Putinβs approval rating has risen, as is common with any war leader, even ones that may be losing. We had Gen. Cavoli of EURCOM say this month that while the ground forces are eroded, Russia is still a multi-domain threat to be reckoned with. I recall during the opening weeks of the war when things started to unravel for Russia and the VKS proved they couldnβt do SEAD for shit, having to tell people that this wasnβt a fault of Soviet/Russian hardware. First of all, Ukraine, the winning side at that point, was using the same or inferior variants. Secondly, the doctrine of the USSR didnβt really change much, and so the lack of adaptability in the field led to horrific leadership decisions and loss of COs in the battles to come. Russia has learnt from that.
Remember, Ukraine is relying very heavily on Western aid, primarily much older hardware than NATO would field in a true peer war. Thereβs only so much of that kicking about, especially when Europe has far less stock than the MIC infatuated US.
There are no wunderwaffen that will win this war. I like to think weβre smart enough here to realise that HIMARS, even with GMLRS or, hell, ATACMS, doesnβt automatically give the UAF the win. It just bleeds a lot more Russians of men and equipment that then gets replaced. Unpopular as the war is, no one is overthrowing Putin and rolling a hard six on changing the outcome here. Itβs an attritional war, and Ukraine is the weaker side here without vast input from NATO. Manpower is a much bigger problem. Who does Ukraine recruit from if the vaunted counteroffensive goes badly?
Russiaβs economy continues to chug along despite all the rouble is collapsing propaganda put out in the news.
Any hope for a quick end to this war has long since gone. Russia is not taking Kyiv (to the thankfulness of friends I have in the north of the city) and Ukraine is not going back to pre-2014 borders, Crimea is far too defensible. Mike Kofman is a good source on this in the War on the Rocks podcast.
So, this is a proxy war that we canβt pull out of without losing a lot of face while at the same time domestic audiences deal with inflationary pressures and see dedollarisation become a talking point for those less enthused to be dragged around by the flailing US hegemony.
Pretty interesting times, methinks. Is this going to be a state of affairs that in five years time is still percolating through the news cycle? I sure hope not.