Madeleine McCann new evidence - BREAKING NEWS

[PrettyFlyforaMaiTai]

A Senior German detective has told a court that investigators had found emails on a Hotmail account used by Christian Brueckner that linked him directly to the Madeleine McCann case.

However, the detective was unable to share details of the evidence as it was 'related to the killing' of Madeleine. Brueckner, the prime suspect, is currently on trial in Germany for unrelated sex crimes.

It was the fault of the person who abducted her

Is this the book that claims she died the day before, on 2nd May? If so, does it address what reasons were given for why nobody saw her all day on 3rd, because apparently photos were taken and she went to kids club that day?

There was that young child abducted from the bathroom of her house in Tyneside, and poor Nora Quoirin - older, but we can't be sure that she wandered off of her own volition.

Would that have made you feel better?

What would them being charged with neglect have changed?

Obviously the rest of their party would be similarly charged?

Yes @MoonKiss this one....I've not read it so don't know what the content is...it's just been released a couple of weeks ago.

It really wasn't in my circles.

If he did do it why would he put it in writing though ? Who was he talking to ? I listen to TCRS and he thinks it wasn’t him as there was no evidence.This seems a bit too convenient.

Only on Mumsnet do you get phrases like ' Those poor parents ' and that they have ' suffered enough'.

I find it absolutely fascinating.

On the other forums I frequent the McCanns are roundly lambasted for their awful parenting, not to mention the other aspects of the case that leave questions unanswered.

Is it true that it's because Kate is a close friend of the Mumsnet owners?

I guess this post will probably be deleted.

”Is it true that it's because Kate is a close friend of the Mumsnet owners?”

No it’s obviously because this is a site chock full of parents with young children. Most here can empathise with the horror that would be a missing or dead child.

Yes l agree,l was a child of the 60s and we went on Butlins holidays where they had people walking or cycling up and down the rows of chalets listening for babies/children crying. They called it the Baby Listening service or some such. Your parents basically gave their chalet no.in at reception along with which bar/ballroom/whatever they were going to be in and if a child was heard crying they called chalet no. out over tannoy. Nobody batted an eyelid.

No, it's because it is not very interesting to lambast the same people for 20 odd years. Yes, they were neglectful.

But reading the OP, I still don't think Brueckner will be brought to justice on this, as they have been trying for years to pin it on him.

Not to mention the very experienced police chief on the case being so sure of their involvement that he lost his career, home, had his assets frozen in writing a book about the case and was unsuccessfully sued all the way up to the ECHR.

Imagine thinking that occupation and the ability to hire a PR firm must be the reasons why a forum full of mothers would throw up people who know better than to have any respect for Goncarlo Amaral.

There's a very very interesting interview concerning this case on YouTube where Richard Hall talks to the statement analyst Peter Hyatt. It's called Embedded Confessions.

Yes l agree,l was a child of the 60s and we went on Butlins holidays where they had people walking or cycling up and down the rows of chalets listening for babies/children crying. They called it the Baby Listening service or some such. Your parents basically gave their chalet no.in at reception along with which bar/ballroom/whatever they were going to be in and if a child was heard crying they called chalet no. out over tannoy. Nobody batted an eyelid.

I’m going to have a look at this now. Thanks.

Just be aware that for every “expert” video saying the parents did it, there is another equally compelling one saying they didn’t.

Confirmation bias is real.

I always think the way class has been applied to the McCanns is very interesting. Because they're not posh at all, really. Hence the accents. They're from pretty humble backgrounds in Huyton and Glasgow, and socially climbed. Nothing about them really gives posh. What they actually are is high income professionals. They're not Karen Matthews, obviously, but who knows how different it might've all looked if they'd been actually posh?

Incorrect. This is not concrete. There are no independent witnesses to verify that Madeline was in that room that night. Was she? wasn't she? Nothing is 100% ever.

You can’t tell people not to have an opinion on your opinion either. In my opinion your opinion about it is childish and driven by faux outrage ito enable you to further criticise Kate McCann by fixating on one word in her autobiography. The dates on which the McCanns have threatened legal action are relevant to accusations that they are still doing it to this day - where is your actual evidence? Do you think the McCanns lawyers are reading this thread and instructing Mumsnet to remove various posts? You’re having a laugh surely…

Ime the amount of time people spend lambasting the McCanns is obversely indexed to the number of brain cells.

Absolute rubbish “only on Mumsnet” - you’ll be accusing those who sympathise with them of being paid shills next.

My DD is also the same age as Madeline. Wouldn’t have dreamed of leaving her sleeping whilst I ate in a restaurant a few 100 yards up the road.

I understand. For my own part, back when I supported the Mccanns, I did buy and read this book.

WRT that specific quote, when people question it I took it to mean that if your child was likely to have been taken by a pedophile and you did not know what had become of them, it would be very hard to say those words unless you knew that’s not what happened to your child.

Over time, I have come to be more dubious about some of the things which just don’t add up. It’s not a conspiracy theory - it’s based on what people who work for the police and criminal profilers have said after they were asked to look at the case.

No doubt CB is a wrongun but I don't think it's him, they've have been trying to pin it on him for a number of years...