Madeleine McCann new evidence - BREAKING NEWS

[PrettyFlyforaMaiTai]

A Senior German detective has told a court that investigators had found emails on a Hotmail account used by Christian Brueckner that linked him directly to the Madeleine McCann case.

However, the detective was unable to share details of the evidence as it was 'related to the killing' of Madeleine. Brueckner, the prime suspect, is currently on trial in Germany for unrelated sex crimes.

You know what is really weird about this case and this forum, nobody in 17 years or 2520000 threads and not even on this 24 page thread has ever wondered if the McCanns were negligent. So so strange.

Also, I can think of at least one other well known case where the young child was left unattended in an open area, yet no one goes on and on, year after year about that. There is only sympathy for the family, as there should be.

Wait, there were other kids the world over that were left unattended and were taken? I mean have we just abandoned bonfires and pitchforks? Are we now really leaving everything to the 'law' to deal with? What the world is coming to I will never know.

I might have to go upstairs now and remove the kids cotton wool bedding and bubble wrap duvets.

I've never seen that expression. And advanced search of "ego kibble or kibbles" brought up around 180 posts containing that expression after which the results were for kibble or ego on their own.

It means narcissistic supply.

No because that's not the only possibility. She could've just wandered out of the apartment herself and got lost/had an accident etc. somewhere she was not able to be found. Just one alternative to abduction.

Actually, leaving 3 children under the age of 4 in an apartment, in a foreign country, with the door unlocked, not just once, but repeatedly - * *is pretty odd behaviour in itself. Especially for a well to do, upper middle class couple who could well afford to hire an au pair to accompany them on holiday.

Just wondering what’s different about the McCanns that everyone keeps on and on about it in their case but not others. If anything, their class draws more criticism, not less.

Compare their behaviour with the parents of James Bulger, Sarah Payne, Ben Needham, Lee Boxell, Suzy Lamplugh to name just a few.

😂I do hope this is sarcasm; if I lose or can't find my pencil tomorrow, this is evidence it has been abducted. If I say I can't find my pencil even though I might know exactly where it is, is that also evidence of it having been abducted.

I personally have never seen her look haunted but obviously this is subjective. Stressed perhaps. Their wording is atypical, but then people will say they are doctors, him being a surgeon and her training as an anaesthetist...

they may have a different manner.

well I really want to know if the pyjamas were abducted? Any anyone who does not get the reference can feck right off.

Did the other couple of with then aksing leave dc? I thought there was a rota set up to check including them?

One person was ill and stayed in and didn't check any children. Another person claimed they listened at the door at their turn to check all the children left alone, the rest went to dinner. Madeline has not been verified as having been seen that day at all at anytime, by anyone independent from that group. Which is fine, it may be that close a group on holiday.

What about the sniffer dogs? and the nightwear job by Martin Roberts at the very least to open a discussion on who or why she was 'abducted'.

Ok so the maccans dc were the only dc on the trip.

The sniffer dogs are not evidence. They are unreliable, despite claims to the contrary by McCann haters. Detections by sniffer dogs are not admissible in any court in Europe - something which some McCann haters refused to accept when I posted this a few years ago but which was, and remains, true. At best, a detection by a sniffer dog gives an indication that can be investigated by forensic scientists to see if it produces any evidence. In this case, no forensic evidence was found as a result of the alleged detections by the dogs.

Those who continue to claim that the dogs were 100% reliable ignore the fact that at least one of the dogs involved in this case reacted positively in locations in Haut de la Garenne in Jersey. These indications were subsequently found to be false.

As for Martin Roberts and his theory about the pyjamas, that is complete rubbish. There is a decent fisking of his article at Random Moments of Utter Stupidity: March 2016.

I've no idea why he hasn't been sued into oblivion
If you mean the Deception Detective, he has said many times that he's prepared for the McCanns to sue him. Which they haven't, to date, because a) he is purportedly an attorney himself, and b) IMHO his conclusions are far too close to the truth, so it would be unwise for the McCanns to put themselves under scrutiny again.
The Deception Detective, Sonia Poulton, Richard D. Hall and Peter Hyatt, to name but a few, are only trying to get to the truth.

'In this case, no forensic evidence was found as a result of the alleged detections by the dogs.'

... because the items were removed from the scene.

You actually have not read the original article, have you? Beyond all of that, not one person has yet to come on this thread and provide evidence for abduction ... staggering odds, not a single piece of evidence. Not a shred. Go on, I'll give you a few hours to google and come up with something.

sorry forgot to tag you @prh47bridge

actually, going to leave it here, because the thread is just going to be taken down and any bit of truth or ripping the fabric of the media reporting is a good thing. Nobody has been able to answer my question, as I expected. Anyone of a decent IQ knows what happened anyway, not a mystery.

Yes, I have read the original article and all the excuses by those who claim the dogs are 100% reliable or that there is other evidence against the McCanns. There is no credible evidence that this was anything other than an abduction. I don't need a few hours to Google. Just a simple look at the actual facts, as opposed to the many made up facts peddled by McCann haters such as yourself.

again and again, where is the abduction evidence? you still can't answer can you.

over and over and over.

624 messages and not a single one suggesting why abduction is the way to go, bar the comment she is missing, hence abduction. The truth always comes out, it always falls out eventually like a big ball of pus.