Matt Gaetz is a shocker - horrid sleazy man. Qualified lawyer, loves showboating at congressional hearings. He is currently being investigated for sexting/meeting a 17yo and arranging to meet her out of state - meaning it's sex trafficking of a minor. He is a surprise pick, totally unsuitable for AG.
RFK was rumoured to be in the frame a while ago but is a vaccine and fluoride denier, hates big pharma, medical adverts and UPFs.
I've been wondering if Matt Gaetz has been floated by Trump as an "oh my god, anyone but him" candidate, so when he's rejected by the Senate whoever the second choice turns out to be will seem quite reasonable in comparison? It would also solve a problem if Trump had promised Gaetz a nomination in exchange for support (or something), but didn't really want him to get through the process. The AG role is one of the most important, no way he'll ever be approved. Trump would've met his side of the deal in nominating him and the knock-back would not be Trump's problem?
RFK - I think he really wants him for the role for some reason, though only heard Trump praise his attitude to UPFs, healthy eating, over medicalisation, skimmed over the vaccine denial. Lord knows how he thinks either one will be confirmed.
Maybe Trump just wants to stay entertained until inauguration day by watching the increasingly hysterical reactions on MSNBC and The View - it's been quite something!