@Hoppinggreen
I always drive slowly in residential areas or anywhere a child might emerge from behind a parked car.
If I see kids playing/walking near a road or on an unfenced pavement, I will slow down and/or reposition my car towards the centre of the road to avoid a situation developing.
It's called safe driving.
My brother was run over as a ten year old. The driver was within the speed limit (doing 57 in 60 zone according to police skid tests). My brother looked the wrong way and stepped off the pavement.
That driver should have slowed down when he saw a child on the pavement, holding a football and waiting to cross the road, but looking the wrong way.
So, yes. Although he wasn't breaking the law and could claim that he was driving 'safely', in reality he was driving at an excessive speed on a road lined with houses. He failed to anticipate a developing hazard and my brother had part of his brain removed as a result. My family was destroyed by that event and my brother still lives with my dad who's now in his eighties.
Should he have been allowed to drive again? I don't think so. But forgive and forget, eh.
That road now has a 30mph limit.
Trying to deflect the risk posed by dogs onto that posed by traffic is, by the way, bollocks.
If you drove a car with dodgy brakes, but stuck a sign above the windscreen saying 'don't step out, the brakes are shit', would that absolve you of your responsibilities as the car owner/driver?