For a man who doesn't know what a woman is he's remarkably cunning.....
No I don't think so. Like I said upthread, I think both the SNP and Conservatives were motivated by a Labour rebellion. SNP were very close to Labour's position and could have updated their motion and Labour would have backed it. They didn't.
Labour MPs would have therefore to rebel to vote for the SNP amendment which is damaging for Starmer. If they didn't rebel then the motion would fall, no ceasefire, not what Labour want and also very damaging for lots of MPs who's constituents are pressuring them. So voting for the SNP amendment first was a trap for Labour.
Hoyle sprung that trap by putting Labour amendment first. The SNP wouldn't vote against that because its condoning Hamas. So then the Labour amendment passes and Conservatives either vote with Labour or look isolated by not calling for a ceasefire.
So the Conservatives have spat the dummy and flounced to avoid embarrassment. With a bit of lying thrown in, plus ca change