Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What happened in the House of Commons tonight?

1000 replies

Bookridden · 21/02/2024 21:19

I'm struggling to understand what is going on and would be grateful is someone can explain to me in simple terms.

Why were Labour worried about the safety of MPs?

Why were the SNP unhappy?

Why were the Tories unhappy?

What's likely to happen next?

Are MPs who don't take a Pro-Palestinian stance really putting their lives at risk?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 12:46

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 12:32

Mortgage rates increased after the -proposed - mini budget because the lenders feared the inflationary pressure - the sort you’d get from increased public spending. But they fell back quickly because there was no mini-budget.

Interest rates gradually increased afterwards in line with expectations that pre-dated Truss.

Part of the inflationary worry and higher mortgage rates was lower tax but higher spending through the energy price guarantee. The guarantee did happen. Were you opposed to that?

I don’t disagree that Truss was foolish. But the (successful) Labour attack on the Tories trashing the economy is dishonest.

As is the falsehood about £37bn wasted on the covid app:

https://fullfact.org/health/Covid-NHS-app-test-and-trace/

The fraud by the government, not on the government, on covid procurement is another whopper.

As is the ‘Shapps insisted on ULEZ expansion’.

I accept that politics is a dirty business. But mass campaigns of lies about opponents don’t improve anything for anyone.

Good factual post @WhatsTheUseOfWorrying

BIossomtoes · 24/02/2024 12:57

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 12:37

If ‘no one cares’ as a few posters try to claim Isla Bryson would not have caused the backlash it did

A reaction to a specific scandal is no indication of public opinion on a principle. There’s some real barrel scraping happening now.

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 13:01

BIossomtoes · 24/02/2024 12:57

A reaction to a specific scandal is no indication of public opinion on a principle. There’s some real barrel scraping happening now.

No at all and obviously you are holding onto a survey that supplies zero evidence for your entrenched pro male views.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

BIossomtoes · 24/02/2024 13:08

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 13:01

No at all and obviously you are holding onto a survey that supplies zero evidence for your entrenched pro male views.

Edited

That survey indicates that there’s so little concern about the trans issue that it didn’t make the list. My views are far from pro men @EasternStandard. I was a feminist when you were in nappies. Are you really so entrenched in your views that you can’t tolerate any disagreement?

PerkingFaintly · 24/02/2024 13:08

Last I heard, Michelle Mone's company was still under investigation by the National Crime Agency, and she herself was still under investigation by the Lords.

So, not yet found to be anything.

And indeed, to be fair, she is a Tory peer, not a Tory minister.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67748301

Michelle Mone

Michelle Mone hits back at Rishi Sunak over PPE scandal

The peer says she was "honest" with the government over contracts for personal protective equipment.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67748301

Notonthestairs · 24/02/2024 13:11

I thought the High Court found the VIP lane to have been in breach of the obligation of equal treatment and therefore illegal.

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 13:13

Posters are forgetting Labour reacted to Isla Bryson by shifting on the issue, superficially at least in an attempt to avoid similar

That spin was due to wanting ‘to avoid the "mistakes" made by the Scottish government’ as quoted

That backlash worked, from women who cared tf

PerkingFaintly · 24/02/2024 13:13

BTW, if I'm out-of-date with that about Mone, please do update me. I may have missed something.

IClaudine · 24/02/2024 13:23

Someone earlier was talking about the polls being wrong. Have the polls been consistently wrong for over two years now? Current poll overlaps slightly with the speaker controversy and seems to have done Labour no harm so far and Rochdale doesn't seem to have done any real damage:

https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/48724-voting-intention-con-20-lab-46-20-21-feb-2024

YouGov add an interesting footnote:

All polls are subject to a wide range of potential sources of error. On the basis of the historical record of the polls at recent general elections, there is a 9 in 10 chance that the true value of a party’s support lies within 4 points of the estimates provided by this poll, and a 2 in 3 chance that they lie within 2 points.

Voting Intention: Con 20%, Lab 46% (20-21 Feb 2024) | YouGov

Latest YouGov Westminster voting intention figures

https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/48724-voting-intention-con-20-lab-46-20-21-feb-2024

noblegiraffe · 24/02/2024 13:24

Mortgage rates increased after the -proposed - mini budget because the lenders feared the inflationary pressure - the sort you’d get from increased public spending. But they fell back quickly because there was no mini-budget.

So your argument is that Truss was going to trash the economy but wasn't allowed to because it was obvious that she was trashing the economy and was therefore forced to resign when the pound went into free-fall, mortgage rates soared and the Bank of England was forced into a £65billion bailout of pensions, so we're still all good for Tory fiscal responsibility? Bearing in mind that the Tories made her PM because of her promised tax cuts that caused all the chaos and are therefore also responsible for what happened?

That's what you're saying?

MushMonster · 24/02/2024 13:25

Crikeyalmighty · 24/02/2024 11:39

I didn't see all this fuss for Johnson proroguing Parliament and lying to the Queen- because he knew a vote wouldn't go his way- that to me was way more serious

Yes, that is a moment to remember. How he used protocol to favour himself, involving the Queen in it.

noblegiraffe · 24/02/2024 13:25

Someone earlier was talking about the polls being wrong.

I expect those by-elections are also wrong.

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 13:29

Notonthestairs · 24/02/2024 13:11

I thought the High Court found the VIP lane to have been in breach of the obligation of equal treatment and therefore illegal.

No, not the VIP lane: one contract decision. So tiny a breach that the court refused to make a declaration of unlawfulness. That is the sum total of the ‘low hanging fruit’ challenges brought.

What an appalling waste of public money for the courts - inc. the Court of Appeal - to have to sit and decide these misconceived and political cases. As far as I recall, the GLP had now abandoned cases against the government because it has been told by the courts that it had no standing to bring them. Yup, politicised ‘lawfare’ that has wasted public money.

Funny, though, I never hear the GLP apologising for wasting public money.

IClaudine · 24/02/2024 13:30

No doubt they will declare Labour are finished when "gorgeous" (yuk) George wins Rochdale.

BIossomtoes · 24/02/2024 13:31

I’ve never heard the Tories apologise for wasting public money either, despite it running into billions and denuding public services of funding. Funny that.

EasternStandard · 24/02/2024 13:31

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 13:29

No, not the VIP lane: one contract decision. So tiny a breach that the court refused to make a declaration of unlawfulness. That is the sum total of the ‘low hanging fruit’ challenges brought.

What an appalling waste of public money for the courts - inc. the Court of Appeal - to have to sit and decide these misconceived and political cases. As far as I recall, the GLP had now abandoned cases against the government because it has been told by the courts that it had no standing to bring them. Yup, politicised ‘lawfare’ that has wasted public money.

Funny, though, I never hear the GLP apologising for wasting public money.

What an appalling waste of public money for the courts - inc. the Court of Appeal - to have to sit and decide these misconceived and political cases
Agree

As far as I recall, the GLP had now abandoned cases against the government because it has been told by the courts that it had no standing to bring them.
Good

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 13:35

noblegiraffe · 24/02/2024 13:24

Mortgage rates increased after the -proposed - mini budget because the lenders feared the inflationary pressure - the sort you’d get from increased public spending. But they fell back quickly because there was no mini-budget.

So your argument is that Truss was going to trash the economy but wasn't allowed to because it was obvious that she was trashing the economy and was therefore forced to resign when the pound went into free-fall, mortgage rates soared and the Bank of England was forced into a £65billion bailout of pensions, so we're still all good for Tory fiscal responsibility? Bearing in mind that the Tories made her PM because of her promised tax cuts that caused all the chaos and are therefore also responsible for what happened?

That's what you're saying?

Er, no. I’m saying she was foolish to have not foreseen the market reaction. But having abandoned it, and resigned, she did not trash the economy.

By the way, the Treasury didn’t spend £65bn. It waded in to the gilt market to support government debt after the pensions industry made reckless moves to sell. The Treasury made £3.5bn profit on those gilts.

Are you Labour’s economic advisor?

noblegiraffe · 24/02/2024 13:36

Crikey, you and I seem to have different ideas of trashing the economy.

You seem to think that if the economy-trashing is fixed and the PM resigns over it, we're all good.

noblegiraffe · 24/02/2024 13:37

Liz Truss was a Tory PM, she sent the country into economic meltdown and was forced to resign after a humiliating 45 days but you don't think this says anything about the Tory's record on fiscal responsibility?

Mad.

Notonthestairs · 24/02/2024 13:39

Thank you for responding. I don't follow the Good Law Project and had to look up who you were referring to.

WhatsTheUseOfWorrying · 24/02/2024 13:41

BIossomtoes · 24/02/2024 13:31

I’ve never heard the Tories apologise for wasting public money either, despite it running into billions and denuding public services of funding. Funny that.

I’ve never heard Labour apologise for wasting hundreds of billions during Blair’s and Brown’s terms.

If PFI wasn’t a Labour fuck up (yes, yes, started under the Tories, but eagerly expanded massively by Brown) that needs apologising for, why should anyone apologise for any waste ever?

Let’s be real about this.

justasking111 · 24/02/2024 13:42

Whoever gets in take note the economy is taking a dive.

Women,
Trans
Disabled,
Children.
The sick

We're all stuffed. I reckon seven years minimum. Labour has observed the shit show in Wales and dialled back the eco obsession with cars, farming, because we can't afford it just now.

DuncinToffee · 24/02/2024 13:46

Yes, we can all agree that 14 years of Tory mess will take time to clean up.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread