I wanted to reiterate that my reason for avoiding Halal is NOT because of animal welfare.
I explained my understanding of the slaughter comparison, to really illustrate why some people may feel that non-halal is ‘kinder’.
I have seen plenty of shorts on twitter, of animals being slaughtered in the halal way, and it really doesn’t look that quick or humane. However, I wouldn’t presume to tell you that you should agree.
Perhaps the view of stunning is ignorant, and something we tell ourselves is better, as the animal is unconscious when the inevitable happens, but it can appear that way to people who have grown up in a western society that has told us this is ethical.
Therefore, I personally don’t think it’s a bizarre reason for not eating halal. I think it’s a perfectly reasonable reason, even if the person is mistaken in their overall view of slaughter. It’s their reason and as valid as your reason for eating halal.
My actual reason for not eating halal, is that as a Roman Catholic, I feel uncomfortable eating food prepared in accordance to another religions guidelines. I understand that there is nothing that tells me I shouldn’t eat it, but it feels wrong. So similarly to yourself, I have deep rooted beliefs that determine my choice.
I have consistently stated however that I believe that we should all be catered for equally.
What I find distasteful is the ignorant suggestion that anyone who doesn’t eat halal is using an excuse to disguise Islamophobia or racism. And that’s how these threads tend to go…with people who don’t care what they eat (fair enough, their decision) virtue signalling and calling others racist. It’s quite disgusting and intolerant when you think about it.