That guardian article makes for interesting reading.
And I stand by what I said. Far too much of a coincidence that other anonymous allegations were allegedly made to the sun after their initial allegation was shot down by the person they were claiming to be at the heart of it. A person who, according to their lawyer, is estranged from the people making the allegations.
There is absolutely 0 proof that any of this ever happened. None what so ever, and even the Sun are doing a hasty backtrack.
But it doesn’t matter whether there’s proof now, people have already branded Hugh Edwards a pervert. We don’t actually know whether that is true. It seems evidence is no longer required, all someone has to do is say “x did y” and it clearly must be true.
Jeremy Vine has publicly spoken out about being named as the individual, clearly he was robust enough to do it. Perhaps Hugh Edwards’ response to being named is to have a breakdown, because it doesn’t matter now whether it was true or. Not, it was in the Sun and on Twitter, a place where even the biggest amount of bullshit is upheld as truth, and that’s all that matters.
If it’s found to be true then fair enough, but if it isn’t it doesn’t matter, because people will always believe that it is.
And in the meantime someone is in hospital with serious mental health issues, but apparently that doesn’t matter either.