@Isit7yet Thank you for posting, your input is appreciated. I preface this with apologies to decent assessors, that inevitably it's the bad ones that get talked about most. I work, and claim PIP to allow it. I'm multiply disabled and find working while obviously disabled seems to raise suspicions.
IME as someone in a wheelchair, is you can be treated by the assessor as perfectly capable of walking if you wanted to. It's really hard to deal with.
The same is true of living with the effects of unstable Crohns, and having an indwelling catheter.
DWP had all my medical evidence showing functional difficulties and why, but one assessor opened their computer and informed me my disability was MH, then wanted to focus the majority of the interview on MH issues I don't have!
I'm multiply disabled but only physically. "No" and "this doesn't apply to me," should allow us to move on to relevant questions, not run us out of time.
That indwelling catheterization was a necessity decided on by the hospital, wasn't enough for one assessor, he needed to understand the exact reasons why? when this would end? and why wasn't I seeing someone to speed up ending it? The implication all the way through was it wasn't needed, and it was humiliating.
For me there's no end, and nothing improvable, but he insisted I was incorrect.
He also told me that I categorically didn't have a frequently frozen shoulder and my GP was wrong, and therefore he was believed I could lift both arms above my head and behind my back at all times.
So there's now an MRI scan on my file showing adhesive shoulder capsulitis and how bad the build up of scar tissue is, why they can't operate, and an explanation of exactly why I'm indwelling catheter dependent for life.
Why did the medication I was on not control and stop the effects of Crohns?
I upset the assessor by saying it was a conversation to be had with my gastro team. He demanded I explain while making it clear he entirely disbelieved me.
So now there's a letter in my medical evidence from a senior consultant explaining reality of treatment of Chrons for some even with Biologic treatment.
Being able to say please read medical evidence page X, gives the right to refuse to answer every assertion, or the 'nudge attempts' that effects must be lesser than stated, or easily fixable by the claimant, without giving the assessor the right to say they found no evidence of a need.
I appreciate not all assessors do this, but the long-term impact of those that do on disabled people, is huge.
At this point I have incontrovertible proof of all the whys, and have been given a long term award. I should be happy and relaxed, but I'm just waiting for the next blindside.