I don’t think so.
I challenged a poster who said:
“Alice has told the girls repeatedly that she will kill herself if they leave her…it has been documented by those who were there / heard it. And as stated by the girls”
You even admit yourself that that is not accurate because you now suggest that Alice implied (not stated) that if she lost custody of the girls, she would kill herself and as the girls read her social media they would have come to the same conclusion.
But that’s not the same as her telling her children repeatedly that she will kill herself if they leave her. And it certainly wasn’t documented by the people who were there and heard it, since nothing was said by her to hear.
I dislike the narrative of other posters that if Alice didn’t specifically say ‘I’m going to kill myself’ that it isn’t what she meant.
I’m not pushing a narrative. A poster said that she actually said that to her kids, which she didn’t.
Alice may be many things, but let’s not lie about things she has not done in order to demonise her further.
And whilst arguing in front of children isn’t ideal, it’s not exactly child abuse either.
You called me a child abuse apologist for challenging a blatant lie, and for calling an argument exactly what it was - an argument.
Your viewpoint is exactly that, your viewpoint. It doesn’t make you right, nor does it make others child abuse apologists.