But, ime, that’s not a typical way to parent. I don’t know anyone who does.
You seem to be comparing the best of some parenting techniques with worst of others and assigning a nationality to them. You are also acting as though it has to be one or the other.
I don’t like. ‘Tiger parenting’ it controlling often strays into abuse. It doesn’t treat the child as an individual and can be very damaging.
I don’t like the type of parent you describe your friends as, because they are not doing their children any favours too and are also (potentially) damaging their children.
Both my kids (19 & 12) are high achievers. I didn’t go to university and am extremely intelligent from an education or IQ stand point. However, I do have a senior professional role and am at the top of my sector.
I treated my kids as individuals. Dd could read and write very young, she always loved school and has enjoyed education. Ds couldn’t read very young, hates school until he was about 10. Shows no interest in reading for fun. However, in the last few years he has excelled at school, enjoys learning and is above ever age in several subjects.
I didn’t push either of them hard. I worked with their strengths and what they found enjoyable and supported who they were.
Both have always been able to sit still in a restaurant at a young age. There’s been no need to bring them up in a high pressure and controlling environment.
I can’t understand why you see Tiger parenting as the ideal. And work on the presumption that anyone who doesn’t do this just be like your friends.