-benefits/

Welfare spending: pensioner benefits - Office for Budget Responsibility

Welfare spending is the biggest source of AME spending, with pensioner spending the biggest item in the social security budget (accounting for 46 per cent of the total in 2020-21, down from 49 per cent in 2019-20).

https://obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-pensioner-benefits/

SleeplessinPendle · 16/03/2025 17:15

Livelovebehappy · 16/03/2025 17:06

Pension isn't a benefit. Everyone over pensionable age receives it. All of whom gave paid into it. Pension top up is different, but otherwise not a benefit. I'm not a pensioner, but certainly dont begrudge those who claim it. It's a right......

But is it a right? If the argument is that we can't afford to continue supporting people then should those that have taken more out of the system than they have put in recieve it? If disabled people should be scrutinised, why not able bodied people? Maybe we should have a team that works out how many state educated DC you have, how much you have cost the NHS then give people anything left over. We either want a system that supports everyone or we don't. A system that doesn't support anyone is cheap for the government. You just get rid of free schooling, free health care etc. Why are the most vulnerable always the targets of these conversations when the majority of able bodied people in this country take more than they contribute?

Swipe left for the next trending thread