Russians kidnapped four employees of the Zaporizhzhia NPP and took them to an unknown destination, β Energoatom
The Times just published an article. Since it is behind a paywall, I have copied extracts below. Apparently Ukraine tried to storm the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant in October last year. Kyivβs great gamble did not pay off. It is not going to be easy to re-take the nuclear plant which remains an ever present and growing nuclear risk. The Russians are even more dug in than in October.
Must Ukraine be able to take the nuclear plant to be able to advance to Crimea? It seems like a tall order.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ukrainian-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-power-plant-russia-putin-war-2023-fx82xz3xz
Ukraineβs secret attempt to retake the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant
"In the dead of night last October a Ukrainian special forces team boarded a 40ft armoured patrol boat, taking up positions at its three heavy machineguns and Mk19 automatic grenade launcher.
They were among nearly 600 elite troops scattered along the north bank of the Dnipro River, which carves through Zaporizhzhia region. The teams boarded more than 30 vessels bristling with weapons, formidable gifts from friends in the West.
Their orders: to launch an assault to recapture the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant from the Russians on the opposite bank.
Kyiv has never acknowledged attacking Europeβs largest nuclear power station but Ukrainian special forces, military intelligence and navy personnel involved have revealed to The Times details of the highly dangerous operation to recover the site.
By the night of the raid, Russian troops had held the power station for over six months, using its territory to bombard Ukrainian cities across the water and a major steel plant in Nikopol. Ukraineβs desperate attempt to retake the facility from President Putinβs troops, and the reasons it gave for doing so, highlight the risk to Europe of nuclear disaster at the contested plant.
Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), visited the site last week in an effort to broker a deal to demilitarise the area around its six nuclear reactors.
βIt is very, very important that we agree on the fundamental principle that a nuclear power plant should not be attacked under any circumstances,β Grossi said during his visit, which took place a week after The Times asked the IAEA to comment on the raid. βIt shouldnβt be used to attack others, likewise. A nuclear accident with radiological consequences will spare no one.β
βThe idea was that this would be an infantry-only battle. They wouldnβt be able to use artillery against us, as this is a nuclear plant,β the officer said. Drawn from select units of Ukraineβs military intelligence, GUR, and including the Shaman battalion, the Kraken Regiment and the Ukrainian Foreign Legion, even the youngest among his brothers-in-arms were already battle-hardened. Yet none of them expected the resistance they would face at the power plant.
βThe Russians built a very dense defence, they mined everything,β the officer said. βWhen we were approaching they even pulled up tanks and artillery and started firing at us right on the water.β
...
His team tried to engage the tanks on the shoreline but it was difficult to fire anti-tank weapons while moving at speed over the water. The larger boats manoeuvred to try to attack Enerhodar from the opposite flank but a constant hail of fire eventually forced all the Ukrainians to withdraw.
βA lot of lives were saved thanks to the commander of this operation. When he realised it would be very, very difficult and we would take heavy casualties, instead of stupidly saying, βGo forward!β he decided we could retreat.β
Even among senior Ukrainian officials who are adamant the Russians must be driven out, the attempt to take the plant by force is considered controversial.
Energoatomβs Kotin said: βIf our army can advance south towards Crimea, toward Melitopol, this is the only option β no direct shelling of the plant, no direct advance on the territory of the plant with direct actions against the Russians. It is very dangerous to do such things near nuclear material. Any damage will bring radiation to the people and to the whole world.β
However, the greatest threat to the plant remains the Russian presence there, Kotin stressed. Today the Russians are using control centres as barracks, installing gun emplacements on the roofs of plant buildings and constructing fortifications close to storage sites of radioactive material. They keep ammunition trucks inside the reactorsβ turbine halls, risking a nuclear incident that could blight Ukraine for decades, he added.
βWe see the progressive degradation of the plant in all directions β the site itself, equipment and personnel; all type of programmes which in normal, peaceful times would be considered unacceptable,β Kotin added.
βWe are in a state of emergency, waiting until something bad happens, and that could happen at any time.β