Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What happened in the House of Commons tonight?

1000 replies

Bookridden · 21/02/2024 21:19

I'm struggling to understand what is going on and would be grateful is someone can explain to me in simple terms.

Why were Labour worried about the safety of MPs?

Why were the SNP unhappy?

Why were the Tories unhappy?

What's likely to happen next?

Are MPs who don't take a Pro-Palestinian stance really putting their lives at risk?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
PerkingFaintly · 24/02/2024 15:15

And in fact their economic incompetence goes back to George Osborne – the man who turned a short recession (experienced by many countries after the bank crashes), into a longer one with his much-vaunted Austerity.

It's not a flash in the pan thing. This is what Conservatives do right now.

PerkingFaintly · 24/02/2024 15:17

It comes back to what we've said before, possibly even on this thread, that the gutting of the senior Tory party by Johnson to leave only pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson loyalists has been very, very bad for the UK.

[edited for spelling; never can remember which way that bloke's name is spelt]

Newchapterbeckons · 24/02/2024 15:19

PerkingFaintly · 24/02/2024 15:17

It comes back to what we've said before, possibly even on this thread, that the gutting of the senior Tory party by Johnson to leave only pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson loyalists has been very, very bad for the UK.

[edited for spelling; never can remember which way that bloke's name is spelt]

Edited

Only bad for remainers! For the 17.5 million that voted for Brexit it is fine thanks.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

IClaudine · 24/02/2024 15:20

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 15:07

Of course it’s not like Brexit.

The rules on voting in the Brexit referendum weren’t violated by polling officers.

Can you point me to the rules which were violated by polling officers, please? Because I don't think any were.

noblegiraffe · 24/02/2024 15:23

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 15:05

She dashed for tax cuts, brought down a turbulent market response, retreated and was forced out. Because her party realised that she was no longer ‘sellable’. Because the Tories value economic reputation.

That doesn’t equal or even get close to ‘trashing’ the economy.

I see, so we're quibbling over the definition of trashing the economy.

The value of the pound plummeting, mortgage rates shooting up and the Bank of England having to intervene with billions to save pension funds meets my threshold.

And the fact that she got forced out and her plans which caused that put in the bin suggests that others agreed that she was, indeed, trashing the economy.

You, of course, are entitled to your own view.

cardibach · 24/02/2024 15:24

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 10:31

The YouGov survey is not evidence of anything. The topic wasn’t listed

I don’t think it’s been shown it wasn’t listed. The poster you’re referring to says she doesn’t know whether it was.

PerkingFaintly · 24/02/2024 15:26

Came across a clip of David Cameron, back when he was Prime Minister or just before, saying approx: "Conservative Party: does what it says on the tin."

Gave me a wry laugh, at least.

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 15:28

cardibach · 24/02/2024 15:24

I don’t think it’s been shown it wasn’t listed. The poster you’re referring to says she doesn’t know whether it was.

Click on the link. It’s not included as an option.

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 15:36

For all the ‘no one cares’ pro male posters and Isla Bryson was nothing there has been more movement in gender ideology than say, Brexit, politically

Labour are spinning on it but they realised how bad Self ID sounded after Bryson and attempted to paper over their issues to avoid challenge

For all the polls and posts on here no major party is going into the GE with a shift on Brexit

Women have changed the conversation more than that

No thanks to the few on here who don’t care obviously

cardibach · 24/02/2024 15:37

IClaudine · 24/02/2024 13:33

What’s really interesting there is if you assume every single ‘don’t know’ breaks for the Tories, they still don’t get past equal in any of the groups other than outright owners.
I’m in outright owning Labour voter, for clarity.

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 15:42

noblegiraffe · 24/02/2024 15:23

I see, so we're quibbling over the definition of trashing the economy.

The value of the pound plummeting, mortgage rates shooting up and the Bank of England having to intervene with billions to save pension funds meets my threshold.

And the fact that she got forced out and her plans which caused that put in the bin suggests that others agreed that she was, indeed, trashing the economy.

You, of course, are entitled to your own view.

Thank you for that most gracious concession that I may hold my own view.

My definition of ‘trashing’ an entire economy does not extend to bad judgement that was reversed without harm, no.

I don’t think that’s ’trashing’ any more than Nick Clegg’s backtracked agreement to no increase in student loans ‘trashed’ education or the Libs’ reputation in education. (Personally, I don’t think he should have made that humiliating mea culpa video, but now he’s raking it in with Facebook I doubt he cares).

cardibach · 24/02/2024 15:44

IClaudine · 24/02/2024 14:17

I live in Wales, having lived in England for 35 years. I find things fine here on a day to day basis, although obviously lack of funding is a serious issue. I have never regretted moving here.

Transport is not as good as where I used to live, but most places don't have transport as good as Labour-run London.

Exactly. Tories really like to make it sound like Wales is a total shit show. Reality is, it’s pretty good. The train strike was settled here quickly. As was the teachers’ strike. Public transport isn’t great, but it doesn’t seem to get any better when you cross the border.

IClaudine · 24/02/2024 15:44

cardibach · 24/02/2024 15:37

What’s really interesting there is if you assume every single ‘don’t know’ breaks for the Tories, they still don’t get past equal in any of the groups other than outright owners.
I’m in outright owning Labour voter, for clarity.

Same here.

Notwithstanding the don't knows it is also interesting how close the outright owners votes are, given that they are more likely to be older. I have seen other stats that indicate that the Tories are losing their over 65s core vote. Whether to Reform UK or Labour, who knows.

BIossomtoes · 24/02/2024 15:48

I’m in outright owning Labour voter, for clarity.

Same.

noblegiraffe · 24/02/2024 15:53

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 15:42

Thank you for that most gracious concession that I may hold my own view.

My definition of ‘trashing’ an entire economy does not extend to bad judgement that was reversed without harm, no.

I don’t think that’s ’trashing’ any more than Nick Clegg’s backtracked agreement to no increase in student loans ‘trashed’ education or the Libs’ reputation in education. (Personally, I don’t think he should have made that humiliating mea culpa video, but now he’s raking it in with Facebook I doubt he cares).

bad judgement that was reversed without harm

Definitions of 'without harm' seem to vary too...

Ah mate, you're still trying with the Lib Dems? Bad news for you there, I'm afraid.

cardibach · 24/02/2024 15:54

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 15:28

Click on the link. It’s not included as an option.

‘None of these’ is though. And it barely scores. If people genuinely felt women’s rights or trans rights were more important, they’d have selected that, surely?

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 15:58

cardibach · 24/02/2024 15:54

‘None of these’ is though. And it barely scores. If people genuinely felt women’s rights or trans rights were more important, they’d have selected that, surely?

Yeh that’s not convincing

If it were Labour wouldn’t want to learn from Scotland’s mistakes

It’s just the unbelievably blinkered on here who think it hasn’t had an impact and argue no one cares. What an own goal to be so anti women btw

It’s had more of an impact than the endless we hate Brexit posts and polls. No party has picked that up for the GE

PerkingFaintly · 24/02/2024 16:01

noblegiraffe · 24/02/2024 15:53

bad judgement that was reversed without harm

Definitions of 'without harm' seem to vary too...

Ah mate, you're still trying with the Lib Dems? Bad news for you there, I'm afraid.

"without harm"

Thanks @WhatsTheUseOfWorrying for demonstrating my point that you're glossing over the known damage caused by Truss's Travesty – as well as adopting the most optimistic possible view of the unknowns.

Why would you do that?

LittleBowSheep · 24/02/2024 16:01

justasking111 · 24/02/2024 14:10

Wales, we booted out the following and nationalised it

Trains we booted out virgin because they were more expensive took control. After Chester it's a shit show

Arriva bus service we nationalised bought it up. They're cancelling buses left and right.

Cardiff airport failed so we bought it, they've cancelled destinations left and right

Caernarfon airport, we bought it failed.

Steel , we've propped up for years the Indians are laughing.

Tree planting another failure.

NHS OH joy we came out of special measures and went back in post covid.

We spent 4.5 million on a farm to hold green man then a pair of ospreys nested so we can't hold green man.

There are more fuck ups Which seriously affect tourism. 20 mph on most roads. Tourism tax looming.

Be glad you live in England

Seriously, if you think things are any better in England then I'm afraid you are very much mistaken.

It seems I live within the same geographical area as you with the health authority that is back in special measures. Over the last 4 years I have had countless dealings with NHS in both Wales and England. I was diagnosed with a very rare condition which was identified by my local GP and then diagnosed by the specialist department at my local hospital. Both were excellent and dealt with it extremely quickly (despite the fact the whole process started just a month before the pandemic started).

Because of the rarity of my illness I then had to be referred to a specialist hospital for surgery as only a handful in the UK deal with it. I was offered Cardiff or one in Manchester. I chose the one in Manchester because it is nearer to me and quicker to get to. Big mistake. Since day 1 at this English hospital I have had nothing but problems with them. I could write pages about the issues I have had with them, the list is endless. I am now post-surgery and have been referred back to the consultant at my local hospital in Wales and my treatment and management once again is superb.

I have friends in many parts of England and they constantly tell me how they can't get a GP appointment for days or weeks on end and yet I haven't had this problem at all. The times I have had to travel to the hospital in England on public transport has been filled with setbacks. I would guess I have done the journey 20-25 times over the last 3 years and only once in all that time was there a train cancelled in Wales. About a third of my journeys in England were either met with delays or cancellations. In fact, maybe even more than that.

I'm not saying Wales is perfect and I don't agree with everything that Drakeford has done (I'm not a Labour supporter btw) but I do think he's been a damn sight better than the conveyor belt of Tory PMs over the last few years.

I have lived in Wales and I have lived in England and to me, there is no contest on where I'd rather be. You have choices but I think you would be very blinkered to think that the grass is greener over the border.

PerkingFaintly · 24/02/2024 16:06

That’s your evidence for the Tories trashing the economy?

Also, THAT'S NOT A CHALLENGE TO CREATE MORE.

(Just felt I should spell that out, given recent Tory cabinet members' tendency to say, "Hold my beer...")

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 16:12

noblegiraffe · 24/02/2024 15:53

bad judgement that was reversed without harm

Definitions of 'without harm' seem to vary too...

Ah mate, you're still trying with the Lib Dems? Bad news for you there, I'm afraid.

Well, since the Full Fact analysis that a pp linked to could not determine that any financial harm was caused, I’d say that my view was well within a reasonable range of conclusions.

What Truss’s mistake plainly didn’t do was wreck the economy, on any measure.

Not a LibDem? How fascinating. That’s a three pipe problem. You write about English schooling, so not Plaid or the SNP. And I think we’re eye-to-eye on the present Israel issue, so you’re not a Galloway-ite. Hmmm.

You’re not a Tankie are you? Or a Cornish nationalist?

cardibach · 24/02/2024 16:15

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 15:58

Yeh that’s not convincing

If it were Labour wouldn’t want to learn from Scotland’s mistakes

It’s just the unbelievably blinkered on here who think it hasn’t had an impact and argue no one cares. What an own goal to be so anti women btw

It’s had more of an impact than the endless we hate Brexit posts and polls. No party has picked that up for the GE

Only not convincing because you have decided the majority of women will make it a vote affecting issue. What would you have ticked in that survey?
Who is anti women by the way? As other posters have pointed out, there are lots of ways to be pro women and lots of reasons to think there are issues in play at this election not based on sex which will have a massively detrimental effect on women if handled incorrectly.
And nobody has picked up Brexit because it’s pointless to. It’s done. It can’t be undone in one term. And nobody wants to let Tories lie endlessly about it at another election. Not even Tories, it seems.

PerkingFaintly · 24/02/2024 16:19

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 16:12

Well, since the Full Fact analysis that a pp linked to could not determine that any financial harm was caused, I’d say that my view was well within a reasonable range of conclusions.

What Truss’s mistake plainly didn’t do was wreck the economy, on any measure.

Not a LibDem? How fascinating. That’s a three pipe problem. You write about English schooling, so not Plaid or the SNP. And I think we’re eye-to-eye on the present Israel issue, so you’re not a Galloway-ite. Hmmm.

You’re not a Tankie are you? Or a Cornish nationalist?

WTF?

The Full Fact analysis did determine some financial harm had been caused!

It could quantify an impact on the Treasury's bottom line.

What it couldn't do is quantify the impact on the economy. Some people argue that Truss's Travesty had a very large impact and lasting damage; others argue that markets and policy were (in Feb) the what they would have been without Truss.

PerkingFaintly · 24/02/2024 16:19

@WhatsTheUseOfWorrying , you're not a very reliable reporter, are you?

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 16:19

cardibach · 24/02/2024 16:15

Only not convincing because you have decided the majority of women will make it a vote affecting issue. What would you have ticked in that survey?
Who is anti women by the way? As other posters have pointed out, there are lots of ways to be pro women and lots of reasons to think there are issues in play at this election not based on sex which will have a massively detrimental effect on women if handled incorrectly.
And nobody has picked up Brexit because it’s pointless to. It’s done. It can’t be undone in one term. And nobody wants to let Tories lie endlessly about it at another election. Not even Tories, it seems.

Edited

If it didn’t matter Starmer would not have changed tack, or span it a bit so it looked to be the case.

Women are having an impact, some to great personal cost. Die hard Labour voters contribute ‘no one cares’ as many times as they can

Thank fuck not everyone is like that we’d still be in full and proud Self ID land

All gratitude to women who speak up.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.